Kinematic inversion of the 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield earthquake including an approximation to site effects

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 96, Issue 4 B, 2006, Pages

  Liu, Pengcheng ^a   Custódio, Susana ^a   Archuleta, Ralph J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GROUND MOTION; PARKFIELD EARTHQUAKE; RUPTURE MODEL; SPACE TIME DISTRIBUTION;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CORRELATION METHODS; INVERSE KINEMATICS; NOISE ABATEMENT; SEISMOGRAPHS; SEISMOLOGY; AMPLIFICATION; KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMIC WAVES; TECTONICS;

EARTHQUAKES; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

COSEISMIC PROCESS; DATA INVERSION; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE HYPOCENTER; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; FAULT PLANE; FAULT SLIP; GROUND MOTION; PARKFIELD EARTHQUAKE 2004; PEAK ACCELERATION; SEISMICITY; SITE EFFECT; STRONG MOTION; FAULT; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC DATA; SEISMIC SOURCE; SEISMOGRAM; VELOCITY STRUCTURE;

CALIFORNIA; COALINGA; NORTH AMERICA; PARKFIELD; UNITED STATES;

HYPOCENTER; SEISMOGRAMS; SPACE-TIME DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 33845810094     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120050826     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bakun, W. H., and A. G. Lindh (1985). The Parkfield, California, earthquake prediction experiment, Science 229, 619-624.
2. Bakun, W. H., and T. V. McEvilly (1984). Recurrence models and Parkfield, California, earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 87, no. 18, 3051-3058, doi 10.1029/0JGREA0000890000B5003051000001.
3. Bakun, W. H., B. Aagaard, B. Dost, W. L. Ellsworth, J. L. Hardebeck, R. A. Harris, C. Ji, M. J. S. Johnston, J. Langbein, J. J. Lienkaemper, A. J. Michael, J. R. Murray, R. M. Nadeau, P. A. Reasenberg, M. S. Reichle, E. A. Roeloffs, A. Shakal, R. W. Simpson, and F. Waldhauser (2005), Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake, Nature 437, 969-974.
4. Ben-Zion, Y., J. R. Rice, and R. Dmowska (1993). Interaction of the San Andreas fault creeping segment with adjacent great rupture zones and earthquake recurrence at Parkfield, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 2135-2144.
5. Borcherdt, R. D., M. J. S. Johnston, C. Dietel, G. Glassmoyer, D. Myren, and C. Stephens (2004). Acceleration and volumetric strain generated by the Parkfield 2004 earthquake on the GEOS strong-motion array near Parkfield, California, U.S. Geol. Surv: Open-File Rep. 20041376.
6. Chinnery, M. A. (1961). The deformation of the ground around surface faults. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 51, no. 3, 355-372.
7. w 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake: inversion of near-source ground motion using multiple data sets. Geophys. Res. Let. 32, L23-312, doi 10.1029/ 2005GL024417.
8. Eberhart-Phillips, D. (1989). Active faulting and deformation of the Coalinga anticline as interpreted from three-dimensional velocity structure and seismicity, J. Geophys. Res. 94, no. 13, 15,565-15,586, doi 10.1029/89JB01390.
9. Eberhart-Phillips, D., and A. J. Michael (1993). Three-dimensional velocity structure, seismicity, and fault structure in the Parkfield Region, central California, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 15,737-15,758.
10. Fletcher, J. B., and P. Spudich (1998). Rupture characteristics of the three M≈4.7 (1992-1994) Parkfield earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 835-854, doi 10.1029/97JB01797.
11. Fletcher, J. B., P. Spudich, and L. M. Baker (2006). Direct observation of earthquake rupture propagation in the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake using the UPSAR accelerograph array, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S129-S142.
12. Harris, R. A., and P. Segall (1987). Detection of a locked zone at depth on the Parkfield, California, segment of the San Andreas fault, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 7945-7962.
13. Ji, C., D. J. Wald, and D. V. Helmberger (2002). Source description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake, part I: wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution analysis, Bull. Seisin. Soc. Am. 92, no. 4, 1192-1207.
14. Johanson, I. A., E. J. Fielding, F. Rolandone, and R. Bürgmann (2006). Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from space-geodetic data. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S269-S282.
15. Johnson, K. M., R. Bürgmann, and K. Larson (2006). Frictional afterslip following the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4b, S321-S338.
16. Kilb, D., G. Biasi, J. Brune, J. Anderson, and F. L. Vernon (2003). Quantifying properties of seismic spectra: an examination of 100's of spectra from southern California earthquakes recorded by the ANZA seismic network, EOS Trans. AGU 84, no. 46, Fall Meet. Suppl., S42C-0173 (abstract).
17. Langbein, J., R. Borcherdt, D. Dreger, J. Fletcher, J. L. Hardebeck, M. Hellweg, C. Ji, M. Johnston, J. R. Murray, and R. Nadeau (2005). Preliminary report on the 28 September 2004, M 6.0 Parkfield, California earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 76, 10-26.
