Detection of neoplasia at colonoscopy: What next?

Endoscopy

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 333-335

  Rex, D ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACROGOL; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE;

CHROMOENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLON TUMOR; COLONOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SAFETY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 42149167894     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995591     Document Type: Editorial

References (35)

1. Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG et al. Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 284-290
2. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy.Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1990; 82: 1769-1772
3. Rex D, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24-28
4. Rex D, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: Impact on miss rates and efficiency determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2000-2005
5. Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2138-2142
6. Kaltenbach TR, Freidland S, Soetikno RM. A new benchmark in the colorectal neoplasm miss rate during colonoscopy: results of a randomized controlled trial of wide angle view (170°) colonoscopy comparing narrow band imaging and white light. Gastrointest Endosc 2007: 65: AB127
7. Saitoh Y, Waxman I, West A et al. Prevalence and distinctive biological features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1657-1665
8. Hurlstone D, Cross S, Adam I et al. A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2543-2549
9. Jaramillo E, Watanabe M, Slezak P, Rubio C. Flat neoplastic lesions of the colon and rectum detected by high-resolution video endoscopy and chromoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 114-122
10. Rembacken B, Fujii T, Cairns A et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000; 355: 1211-1214
11. Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, Fork F. Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 2002; 51: 550-555
12. Brooker J, Saunders B, Shah S et al. Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 333-338
13. Stoffel EM, Stockwell DH, Normolle DP et al. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy detects more adenomas than conventional colonoscopy: a randomized trial of back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: AGA48
14. Kiesslich R, von Bergh M, Hahn M et al. Chromoendoscopy with indigo-carmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 1001-1006
15. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1872-1885
16. Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Rex DK. Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 451-455
17. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 96-102
18. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006: 355: 2533-2541
19. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007: 102: 856-561
20. Atkin W, Rogers P, Cardwell C et al. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2004; 126:1247-1256
21. Sanchez W, Harewood GC, Petersen BT. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004: 99: 1941-1945
22. Schoenfeld P, Lipscomb S, Crook J et al. Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 1999; 117: 312-318
23. Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Grotmol T et al. Differences in detection rates of colorectal polyps and adenomas among endoscopists in population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: AB214
24. Rex DK. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2866-2877
25. Adler A, Papanikolaou IS, Pohl H et al. Narrow band imaging (NBI) influences the learning curve for conventional endoscopy - final results of a prospective randomized study in the detection of colorectal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: AB116
26. Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 42-47
27. Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 109-114
28. Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K et al. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap. Endoscopy 1998, 30: 444-447
29. Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Yamada A et al. Usefulness of hood attached to the tip of colonoscope for detection of colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: AB213
30. Lee Y. Hui AJ, Wong VW et al. A randomized controlled trial study comparing cap-assisted colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a preliminary result. Castrointest Endosc 2006; 63: AB226
31. Triadafilopoulos G. A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device ("Third Eye Retroscope™") improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomical models of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: AB103
32. Rostom A. Jolicoeur E, Dube C et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and poly-ethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006: 64: 544-552
33. Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas-Perez D, Gimeno-Garcia A et al. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 6161-6166
34. Aoun E, Abdul-Baki H, Azar C et al. A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 213-218
35. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 873-885