Whose Body (Of Opinion) is it Anyway? Historicizing Tissue Ownership and Examining 'Public Opinion' in Bioethics

Advances in Medical Sociology

Volumn 9, Issue , 2007, Pages 9-32

  Wilson, Duncan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41949095158     PISSN: 10576290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1057-6290(07)09001-8     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. Andrews, L. B. (1986, October). My body, my property. Hastings Centre Report, pp. 28-38.
2. Anon. (1970a, 18 May). Unborn babies: Now doctors may get new code of ethics. Daily Express.
3. Anon. (1970b, 19 May). Use of live foetus backed. The Times.
4. Anon. Human tissue as alternative in biomedical research. ATLA 14 (1987) 375-385
5. Bauer M.W. Public perceptions and the mass media in the biotechnology controversy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 1 (2005) 4-22
6. Bauer M.W., and Gaskell G. Toward a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 2 (1999) 163-186
7. Belkin G.S. Moving beyond bioethics: History and the search for medical humanism. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47 3 (2004) 372-385
8. Blake S. Patient sues to title to own cells. Nature 311 (1984) 198
9. Bookchin D., and Schumacher J. The virus and the vaccine (2004), St. Martin's Press, New York
10. Boseley, S. (2002, 17 December). Alder Hey scandal has hampered child cancer research says charity. The Guardian.
11. Brahams D. A disputed spleen. The Lancet 332 (1988) 1151-1152
12. Brahams D. Ownership of a spleen. The Lancet 336 (1990) 239
13. Caplan A.L. Blood, sweat, tears and profits: The ethics of the sale and use of patient derived materials in biomedicine. Clinical Research 33 4 (1985) 448-451
14. Casper. (1998). The making of the unborn patient. New Brunswick.
15. Chedd G. Whose grave?. New Scientist 63 (1974) 91-92
16. Clark A. Research materials and reproductive science in the United States, 1910-1940. In: Geison G.L. (Ed). Physiology in the American context, 1850-1940 (1987), American Physiology Society, Baltimore 323-350
17. Clark A., and Montini T. The many faces of RU486: Tales of situated knowledges and technological contestations. Science, Technology and Human Values 18 1 (1993) 42-78
18. Cooter, R. (2000). The ethical body. In: Cooter & Pickstone (Eds), Medicine in the twentieth century (pp. 451-69).
19. Culliton B.J. Grave-robbing: The charge against four from Boston city hospital. Science 186 (1974) 420-423
20. Culliton B.J. Patient sues UCLA over cell line. Science 225 (1984) 1458
21. Curran W.J. Scientific and commercial development of cell lines: Issues of property, ethics, and conflict of interest. New England Journal of Medicine 324 1 (1991) 998-1000
22. Department of Health and Social Security, Scottish Home and Health Department, Welsh Office. The use of foetuses and foetal material for research: Report of the advisory group (1972), HMSO, London
23. Dickens B.M. The control of living body materials. University of Toronto Law Journal 27 (1977) 142-198
24. Durbach N. Bodily matters: The antivaccination movement in England, 1853-1907 (2005), Duke University Press, Durham and London
25. Edwards C.C. Fetal research. Science 185 (1974) 900
26. Enders J.F. Fetal experimentation. New England Journal of Medicine 290 (1974) 1199
27. Erin C.A. Who owns Mo? Using historical entitlement theory to decide the ownership of human derived cell lines. In: Dyson A., and Harris J. (Eds). Ethics and biotechnology (1994), Routledge, London 157-178
28. Foucault M. The history of sexuality, volume one: The will to know (1998), Penguin Press, London
29. Fox R.C. The evolution of American bioethics: A sociological perspective. In: Weisz G. (Ed). Social science perspectives on medical ethics (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 201-217
30. Gold E.R. Body parts: Property rights and the ownership of human biological materials (1997), Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.
