Eurocentric bias in women's psychology journals: Resistance to issues significant to people of color

European Psychologist

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 117-122

  Hall, Ronald E ^a,b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243049223     PISSN: 10169040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027//1016-9040.8.2.117     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Anderson, C. (1991). French scientists rebel against review system. Nature, 352, 555.
2. Armstrong, J. (1982). The ombudsman: Is review by peers as fair as it appears? Interfaces, 12, 62-74.
3. Arroyo, J. (1996). Psychotherapist bias with Hispanics: An analog study. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18(1), 21-28.
4. Bond, S., & Cash, T. (1992). Black beauty: Skin color and body images among African-American college women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 874-888.
5. Bonila-Silva, E. (1991). The essential social fact of race. American Sociological Review, 64, 899-906.
6. Ciccetti, D. (1991). The reliability for peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 119-135.
7. Cole, S. (1992). Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Corbett, M. (1995). The relationship between white racial identity and narcissism. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 56(4B), 2318.
9. Diamond, A.M. (1986). What is a citation worth? Journal of Human Resources, 21, 200-215.
10. Ernst, E., & Kienbacher, T. (1991). Chauvinism. Nature. 352, 560.
11. Felix v. Marquez, 78-2314, (U. S. Dist. Dist. of Columbia, 1981).
12. Fuchs, S., & Westervelt, S. (1996). Fraud and trust in science. Perspectives in Biological Medicine, 39, 248-270.
13. Garfield, E. (1994). The impact factor. Current Contents, 25, 3-8.
14. Germain, C. (1991). Human behavior in the social environment: An ecological view. New York: Columbia University Press.
15. Gitterman, A. (1991). Handbook of Sociology practice with vulnerable populations. New York: Columbia University Press.
16. Glantz, S. (1996). The cigarette papers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Goldbeck-Wood, S. (1998). What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? The British Medical Journal, 316, 86.
18. Hall, R. (1995). The bleaching syndrome: African Americans' response to cultural domination vis-a-vis skin color. Journal of Black Studies, 26(2), 172-183.
19. Hall, R. (1997). Eurogamy among Asian-Americans: A note on Western assimilation. The Social Science Journal, 34, 403-408.
20. Hargens, L.L. (1988). Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates. American Sociological Review, 53, 139-151.
21. Hirschman, C., & Kraly, E. (1990). Racial and ethnic inequality in the United States, 1940 and 1950: The impact of geographic location and human capital. International Migration Review, 24(1), 4-33.
22. Horrobin, D. (1990). The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. JAMA, 263, 1438-1441.
23. Joyner, C. (1978). The historical status of American Indians under international law. Indian Historian, 11(4), 30-36, 63.
24. Kassirer, J., & Campion, E. (1994). Peer review: Crude and understudied but indispensable. JAMA, 272, 97-97.
25. Kass, L. (1997). The end of courtship. Public Interest, 126, 39-63.
26. Lee, Y. (1991). Stereotypes, silence and threats: The determinants of perceived group homogeneity. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(6-B), 3342.
27. Maccoun, R. (1998). Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 259-287.
28. McIntosh, P. (1989). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible napsack. Peace and Freedom, July/Aug., Wellesy Collge, 10-12.
29. Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Mindick, B. (1982). When we practice to deceive: The ethics of a metascientific inquiry. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 226-227.
31. Meyers, D. (2002). Social psychology. New York: McGraw Hill.
32. Norman, A. (1994). Black-Korean relations: From desperation to dialogue, or from shouting and shooting to sitting and talking. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 3, 87-89.
33. Perloff, R., & Perloff, R. (1982). Improving research on and policies for peer review practices. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 232-233.
34. Peters, D., & Ceci, S. (1982). Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 187-195.
35. Rennie, D. (1998). Peer review in Prague. JAMA, 280, 214-215.
36. Robinson, T., & Ward, J. (Aug. 1995). African American adolescents and skin color. Journal of Black Psychology, 21, 256-274.
37. Sahay, S. (1994). Satisfaction among South Asian Canadien and European Canadien female university students. (Ethnic Identification). ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts, Item: 13.
38. Schiele, J. (1997). An Afrocentric perspective on social welfare philosophy and policy. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 24(2), 21-40.
39. Shamblin, D.H. (1970). Prestige and the sociology establishment. American Sociologist, 5, 154-156.
40. Singer, B. (1989). The criterial crisis of the academic world. Social Inquiry, 59, 125-143.
41. Stinson, A. (1979). Community development in an era of perspective search. Social Development Issues, 3(3), 6-21.
42. Urrutia, A. (1994). The development of black feminism. Human Mosaic, 28(1), 26-35.
43. Walker v. IRS, 713 F Supp. 403 (U. S. Dist. Ga. 1989).
44. Wilson, W.A. (1982). Research on peer - Review practices: Problems of interpretations, application, and propriety. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 242-243.
45. Woodward, J., & Goodstein, D. (1996). Conduct, misconduct and the structure of science. American Scientist, 84, 479-490.