Fast locomotor burst generation in late stage embryonic motility

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1733-1742

  Bradley, Nina S ^a   Ryu, Young U ^a   Lin, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL MOTILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EMBRYO CELL; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; LAMPREY; LEG MOVEMENT; LOCOMOTION; MUSCLE SPINDLE AFFERENT NERVE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; TIBIALIS ANTERIOR MUSCLE; VIDEORECORDING;

AGING; ANIMALS; CHICK EMBRYO; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EXTREMITIES; FETAL MOVEMENT; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEURONS, AFFERENT; PROPRIOCEPTION; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 42249110556     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01393.2007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bekoff A. Ontogeny of leg motor output in the chick embryo: a neural analysis. Brain Res 106: 271-291, 1976.
2. Bekoff A. Neuroethological approaches to the study of motor development in chicks - achievements and challenges. J Neurobiol 23: 1486-1505, 1992.
3. Beres-Johnes JA, Johnson TD, Harkema SJ. Clonus after human spinal cord injury cannot be attributed solely to recurrent muscle-tendon stretch. Exp Brain Res 149: 222-236, 2003.
4. Bradley NS. Transformations in embryonic motility in chick: kinematic correlates of type I and II motility at E9 and E12. J Neurophysiol 81: 1486-1494, 1999.
5. Bradley NS. Age-related changes and condition-dependent modifications in distribution of limb movements during embryonic motility. J Neurophysiol 86: 1511-1522, 2001.
6. Bradley NS, Bekoff A. Development of coordinated movement in chicks. I. Temporal analysis of hindlimb muscle synergies at embryonic days 9 and 10. Dev Psychobiol 23: 763-782, 1990.
7. Bradley NS, Jahng DY. Selective effects of light exposure on distribution of motility in the chick embryo at E18. J Neurophysiol 90: 1408-1417, 2003.
8. Bradley NS, Solanki D, Zhao D. Limb movements during embryonic development in the chick: evidence for a continuum in limb motor control antecedent to locomotion. J Neurophysiol 94: 4401-4411, 2005.
9. Cangiano L, Grillner S. Fast and slow locomotor burst generation in the hemispinal cord of the lamprey. J Neurophysiol 89: 2931-2942, 2003.
10. Cangiano L, Grillner S. Mechanisms of rhythm generation in a spinal locomotor network deprived of crossed connections: the lamprey hemicord. J Neurosci 25: 923-935, 2005.
11. Chambers SH, Bradley NS, Orosz MD. Kinematic analysis of wing and leg movements for type I motility in E9 chick embryos. Exp Brain Res 103: 218-226, 1995.
12. Cheng J, Stein RB, Jovanovic K, Yoshida K, Bennett DJ, Han Y. Identification, localization, and modulation of neural networks for walking in the mudpuppy (Necturus maculatus) spinal cord. J Neurosci 18: 4295-4304, 1998.
13. Chub N, O'Donovan MJ. Blockade and recovery of spontaneous rhythmic activity after application of neurotransmitter antagonists to spinal networks of the chick embryo. J Neurosci 18: 294-306, 1998.
14. Cohen AH, Harris-Warrick RM. Strychnine eliminates alternating motor output during fictive locomotion in the lamprey. Brain Res 293: 164-167, 1984.
15. Grillner S. Control in locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Motor Control. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc. 1981, sect. 2, vol. II, chapt. 26, p. 1179-1236.
16. Hamburger V, Balaban M, Oppenheim R, Wenger E. Periodic motility of normal and spinal chick embryos between 8 and 17 days of incubation. J Exp Zool 159: 1-14, 1965.
17. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo (reprinted from J Morphol 88: 1951). Dev Dyn 195: 231-272, 1992.