31. Gregory J., and Miller S. Science in public: Communication, culture, credibility (1998), Basic Books, Cambridge, Mass
32. Gurney J., and Balls M. Obtaining human tissues for research and testing: Practical problems and public attitudes in Britain. In: Rogiers V., Sonck W., Shepard E., and Vercruysse A. (Eds). Human cells in in vitro pharmaco-toxicology: Present status within Europe (1993), VUB Press, Brussels 315-328
33. Harris J. Clones, genes and immortality: Ethics and the genetic revolution (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford pp. 267-76
34. Hart D.S. Fetal research and antiabortion politics: Holding science hostage. Family Planning Perspectives 7 2 (1975) 72-82
35. Hayflick L. A novel technique for transforming the theft of mortal human cells into praiseworthy federal policy. Experimental Gerontology 33 (1998) 191-207
36. Hayflick, L. (2004, 23 December). Correspondence with the author.
37. Hayflick, L. (2005, 3 March). Correspondence with the author.
38. Hedgecoe A.M. Critical bioethics: Beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics 18 2 (2004) 120-143
39. Hegarty T. The fund for replacement of animals in medical experiments: The first 25 years. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 23 (1995) 19-32
40. Hinsliff, G., & Mckie, R. (2004, 6 June). Doctors beat curbs on tissue research. The Observer.
41. Holder A.R., and Levine R.J. Informed consent for research on specimens obtained from at autopsy or surgery: A case study in the overprotection of human subjects. Clinical Research 24 (1976) 68-77
42. Jones J.H. Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment (1981), Free Press, London
43. Josefson D. U.S. hospitals to ask patients for right to sell their tissue. British Medical Journal 321 (2000) 653
44. Kevles. Diamond v. Chakrabarty and beyond. In: Thackray A. (Ed). Private science: Biotechnology and the rise of the molecular sciences (1998), University of Pennysylvania Press, Philadelphia 65-79
45. Kimbrell A. The human body shop: The cloning, engineering, and marketing of life (1997), Regnery Publishing, Washington, D.C. p. xi
46. Kleinman A. Moral experience and ethical reflection: Can ethnography reconcile them? A quandry for 'the new bioethics'. Daedalus 128 4 (1999) 69-98
47. Koprowski H. Live poliomyelitis virus vaccines: Present status and problems for the future. Journal of the American Medical Association 178 (1961) 1151-1155
48. Lally J.J., Makarushka J.L., and Sullivan D. Research on human subjects: Problems of social control in medical experimentation (1979), Transaction Books, New York
49. Landecker H. Between beneficence and chattel: The human biological in law and science. Science in Context 12 (1999) 203-225
50. Landecker H. Immortality, in vitro: A history of the HeLa cell line. In: Brodwin P. (Ed). Biotechnology and culture: Bodies, anxieties, ethics (2000), Indiana University Press, Bloomington 53-72
51. Lawrence S.C. Beyond the grave - The use and meaning of human body parts: A historical introduction. In: Weir R.F. (Ed). Stored tissue samples: Ethical, legal and public policy implications (1998), University of Iowa Press, Iowa City 111-143
52. Lopez J. How sociology can save bioethics. Maybe. Sociology of Health and Illness 26 7 (2004) 875-896
53. Mason J.K., McCall Smith R.A., and Laurie G. Law and medical ethics. 6th ed., p. 457 (2002), Butterworths, Edinburgh and London
54. Mason K., and Laurie G. Consent or property? Dealing with the body and its parts in the shadow of Bristol and Alder Hey. Modern Law Review 64 5 (2001) 710-729
55. Montgomery Jr. P.OB., Cook J.E., Reynolds R.C., Paul J.S., Hayflick L., Stock D., Schulz W.W., Kimsey S., Thirlof R.G., Rogers T., and Campbell D. The response of single human cells to zero gravity. In Vitro 14 2 (1978) 165-173
56. Morgan L.M. Properly disposed of: A history of embryo disposal and the changing claims on foetal remains. Medical Anthropology 21 (2002) 247-274
