Encapsulation of small organic molecules by a self-assembled molecular capsule through charged hydrogen bonding interaction

Tetrahedron Letters

Volumn 37, Issue 47, 1996, Pages 8501-8504

  Lee, Sang Bok ^a   Hong, Jong In ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYCYCLIC HYDROCARBON;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; ENANTIOMER; ENCAPSULATION; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT;

EID: 0030592787     PISSN: 00404039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0040-4039(96)01950-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. 1. For an excellent introduction on self-assembling biological systems, see: (a) Lehninger, A. L. Biochemistry; Worth Publishers, Inc.: New York, 1976; Chapter 36.
2. (b) Alberts, B.; Bray, D.; Lewis, J.; Raff, M.; Roberts, K.; Watson, J. D. Molecular Biology of the Cell; Garland Publishing: New York, 2nd Ed., 1989.
3. 2. (a) Namba, K.; Stubbs, G. Science, 1986, 231, 1401.
4. (b) Klug, A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1983, 22, 565.
5. 3. For recent reviews, see: (a) Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular Chemistry; VCH: Weinheim, 1995.
6. (b) Lindsey, J. S. New J. Chem. 1991, 15, 153.
7. (c) Lawrence, D. S.; Jiang, T.; Levett, M. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2229.
8. 4. (a) Grotzfeld, R. M.; Branda, N.; Rebek, J., Jr. Science, 1996, 271, 487.
9. (b) Meissner, R. S.; Rebek, J., Jr.; de Mendoza, J. Science, 1995, 270, 1485.
10. (c) Valdes, C.; Spitz, U. P.; Kubik, S. W.; Rebek, J., Jr. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1885.
11. (d) Valdes, C.; Spitz, U. P.; Toledo, L. M.; Kubik, S. W.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12733.
12. (e) Branda, N.; Grotzfeld, R. M.; Valdes, C.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 85.
13. (f) Branda, N.; Wyler, R.; Rebek, J., Jr. Science, 1994, 263, 1267.
14. (g) Wyler, R.; de Mendoza, J.; Rebek, J., Jr. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1699.
15. (h) Fujita, M.; Ogura, D.; Miyazawa, M.; Oka, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Ogura, K. Nature, 1995, 378, 469.
16. (i) Koh, K.; Araki, K.; Shinkai, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 8255.
17. (j) Vreekamp, R. H.; Verboom, W.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4282.
18. 5. (a) Collet, A. Tetrahedron, 1987, 43, 5725.
19. (b) Collet, A.; Dutasta, J.-P.; Lozach, B.; Canceill, J. In Topics in Current Chemistry; Weber, E., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1993; Vol. 165, pp 103-129.
20. ++1).
21. 7. Since 1 and 2 exist in enantiomer pairs, there are two ways of self-assembly. The first one in Figure 1 is derived from the same CTV's. The second way of assembly is derived from two different enantiomeric CTV's.
22. 6 indicates formation of the oligomeric structure, indicating that formation of the dimeric or oligomeric structure from 1:1 mixture of 1 and 2 is concentration-dependent.
23. 9. The energy-minimized structures were obtained with DISCOVER 95.0 of MSI on a Silicon Graphics INDY workstation.
24. 10. In comparison with release rate, inclusion rate of outide TMS into the cavity of the preformed capsule upon heating also turned out to be very slow.
25. 3 which is ∼40% larger than TMS.
26. 6 are not available.
27. 13. Bondi, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 441.