Dynamic modeling of the 2004 Mw 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 113, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Ma, Shuo ^a,b   Custódio, Susana ^a   Archuleta, Ralph J ^a   Liu, Pengcheng ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFTERSHOCK; EARTHQUAKE HYPOCENTER; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; GPS; GROUND MOTION; KINEMATICS; PARKFIELD EARTHQUAKE 2004; SAN ANDREAS FAULT;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; PARKFIELD; UNITED STATES;

EID: 42149159979     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2007JB005216     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aagaard, B. T., and T. H. Heaton (2004), Near-source ground motions from simulations of sustained intersonic and supersonic fault ruptures, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94, 2064-2078.
2. Andrews, D. J. (1976), Rupture velocity of plane strain shear cracks, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 5679-5687.
3. Andrews, D. J. (1999), Test of two methods for faulting in finite-difference calculations, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89, 931-937.
4. Andrews, D. J., and Y. Ben-Zion (1997), Wrinkle-like slip pulse on a fault between different materials, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 553-571.
5. Archuleta, R. J., and S. M. Day (1980), Dynamic rupture in a layered medium: The 1966 Parkfield earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 70, 671-689.
6. Bakun, W. H., and T. V. McEvilly (1979), Earthquakes near Parkfield, California: Comparing the 1934 and 1966 sequences, Science, 205, 1375-1377.
7. Bakun, W. H., and T. V. McEvilly (1984), Recurrence models and Parkfield, California, earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 3051-3058.
8. Bakun, W. H., et al. (2005), Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake, Nature, 437, 969-974.
9. Ben-Zion, Y. (2006), Comment on "Material contrast does not predict earthquake rupture propagation direction" by R. A Harris and S. M. Day, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13310, doi:10.1029/2005GL025652.
10. Ben-Zion, Y, and D. J. Andrews (1998), Properties and implications of dynamic rupture along a material interface, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 88, 1085-1094.
11. Bernard, P., and D. Baumont (2005), Shear mach wave characterization for kinematic fault rupture models with constant supershear rupture velocity, Geophys. J. Int., 162, 431-447.
12. Borcherdt, R. D., J. Malcolm, S. Johnston, G. Glassmoyer, and C. Dietel (2006), Recordings of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake on the general earthquake observation system array: Implications for earthquake precursors, fault rupture, and coseismic strain changes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S73-S89, doi:10.1785/0120050827.
13. Choi, K., A. Bilich, K. M. Larson, and P. Axelrad (2004), Modified sidereal filtering: Implications for high-rate GPS positioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L22608, doi:10.1029/2004GL021621.
14. Choy, G. L., and S. H. Kirby (2004), Apparent stress, fault maturity and seismic hazard for normal-fault earthquakes at subduction zones, Geophys. J. Int., 159, 991-1012.
15. Cochard, A., and J. R. Rice (2000), Fault rupture between dissimilar materials: III-posedness, regularization, and slip-pulse response, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 25,891-25,907.
16. Cormier, V. F., and P. Spudich (1984), Amplification of ground motion and waveform complexities in fault zones: Examples from the San Andreas and Calaveras faults, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 79, 135-152.
17. w 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake: Inversion of near-source ground motion using multiple data sets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L23312, doi:10.1029/2005GL024417.
18. Custódio, S., M. T. Page, K. Larson, and R. J. Archuleta (2007), Combining different datasets to obtain a rupture model: The 2004 M6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 303.
19. Dalguer, L. A., K. Irikura, and J. D. Riera (2003), Generation of new cracks accompanied by the dynamic shear rupture propagation of 2000 Tottori (Japan) earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93, 2236-2252.
20. Das, S., and K. Aki (1977), A numerical study of two-dimensional spontaneous rupture propagation, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 50, 643-668.
21. Day, S. M. (1982a), Three-dimensional finite difference simulation of fault dynamics: Rectangular faults with fixed rupture velocity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 72, 705-727.
22. Day, S. M. (1982b), Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: The effect of nonuniform prestress, Bull. Seismol. Soc.Am., 72, 1881-1902.
23. Day, S. M., and G. P. Ely (2002), Effect of a shallow weak zone on fault rupture: Numerical simulation of scale-model experiments, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 92, 3022-3041.
