|
Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 277-280
|
Discrepancy in the interpretation of cervical histology by gynecologic pathologists
b
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
(United States)
f
NONE
(United States)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CLASSIFICATION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
GENERAL PRACTICE;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
HUMAN;
MEDICAL EDUCATION;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
PAPILLOMA VIRUS;
PATHOLOGIST;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
UTERINE CERVICITIS;
UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY;
UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;
BIOPSY, NEEDLE;
CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
COLPOSCOPY;
CULTURE TECHNIQUES;
FEMALE;
GYNECOLOGY;
HUMANS;
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL;
PROBABILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;
|
EID: 0036334501
PISSN: 00297844
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02058-6 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (34)
|
References (18)
|