Marginal adaptation of Class 2 adhesive restorations

Quintessence International

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 413-419

  Duarte Jr , Sillas ^a   Saad, José Roberto Cury ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bulk; Centripetal placement; Class 2 composite resin; Dentin; Enamel; Marginal adaptation; Oblique placement

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE PLUS; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE PLUS; SILICON DIOXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH DISEASE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATRIX BANDS; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 42349108757     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent 1999;27:13-19.
2. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in a multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989;17(suppl 1):S10-S17.
3. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 1998;26:311-317.
4. Lopes GC, Ferreira Rde S, Baratieri LN, Vieira LC, Monteiro JS. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: New techniques and clinical possibilities. Case reports. Quintessence Int 2002;33:337-346.
5. Krejci I, Stavridakis M. New perspectives on dentin adhesion-Differing methods of bonding. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:727-732.
6. Bichacho N.The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;6:17-23.
7. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC,Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:17-24.
8. Davidson CL, De Gee AL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stress by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:146-148.
9. Peason GJ, Hegarty SM. Cusp movement with composite filling materials in conventional and modified MOD cavities. Br Dent J 1989,166:162-165.
10. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-878.
11. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998;77:1435-1445.
12. Mullejans R, Badawi MO, Raab WH, Lang H. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:122-126.
13. Kays BT, Sneed WD, Nuckles DB. Microhardness of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrices and light positions. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:487-490.
14. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjor IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:305-311.
15. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639.
16. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-440.
17. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stressor different C-factor cavities. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:177-183.
18. Donly KJ, Dowell A, Anixiadas C, Croll TP. Relationship among visible light source, composite resin polymerization shrinkage, and hygroscopic expansion. Quintessence Int 1990;21:883-886.
19. Peris AR, Duarte S Jr, Andrade MF.Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: Effect of microhybrid, flowable and compactable resins. Quintessence Int 2003;34:93-98.
20. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 1976;4: 199-206.
21. Taylor DF, Kalachandra S, Sankarapandian M, McGrath JE. Relationship between filler and matrix resin characteristics and the properties of uncured composite pastes. Biomaterials 1998;19:197-204.
22. Lutz E, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique.Quintessence Int 1986;17:777-784.
23. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Restoration quality in relation to wedge-mediated light channeling. Quintessence Int 1992;23:763-767.
24. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F.The importance of proximal curing in posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1992;23:605-607.
25. Szep S, Frank H, Kenzel B, Gerhardt T, Heidemann D. Comparative study of composite resin placement: Centripetal buildup versus incremental technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2001;13:243-250.
26. Meredith N, Setchell DJ. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent 1997;25:331-337.
27. Winkler MM, Katona TR, Paydar NH. Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V light-cured composite restorations. J Dent Res 1996;75:1477-1483.
28. Cho BH, Dickens SH, Bae JH, Chang CG, Son HH, Um CM. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:297-304.
29. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998; 10:47-54.
30. Hunter AR,Treasure ET, Hunter AJ. Increase in cavity volume associated with the removal of class II amalgam and composite restorations. Oper Dent 1995;20:2-6.
31. Losche GM. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: Guided polymerization vs reduced light intensity.J Adhes Dent 1999;1:31-39.
32. Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, Davidson C. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement. J Dent 2002;30:259-269.
33. Davidson CL. Glass ionomer base under posterior composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 1994;6:223-226.
34. Krejci I, Lutz F, Krejci D. The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear of conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1988,19:191-198.