18. Langbein, J., J. R. Murray, and H. A. Snyder (2006). Coseismic and initial postseismic deformation from the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake observed by Global Positioning System, creepmeters, and borehole strainmeters. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S304-S320.
19. Lees, J. M., and C. Nicholson (1993). Three-dimensional tomography of the 1992 Southern California earthquake sequence; constraints on dynamic earthquake rupture? Geology 21, no. 5, 387-390.
20. Li, Y., P. Leary, K. Aki, and P. Malin (1990). Seismic trapped modes in the Oroville and San Andreas fault zones, Science 249, 763-766.
21. Li, Y., J. E. Vidale, and E. S. Cochran (2004). Low-velocity damaged structure of the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield from fault zone trapped waves, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L12S06, doi 10.1029/2003GL019044.
22. Lienkaemper, J. J., B. Baker, and F. S. McFarland (2006). Surface slip associated with the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake measured on alinement arrays, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S239-S249.
23. Liu, P., and R. J. Archuleta (2004). A new nonlinear finite fault inversion with three-dimensional Green's functions: application to the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 109, BO2318 doi 10.1029/2003JB002625.
24. Malin, P. E., and M. G. Alvarez (1992). Stress diffusion along the San Andreas fault at Parkfield, California, Science 256, 1005-1007.
25. McJunkin, R. D., and A. F. Shakal (1983). Parkfield strong-motion array, Calif. Geol. 36, 27-34.
26. MicHhelini, A., and T. V. McEvilly (1991). Seismological studies at Parkfield, part I: Simultaneous inversion for velocity structure and hypocenters using cubic B-splines parameterization, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 81, no. 2, 524-552.
27. Murray, J., and J. Langbein (2006). Slip on the San Andreas Fault at Park-field, California, over two earthquake cycles and the implications for seismic hazard, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S283-S303.
28. Murray, J. R., P. Segall, P. Cervelli, W. Prescott, and J. Svarc (2001). Inversion of GPS data for spatially variable slip-rate on the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, CA, Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 359-362, doi 10.1029/2000GL011933.
29. Nicholson, C., and J. M. Lees (1992). Travel-time tomography in the northem Coachella Valley using aftershocks of the 1986 ML 5.9 North Palm Springs earthquake, Geophys. Res. Let. 19, 1-4.
30. Roeloffs, E., and J. Langbein (1994). The earthquake prediction experiment at Parkfield, California, Rev. Geophys. 32, 315-336.
31. Rymer, M. J., J. C. Tinsley, J. A. Treiman, J. R. Arrow-smith, K. B. Clahan, A. M. Rosinski, W. A. Bryant, H. A. Snyder, G. S. Fuis, N. Toké, and G. W. Bawden (2006). Surface fault afterslip associated with the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S11-S27.
32. Segall, P., and Y. Du (1993). How similar were the 1934 and 1966 Parkfield earthquakes? J. Geophys. Res. 98, 4527-4538.
33. Shakal, A., and H. Haddadi (2006). Note on the interpretation and reconstruction of the very high acceleration fault zone 16 station record from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S119-S128.
34. Shakal, A., H. Haddadi, V. Graizer, K. Lin, and M. Huang (2006). Some key features of the strong-motion data from the M 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake of 28 September 2004, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S90-S118.
35. Spudich, P., and D. P. Miller (1990). Seismic site effects and the spatial interpolation of earthquake seismograms: results using aftershocks of the 1986 North Palm Springs, California, earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, no. 6, 1504-1532.
36. Thurber, C., S. Roecker, K. Roberts, M. Gold, L. Powell, and K. Rittger (2003). Earthquake locations and three-dimensional fault zone structure along the creeping section of the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, CA: preparing for SAFOD, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1112, doi 10.1029/ 2002GL016004.
37. Thurber, C., H. Zhang, F. Waldhauser, J. Hardebeck, A. Michael, and D. Eberhart-Phillips (2006). Three-dimensional compressional wavespeed model, earthquake relocations, and focal mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, region, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, no. 4B, S38S49.
38. Unsworth, M., and P. A. Bedrosian (2004). Electrical resistivity structure at the SAFOD site from magnetotelluric exploration, Geophys. Res. Lett. no. 31, 12, L12S05. doi 10.1029/2003GL019405.
39. Waldhauser, F., W. L. Ellsworth, D. P. Schaff, and A. Cole (2004). Streaks, multiplets, and holes: high-resolution spatio-temporal behavior of Parkfield seismicity, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, no. 18, L18.608, doi 10.1029/0JGREA0000890000B5003051000001.
40. Wallace, R. E. (1990). The San Andreas fault system, California, U.S. Geol. Surv: Prof. Paper 1515.
41. Zhu, L., and L. A. Rivera (2002). A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multilayered media, Geophys. J. Int. 148, 619-627, doi 10.1046/J.1365246X.2002.01610.x.