Fraud and trust in science

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 248-269

  Fuchs, Stephan ^a   Westervelt, Saundra Davis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; ERROR; FORGERY; HUMAN RELATION; MASS MEDIUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCIENCE;

EID: 0030064716     PISSN: 00315982     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/pbm.1996.0043     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. SWAZEY, J. P.; ANDERSON, M. S.; and LEWIS, K. S. Ethical problems in academic research. Am. Scientist 81:542-553, 1993.
2. ZUCKERMAN, H. The sociology of science. In Handbook of Sociology, edited by N. J. SMELSER. Newbury Park: Sage, 1988. 511-574.
3. ZURER, P. Agency issues scientific misconduct rules. Chemical and Engineering News (August 28):22, 1989.
4. PRICE, A. R. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct. J. Higher Ed. 65:286-297, 1994.
5. ANDERSON, C. Misconduct panel sets ambitious agenda. Science 264:1841, 1994.
6. STONE, R., and MARSHALL, E. Imanishi-Kari case: ORI finds fraud. Science 266:1468-1469, 1994.
7. ORI. An Introduction. Office of Research Integrity, Public Health Service. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, September, 1993.
8. NAS. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. Vol. 1. NAS, Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
9. BUZZELLI, D. E. The definition of misconduct in science: A view From NSF. Science 259:584-585, 647-648, 1992.
10. GLADWELL, M. The fraud fraud. Washington Post (November 14):C1-C2, 1993.
11. RHOADES, L. Director of Division of Policy and Education, ORI, PHS. Personal communication, July 26, 1994.
12. JOHNSON, D. Much ado about what? Knowledge 14:197-204, 1992.
13. TEICH, A. Integrity in research: The scientific community view. Knowledge 14:185-192, 1992.
14. BROAD, W. J., and WADE, N. Betrayers of the Truth. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1982.
15. ZUCKERMAN, H. Deviant behavior and social control in science. In Deviance and Social Change, edited by E. SAGARIN. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1977. 87-138.
16. TUCHMAN, G. Mass media institutions. In Handbook of Sociology, edited by N.J. SMELSER. Newbury Park: Sage, 1988. 601-628.
17. HOLLANDER, R. D. On issues of scientific misconduct. Knowledge 14:193-196, 1992.
18. ENGLER, R. L.; COVELL, J. W.; FRIEDMAN, P. J.; et al. Misrepresentation and responsibility in medical research. N. Eng. J. Med. 317:1383-1389, 1987.
19. MEDAWAR, P. Scientific fraud. In his The Threat and the Glory. New York: Harper Collins, 1983/90. 64-70.
20. BEN-YEHUDA, N. The Politics and Morality of Deviance. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1990.
21. Fox, M. F. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. J. Higher Ed. 65:298-309, 1994.
22. WALKER, S. Sense and Nonsense about Crime. 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1989.
23. SIEGEL, L. J. Criminology. 3rd ed. St. Paul: West, 1989.
24. STEWART, W. W., and FEDER, N. The integrity of the scientific literature. Nature 325:207-214, 1987.
25. WOOLF, P. K. Deception in scientific research. Jurimerrics J. 29:67-95, 1988.