24. Day, S. M., L. A. Dlguer, N. Lapusta, and Y. Liu (2005), Comparison of finite difference and boundary integral solutions to three-dimensional spontaneous rupture, J. Geophys. Res., 110, B12307, doi:10.1029/ 2005JB003813.
25. Dor, O., Y. Ben-Zion, T. K. Rockwell, and J. Brune (2006a), Pulverized rocks in the Mojave section of the San Andreas Fault zone, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 245, 642-654.
26. Dor, O., T. K. Rockwell, and Y. Ben-Zion (2006b), Geologic observations of damage asymmetry in the structure of the San Jacinto, San Andreas and Punchbowl faults in southern California: A possible indicator for preferred rupture propagation direction, Pure Appl. Geophys., 163, 301-349, doi:10.1007/s00024-005-0023-9.
27. Dunham, E. M., and R. J. Archuleta (2004), Evidence for a supershear transient during the 2002 Denali Fault earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94, S256-S268.
28. Dunham, E. M., and R. J. Archuleta (2005), Near-source ground motion from steady state dynamic rupture pulses, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L03302, doi:10.1029/2004GL021793.
29. Eberhart-Phillips, D., and A. J. Michael (1993), Three-dimensional velocity structure, seismicity, and fault structure in the Parkfield region, central California, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 15,737-15,758.
30. Favreau, P., and R. J. Archuleta (2003), Direct seismic energy modeling and an application to the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(5), 1198, doi:10.1029/2002GL015968.
31. Fletcher, J. B., P. Spudich, and L. M. Baker (2006), Direct observation of earthquake rupture propagation in the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake using the UPSAR accelerograph array, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S129-S142, doi:10.1785/0120050812.
32. Guatteri, M., and P. Spudich (1998), Coseismic temporal changes of slip direction: The effect of absolute stress on dynamic rupture, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 88, 777-789.
33. Guatteri, M., and P. Spudich (2000), What can strong-motion data tell us about slip-weakening fault-friction laws?, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, 98-116.
34. Guatteri, M., P. M. Mai, and G. C. Beroza (2004), A pseudo-dynamic approximation to dynamic rupture models for strong motion prediction, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94, 2051-2063.
35. Harris, R. A., and J. R. Arrowsmith (2006), Introduction to the special issue on the 2004 Parkfield earthquake and the Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S1-S10, doi:10.1785/0120050831.
36. Harris, R. A., and S. M. Day (1997), Effects of a low-velocity zone on a dynamic rupture, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 1267-1280.
37. Harris, R. A., and S. M. Day (2005), Material contrast does not predict earthquake rupture propagation direction, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L23301, doi:10.1029/2005GL023941.
38. Harris, R. A., and S. M. Day (2006), Reply to comment by Y. Ben-Zion on "Material contrast does not predict earthquake rupture propagation direction," Geophys. Res, Lett., 33, L13311, doi:10.1029/ 2006GL026811.
39. Harris, R. A., and P. Segall (1997), Detection of a locked zone at depth on the Parkfield, California, segment of the San Andreas fault, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 7945-7962.
40. Heaton, T. H. (1990), Evidence for and implications of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 64, 1-20.
41. Ida, Y. (1972), Cohesive force across the rip of a longitudinal-shear crack and Griffith's specific surface energy, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 3796-3805.
42. Johanson, I. A., E. J. Fieding, F. Rolandone, and R. Burgmann (2006), Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from space-geodetic data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S269-S282, doi:10.1785/0120050818.
43. Johnson, K. M., R. Burgmann, and K. Larson (2006), Frictional properties on the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California, inferred from models of afterslip following the 2004 earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S321-S338, doi:10.1785/0120050808.
44. Langbein, J., R. Borcherdt, D. Dreger, J. Fletcher, J. L. Hardebeck, M. Hellweg, C. Ji, M. Johnston, J. R. Murray, and R. Nadeau (2005), Preliminary report on the 28 September 2004, M 6.0 Parkfield, California earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76, 10-26.
45. Langbein, J., J. R. Murray, and H. A. Snyder (2006), Coseismic and initial postseismic deformation from the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake, observed by Global Positioning System, Electronic Distance Meter, creepmeters, and borehole strainmeters, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S304-S320.
46. Larson, K. M., P. Bodin, and J. Gomberg (2003), Using 1-Hz GPS Data to measure deformations caused by the Denali fault earthquake, Science, 300(5624), 1421-1424, doi:10.1126/science.1084531.
