Isozyme variation in four natural populations of Cedrus libani A.Rich. in Turkey

Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 137-145

  Kurt, Yusuf ^a   Kaya, Nuray ^a   Işik, Kani ^a  

^a AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Genetic variation; Geographical variation; Starch gel electrophoresis; Taurus cedar

Indexed keywords

ELECTROPHORESIS; ENZYMES; GENES; POLYMORPHISM; SEED;

GENETIC VARIATION; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; ISOENZYME ANALYSES;

SOFTWOODS;

ALLELE; CONIFEROUS TREE; ELECTROKINESIS; ENZYME; GAMETOPHYTE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HETEROZYGOSITY;

ALLELES; CEDRUS LIBANI; ELECTROPHORESIS; ENZYMES; GENES; SEEDS;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

CEDRUS; CEDRUS LIBANI;

EID: 42049121957     PISSN: 1300011X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3906/tar-0710-14     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allendorf, W., K.L. Knudsen and G.M. Blake. 1982. Frequencies of null alleles at enzyme loci in natural populations of ponderosa and red pine. Genetics. 100: 497-504.
2. Bariteau, M., K.P. Panetsos, O. M'hint and A. Scaltsoyiannes. 1999. Genetic variation of the Atlas Cedar compared to that other Mediterranean cedars. Forets Mediterranneennes, t. XX, no 4, pp. 175-190.
3. Boydak, M. 1996. Ecology and Silviculture of Cedar of Lebanon (Cedrus libani A.Rich.) and Conservation of its Natural Forests. Publication No: 12, Ministry of Forestry, p. 68, Ankara.
4. Boydak, M. 2003. Regeneration of Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A.Rich.) on karstic lands in Turkey. Forest Ecology and Management. 178: 231-243.
5. Bou dagher-Kharrat, M., S. Mariette, B. Fady, F. Lefevre, G. Grenier, C. Plomion and S. Arnould. 2001. Analysis of Cedrus genetic geographic diversity using AFLPs. In: Proceedings of Wood, breeding, biotechnology and industrial expectation (Ed. C. Plomion), June 2001, p. 93. Bordeaux, France.
6. Bou dagher-Kharrat, M., S. Mariette, F. Lefevre, B. Fady, G.G. March, C. Plomion and A. Savoure. 2007. Geographical diversity and genetic relationships among Cedrus species estimated by AFLP. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 3: 275-285.
7. Bradshaw, A.D. 1972. Some of the evolutionary consequences of being a plant. In: Evolutionary Biology 5 (Eds.: T. Dobzhansky, M.K. Hecht and W.C. Stere) Appl. Century Crofts, New York. pp. 25-47.
8. Brown, A.D.H. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theoretical Population Biology. 15: 1-42.
9. Buth, D.G. and R.W. Murphy. 11999. The use of isozyme characters in systematic studies. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 27: 117-129.
10. Cheliak, W.M. and J.A. Pitel. 1984. Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from forest tree species. In: Information Report PI-X-42, Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Chalk River, Ontario. p. 49.
11. Conkle, M.T., P.O. Hodgskiss, L.B. Nunnally and S.C. Hunter. 1982. Starch gel electrophoresis of conifer seeds: A laboratory manual. U.S.D.A. Gen. Techn. Rept. PSW-64, p. 18.
12. Fady, B., M. Bariteau, D. Fallour, E. Giroud and F. Lefevre. 2000. Isozyme gene markers and taxonomy of Mediterranean Cedrus species. In: Proceedings of the First Conference of the European Union Joint Research Project FAIR CE 95-0097 (Adaptation and Selection of Mediterranean Pinus and Cedrus for Sustainable Afforestation of Marginal Lands), Mytilene, Greece. pp. 21-26.
13. Fady, B., F. Lefevre, M. Reynaud, G.G. Vendramin, M. Bou dagher-Kharrat, M. Anzidei, R. Pastorelli, A. Savoure and M. Bariteau. 2003. Gene flow among different taxonomic units: evidence from nuclear and cytoplasmic markers in Cedrus plantation forests. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 1132-1138.
14. Fady, B., F. Lefevre, G.G. Vendramin, A. Ambert, C. Regnier and M. Bariteau. 2008. Genetic consequences of past dlimate and human impact on eastern Mediterranean Cedrus libani forest: Implications for their conservation. Conservation Genetics. 9: 85-95.
15. Fallour, D., B. Fady and F. Lefevre. 1997. Study on isozyme variation in Pinus pinea L.: Evidence for low polymorphism. Silvae Genetica. 46: 201-207.
16. Fallour, D., B. Fady and F. Lefevre. 2001. Evidence of variation in segregation patterns within a Cedrus population. The American Genetic Association. 92: 260-266.
17. Feret, P.P. and F. Bergmann. 1976. Gel electrophoresis of proteins and enzymes. In: Modern Methods in Forest Genetics (Ed.: J.P. Miksche), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 49-77.
18. Giannini, R., M. Morgante and G.G. Vendramin. 1991. Allozyme variation in Italian populations of Picea abies (L.) Karst. Silvae Genetica. 40: 160-166.
