Thermodynamic stability of hydrogen-bonded nanostructures: A calorimetric study

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 15, 2004, Pages 3632-3639

  Ten Cate, Mattijs G J ^a   Huskens, Jurriaan ^a   Crego Calama, Mercedes ^a   Reinhoudt, David N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Calorimetry; Hydrogen bonds; Polar solvents; Self assembly; Thermodynamics

Indexed keywords

CALORIMETRY; HYDROGEN BONDS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SELF ASSEMBLY; STOICHIOMETRY; THERMODYNAMICS;

DOUBLE ROSETTES; SOLVENT POLARITY;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

ARTICLE; CALORIMETRY; COVALENT BOND; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NANOPARTICLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PARTICLE SIZE; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; ROSETTE FORMATION; STOICHIOMETRY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS; THERMOSTABILITY;

EID: 4243117260     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200400085     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. The nature of the hydrogen bond depends on the distance between the donor (D) and acceptor (A) atoms, which in turn is dependent on their electronegativities.
2. N. Takeda, K. Umemoto, K. Yamaguchi, M. Fujita, Nature 1999, 398, 794-799.
3. Z. Zhong, H. Ikeda, M. Ayabe, S. Shinkai, S. Sakemoto. K. Yamaguchi, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1002-1008.
4. D. K. Chand, K. Biradha, M. Fujita, Chem. Commun. 2001, 1652-1653.
5. K. Umemoto, K. T. H. Tsukui, K. Biradha, M. Fujita, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 2690-2692; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2620-2622.
6. K. Umemoto, K. T. H. Tsukui, K. Biradha, M. Fujita, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 2690-2692; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2620-2622.
7. A. Ikeda, H. Udzu, Z. Zhong, S. Shinkai, S. Sakemoto, K. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Sac. 2001, 123, 3872-3877.
8. E. Dalcanale, P. Jacopozzi, Angew. Chem. 1997, 709, 665-667; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 30, 613-615.
9. E. Dalcanale, P. Jacopozzi, Angew. Chem. 1997, 709, 665-667; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 30, 613-615.
10. F. Fochi, E. Wegelius, K. Rissanen, P. Cozzini, E. Marastoni, E. Fisicaro, P. Mannini, R. Fokkens, R. Dalcanale, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7539-7552.
11. M. Fujita, S. Nagao, M. Iida, K. Ogata, K. Ogura, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1574-1576.
12. M. Fujita, K. Umemoto, M. Yoshizawa, N. Fujita, T. Kusukawa, K. Biradha, Chem. Commun. 2001, 509-518.
13. O. Fox, N. K. Dalley, R. G. Harrison, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7111-7112.
14. O. D. Fox, J. F. Y. Leung, J. M. Hunter, N. K. Dalley, R. G. Harrison, Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 783-790.
15. L. S. Bok, J.-L. Hong, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4317-4320.
16. M. Fujita, D. Oguro, M. Miyazawa, I. Oka, K. Yamagushi, K. Ogura, Nature 1995, 378, 469-471.
17. J. L. Atwood, L. J. Barbour, A. Jerga, Chem. Commun. 2001, 2376-2377.
18. A. Shivanyuk, Jr. J. Rebek, Chem. Commun. 2001, 2374-2375.
19. M. O. Vysotsfcy, I. Thondorf, V. Böhmer, Chem. Commun. 2001, 1890-1891.
20. B. S. Lee, J.-I. Hong, Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8501-8504.
21. R. Fiammengo, P. Timmerman, F. De long, D. N. Reinhoudt, Chem. Commun. 2000, 2312-2314.
22. T. Grawe, T. Schrader, M. Gurrath, A. Kraft, F. Osterod, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 29-32.
23. B. Hamelin, L. Jullien, C. Derouet, C. H. de Penhoat, P. Berthault, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 720, 8438-8447.
24. F. Corbellini, R. Fiammengo, P. Timmerman, M. Crego-Calama, K. Versluis, A. J. R. Heck, I. Luyten, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6569-6575.
25. F. Corbellini, L. D. Costanzo, M. Crego-Calama, S. Geremia, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 725, 9946-9947.
26. M. Mammen, E. E. Simanek, G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12614-12623.
27. G.
28. C. T. Seto, J. P. Mathias, G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 775, 1321-1329.
29. L. J. Prins, J. Huskens, F. De long, P. Timmerman, D. N. Reinhoudt, Nature 1999, 398, 498-502.
30. P. Timmerman, R. H. Vreekamp, R. Hulst, W. Verboom, D. N. Reinhoudt, K. Risannen, K. A. Udachin, J. Ripmeester, Chem. Eur. J. 1997, 3, 1823-1832.
31. R. H. Vreekamp, J. P. M. van Duynhoven, M. Hubert, W. Verboom, D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1306-1309; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 55, 1215-1218.
32. R. H. Vreekamp, J. P. M. van Duynhoven, M. Hubert, W. Verboom, D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1306-1309; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 55, 1215-1218.
33. L. J. Prins, F. De long, P. Timmerman, D. N. Reinhoudt, Nature 2000, 408, 181-184.
34. K. A. Jolliffe, M. Crego-Calama, R. Fokkens, N. M. M. Nibbering, P. Timmerman, D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1294-1297; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1247-1251.
35. K. A. Jolliffe, M. Crego-Calama, R. Fokkens, N. M. M. Nibbering, P. Timmerman, D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1294-1297; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1247-1251.
36. L. J. Prins, K. A. Jolliffe, R. Hulst, P. Timmerman, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3617-3627.
37. A. G. Bielejewska, C. E. Marjo, L. J. Prins, P. Timmerman, F. De long, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7518-7533.
38. -1).
39. S. L. Tobey, E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10963-10970.
40. S. L. Tobey, E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14807-14815.
41. B. R. Linton, M. S. Goodman, E. Fan, S. A. Van Arman, A. Hamilton, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7313-7319.
42. M. V. Rekharsky, Y. Inoue, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1875-1917.
43. For a detailed description of the ITC experiments see the Experimental Section.
44. -8.
45. 6) for double rosette assemblies.
46. S. Sun, Md. A. Fazal, B. C. Roy, B. Chandra, S. Mallik, Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 1584-1590.
47. The broken line in the EEC plot describes the behavior when the enthalpy changes are completely compensated by entropy changes. Beneath this line ΔG° < 0, and above it ΔG° > 0. At the point where the experimental line (solid) crosses the broken line Δ° = TΔS° and TΔG° = 0.
48. C. Reichardt, Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
49. N scale ranges from 0 for TMS, the least polar solvent, to 1 for water, the most polar solvent.
50. Possibly the hydrophobic surface of the assembly is better solvated by the methyl groups of methanol and therefore results in less competition in hydrogen bonding.
51. E. A. Archer, M. J. Krische, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5074-5083.
52. J. N. Spencer, J, R. Sweigart, M. E. Brown, R. L. Sensing, T. L. Hassinger, W. Kelly, D. L. Housel, G. W. Reisinger, J. Phys. Chem. 1976, 50, 811-814.