47. w, 6.0 Parkfield earthquake including an approximation to site effects, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S143-S158, doi:10.1785/0120050826.
48. Lysmer, J., and R. L. Kuhlemeyer (1969), Finite dynamic model for infinite media, J. Eng. Mech., 95, 859-877.
49. Ma, S., and R. J. Archuleta (2006), Radiated seismic energy based on dynamic rupture models of faulting, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B05315, doi:10.1029/2005JB004055.
50. Ma, S., and P. Liu (2006), Modeling of the perfectly matched layer absorbing boundaries and intrinsic attenuation in explicit finite element methods, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, 1779-1794, doi:10.1785/0120050219.
51. Murray, J., and J. Langbein (2006), Slip on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California, over two earthquake cycles and the implications for seismic hazard, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S283-S303, doi:10.1785/0120050820.
52. Murray, J., P. Segall, P. Cervelli, W. Prescott, and J. Svarc (2001), Inversion of GPS data for spatially variable slip-rate on the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 359-362.
53. Nadeau, R. M., W. Foxall, and T. V. McEvilly (1995), Clustering and periodic recurrence of microearthquakes on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California, Science, 267, 503-507.
54. Nielsen, S. B., and K. B. Olsen (2000), Constraints on stress and friction from dynamic rupture models of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake, Pure Appl. Geophys., 157, 2029-2046.
55. Olsen, K., R. Madariaga, and R. J. Archuleta (1997), Three dimensional dynamic simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake, Science, 278, 834-838.
56. Palmer, A. C., and J. R. Rice (1973), The growth of slip surfaces in the progressive failure of over-consolidated clay, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 332, 527-548.
57. Peyrat S., and K. B. Olsen (2004), Nonlinear dynamic rupture inversion of the 2000 Western Tottori, Japan, earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L05604, doi:10.1029/2003GL019058.
58. Peyrat, S., K. Olsen, and R. Madariaga (2001), Dynamic modeling of the 1992 Landers earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 26,467-26,482.
59. Ranjith, K., and J. R. Rice (2001), Slip dynamics at an interface between dissimilar materials, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 49, 341-361.
60. Rubin, A. M., and J.-P. Ampuero (2007), Aftershock asymmetry on a bimaterial interface, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B05307, doi:10.1029/ 2006JB004337.
61. Shakal, A., V. Graizer, M. Huang, R. Borcherdt, H. Haddadi, K.-W. Lin, C. Stephens, and P. Roffers (2005), Preliminary analysis of strong-motion recordings from the 28 September 2004 Parkfield, California earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76, 27-39.
62. Simpson, R. W., M. Barall, J. Langbein, J. R. Murray, and M. J. Rymer (2006), San Andreas Fault geometry in the Parkfield, California, region, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S28-S37, doi:10.1785/0120050824.
63. Spudich, P., and L. N. Frazer (1984), Use of ray theory to calculate high-frequency radiation from earthquake sources having spatially-variable rupture velocity and stress drop, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 74, 2061-2082.
64. Thurber, C., S. Roecker, K. Roberts, M. Gold, L. Powell, and K. Rittger (2003), Earthquake locations and three-dimensional fault zone structure along the creeping section of the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, CA: Preparing for SAFOD, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(3), 1112, doi:10.1029/2002GL016004.
65. Thurber, C., H. Zhang, F. Waldhauser, J. Hardebeck, A. Michael, and D. Eberhart-Phillips (2006), Three-dimensional compressional wave-speed model, earthquake relocations, and focal mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, region, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S38-S49, doi:10.1785/0120050925.
66. Venkataraman, A., L. Rivera, and H. Kanamori (2002), Radiated energy from the 16 October 1999 Hector Mine earthquake: Regional and teleseismic estimates, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 92, 1256-1265.
67. Waldhauser, F., W. Ellsworth, D. P. Schaff, and A. Cole (2004), Streaks, multiplets, and holes: High-resolution spatio-ternporal behavior of Parkfield seismicity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L18608, doi:10.1029/2004GL020649.
68. Xia, K., A. J. Rosakis, H. Kanamori, and J. R. Rice (2005), Laboratory earthquake along inhomogeneous faults: Directionality and supershear, Science, 308, 681-684, doi:10.1126/science.1108193.