19. Gülbaba, A.G. and N. Özkurt. 2002. Isozyme diversity in Cedar ( Cedrus libani A. Rich.) populations sampled from the Bolkar mountains. Ministry of Forestry, publication no: 191, Eastern Mediterranean Forestry Research Institute Publ. no: 23, Tech. Bull. no: 14, p. 30 (in Turkish, English summary).
20. Hamrick, J.L., M.J.W. Godt and S.L. Shermann-Broyles. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests. 6: 95-124.
21. Işik, K. and T. Yildirim. 1990. Strategies for conservation of forest gene resources and some recommendations on Cedrus libani. In: Proceeding of International Cedar Symposium. Oct. 22-27, Antalya. Forest Res. Inst. Publ. No: 59, pp: 342-352.
22. Kantarci, M.D. 1990. Ecological relations of Cedar forests in its distribution areas in Turkey. In: Proceedings of International Cedar Symposium, Oct. 22-27, Antalya. Forest Res. Inst. Publ. No: 59, pp: 12-25.
23. Kara, N. 1996. Investigations on isozyme variation in natural populations of Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.). M. Sc. Thesis, Akdeniz Univ. Biology Dept., Antalya, p. 77 (in Turkish, English summary).
24. Kara, N., L. Korol, K. Isik and G. Schiller. 1997. Genetic diversity in Pinus brutia Ten.: Altitudinal variation. Silvae Genetica. 46: 155-160.
25. Kayihan, G.C. 2000. The Genetic Structure of Cedrus fibani A. Rich Populations Determined by DNA Markers. MSc Thesis, METU Biology Dept., Ankara, p. 84.
26. Kayihan, G.C., Z. Kaya, G. Kandemir and S. Önde. 2006. The genetic structure of Cedrus libani A. Rich seed stands determined by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Forest Genetics. 12: 181-190.
27. Khuri, S., M.R. Shmoury, R. Baalbaki, M. Maunder and S.N. Talhouk. 2000. Conservation of the Cedrus libani populations in Lebanon: history, current status and experimental application of somatic embryogenesis. Biodiversity and Conservation. 9: 1261-1273.
28. Konnert, M., W. Ruetz and M. Fromm. 2001. Genetic variation in Acer pseudoplatanus L. I. inheritance of isozyme variants. Forest Genetics. 8: 25-37.
29. Kurt, Y. 2005. Determination of Genetic Variation in Natural Populations of. Taurus Cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). MSc Thesis, Akdeniz Univ. Biology Dept., Antalya, p. 74 (in Turkish, English summary).
30. Libby, W.J. 1973. Domestication strategies for forest trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2: 265-276.
31. Mosseler, A., D.J. Innes and B.A. Roberts. 1991. Lack of allozymic variation in disjunct Newfoundland populations of red pine (Pinus resinosa). Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 21: 525-528.
32. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Vol:70, No:12, Part I. pp: 3321-3323.
33. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 89: 583-590.
34. Orman Aǧaçlari ve Tohumlari Islah Araştirma Müdürlüǧü. 2004. 2003 yih şalişma raporu, 2004 yili çlişma programi, Ankara.
35. Panetsos, K.P., A. Christou and A. Scaltsoyiannes. 1992. First analysis on allozyme variation in cedar species (Cedrus sp.). Silvae Genetica. 41: 339-342.
36. Panetsos, K.P., A. Scaltsoyiannes and M. Tsaktsira. 1994. Genetic variation in allozymes of Cedrus libani A.Rich and Cedrus atlantica Mannetti. Annales de la Recherche Forestiere au Maroc. 27: 420-434.
37. Piola, F., R. Rohr and P. Heizman. 1999. Rapid detection of genetic variation within and among in vitro propagated cedar clones. Plant Science. 141: 159-163.
38. Rogers, S.O. and Z. Kaya. 2006. DNA from ancient cedar wood from King Midas Tomb, Turkey, and Al-Aksa Mosque,. Israel. Silvae Genetica. 55: 54-62.
39. Renau-Morata, B., S.G. Nebauer, E. Sales, J. Allainguillaume, P. Caligari and J. Segura. 2005. Genetic diversity and structure of natural and managed populations of Cedrus atlantica (Pinaceae) assessed using random amplified polymorphic DNA. American Journal of Botany. 92: 875-884.
40. Scaltsoyiannes, A. 1999. Allozyme differentiation and phylogeny of cedar species. Silvae Genetica. 48: 61-68.
41. Sneath, P.M.A. and R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, p. 573.
42. Swofford, D.L. and R.B. Salender. 1981. BIOSYS-1: A Fortran program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. The Journal of Heredity. 72: 281-283.
43. Takos, I. and T. Merou. 2001. Effect of storage conditions and treatment on germination of Cedrus deodara, Loud. and Cedrus libani A. Rich. Silvae Genetica. 50: 5-6.
44. Timerjanov, S.H.A. 1997. Lack of allozyme variation in Larik sukaczewii DYL. from the Southern Urals. Silvae Genetica. 46: 2-3.
45. Weber, J.C. and R.F. Stettler. 1981. Isoenzyme variation among ten populations of Populus trihocarpa Torr. et Gray. in the Pacific Northwest. Silvae Genetica. 30: 82-87.
46. Yahyaoǧlu, Z., I. Turna and F. Çakmak. 1997. Genetic analysis of isozymes variation in Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). In: Abstracts, Proc. XI. World Forestry Congress, 13-22 Oct., Antalya. pp. 230.