18. Hamburger V, Oppenheim RE. Prehatching motility and hatching behavior in the chick. J Exp Zool 166: 171-204, 1967.
19. Hamburger V, Wenger E, Oppenheim R. Motility in the chick embryo in the absence of sensory input. J Exp Zool 162: 133-160, 1966.
20. Hanson MG, Landmesser LT. Characterization of the circuits that generate spontaneous episodes of activity in the early embryonic mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci 23: 587-600, 2003.
21. Jacobson RD, Hollyday M. A behavioral and electromyographic study of walking in the chick. J Neurophysiol 48: 238-256, 1982.
22. Johnston RM, Bekoff A. Patterns of muscle activity during different behaviors in chicks: Implications for neural control. J Comp Physiol [A] 179: 169-184, 1996.
23. Lafreniere-Roula M, McCrea DA. Deletions of rhythmic motoneuron activity during fictive locomotion and scratch provide clues to the organization of the mammalian central pattern generator. J Neurophysiol 94: 1120-1132, 2005.
24. Landmesser LT, O'Donovan MJ. Activation patterns of embryonic chick hind limb muscles recorded in ovo and in an isolated spinal cord preparation. J Physiol 347: 189-204, 1984.
25. Maier A. Sensory and motor innervation of bird intrafusal muscle fibers. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 103A: 635-639, 1992.
26. Maier A. Development of chicken intrafusal muscle fibers. Cell Tissue Res 274: 383-391, 1993.
27. Milner LD, Landmesser LT. Cholinergic and GABAergic inputs drive patterned spontaneous motoneuron activity before target contact. J Neurosci 19: 3007-3022, 1999.
28. Muir GD, Gosline JM, Steeves JD. Ontogeny of bipedal locomotion: walking and running in the chick. J Physiol 493: 589-601, 1996.
29. Musselman KE, Yang JF. Loading the limb during rhythmic leg movements lengthens the duration of both flexion and extension in human infants. J Neurophysiol 97: 1247-1257, 2007.
30. O'Donovan M, Ho S, Yee W. Calcium imaging of rhythmic network activity in the developing spinal cord of the chick embryo. J Neurosci 14: 6354-6369, 1994.
31. O'Donovan MJ. Motor activity in the isolated spinal cord of the chick embryo: synaptic drive and firing pattern of single motoneurons. J Neurosci 9: 943-958, 1989.
32. O'Donovan MJ, Chub N. Population behavior and self-organization in the genesis of spontaneous rhythmic activity by developing spinal networks. Semin Cell Dev Biol 8: 21-28, 1997.
33. O'Donovan MJ, Landmesser LT. The development of hindlimb motor activity studied in the isolated spinal cord of the chick embryo. J Neurosci 7: 3256-3264, 1987.
34. Oppenheim RW. Prehatching and hatching behavior in birds: a comparative study of altricial and precocial species. Anim Behav 20: 644-655, 1972.
35. Orlovsky GN, Deliagina TG, Grillner S. Neuronal Control of Locomotion: From Mollusc to Man. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1999.
36. Sharp AA, Ma E, Bekoff A. Developmental changes in leg coordination of the chick at embryonic days 9, 11, and 13: uncoupling of ankle movements. J Neurophysiol 82: 2406-2414, 1999.
37. Stein PS. Neuronal control of turtle hindlimb motor rhythms. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 191: 213-229, 2005.
38. Stein PS, Daniels-McQueen S. Modular organization of turtle spinal interneurons during normal and deletion fictive rostral scratching. J Neurosci 22: 6800-6809, 2002.
39. Stein PS, Daniels-McQueen S. Variations in motor patterns during fictive rostral scratching in the turtle: knee-related deletions. J Neurophysiol 91: 2380-2384, 2004.
40. Stein PS, Grossman ML. Central program for scratch reflex in turtle. J Comp Physiol [A] 140: 287-294, 1980.
41. Tabak J, Senn W, O'Donovan MJ, Rinzel J. Modeling of spontaneous activity in developing spinal cord using activity-dependent depression in an excitatory network. J Neurosci 20: 3041-3056, 2000.