57. Morrison R.S., and Twiss S.B. The human foetus as research material. Hastings Centre Report 4 (1973) 8-10
58. Nardone, R. M. (2005, 18 February). Personal correspondence with the author.
59. National Academy of Science. Experiments and research with humans: Values in conflict (1975), National Academy of Science, Washington
60. Nelkin D. Science as intellectual property (1984), Macmillan, London p. 10
61. Nelkin D., and Andrews L. Whose body is it anyway? Disputes over body tissue in a biotechnology age. The Lancet 351 (1998) 53-57
62. Nelkin D., and Andrews L. Body bazaar: The market for human tissue in the biotechnology age (2000), Crown Publishers, New York
63. Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States. (1987). Ownership of human tissues and cells: New developments in biotechnology. New York: Books for Business.
64. Otten, A. (1986, 29 January). Researchers' use of blood, bodily tissues raises questions about sharing profits. Wall Street Journal.
65. Parry B. Trading the genome: Investigating the commodification of bio-information (2004), Columbia University Press, New York
66. Perley S.N. From control over one's body to control over one's part: Extending the doctrine of informed consent. New York University Law Review 67 (1992) 335-365
67. Petchesky R.P. Foetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. In: Stanworth M. (Ed). Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood and medicine (1987), Polity Press, Cambridge 57-81
68. Pfeffer N. Fertility counts: From equity to outcome. In: Sturdy (Ed). Medicine, health and the public sphere in Britain, 1600-2000 (2000), Routledge, London 260-279
69. Pfeffer N. Pioneers of infertility treatment. In: Conway A., and Hardy L. (Eds). Women and modern medicine (2001), Rodopi Press, Amsterdam 254-261
70. Rabinow P. Severing the ties: Fragmentation and redemption in late modernity. In: Rabinow (Ed). Essays on the anthropology of reason (1996), Princeton University Press, Princeton 129-153
71. Rabinow P. Making PCR: A story of biotechnology (1996), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
72. Rabinow P., and Rose N. Biopower today. Biosocieties 1 (2006) 195-217
73. Ramsey P. The ethics of fetal research (1975), Yale University Press, New Haven and London
74. Richardson R. Death dissection and the destitute. 2nd edn. (2001), Pheonix Press, London
75. Risen J., and Thomas J.L. The wrath of angels: the American abortion war (1998), Basic Books, New York
76. Rose N. The politics of life itself. Theory, culture and society 18 6 (2001) 1-30
77. Rose N. The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century (2007), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
78. Rosenberg C.E. Meanings, policies, and medicine: On the bioethical enterprise and history. Daedalus 128 4 (1999) 27-46
79. Rosenberg L.E. Using patient materials for product development: A dean's perspective. Clinical Research 33 4 (1985) 452-454
80. Royston I. Cell lines from human patients: Who owns them?. Clinical Research 33 4 (1985) 442-443
81. Sandbrook D. White heat: A history of Britain in the swinging sixties (2006), Little, Brown, London
82. Schmeck Jr., H. M. (1976, 28 March). Investigator says scientist sold cell specimens owned by US. New York Times. Emphasis added.
83. Shapo M. Legal responsibilities at issue - Emphasis on informed consent. In Vitro 13 10 (1977) 613-631
84. Skloot, R. (2006, 16 April). Taking the least of you. New York Times Magazine.
85. Squier S. Liminal lives: Imagining the human at the frontier of biomedicine (2004), Duke University Press, Durham and London
86. Stanhope, H. (1970, 16 May). Live Foetuses Sold for Research - MP. The Times.
87. Start R.D., Brown W., Bryant R.J., Reed M.W., Cross S.S., Kent G., and Underwood J.C.E. Ownership and uses of human tissue: Does the Nuffield bioethics report accord with opinion of surgical inpatients?. British Medical Journal 313 (1996) 1366-1368
88. Steinberg A.G. The social control of science. In: Milunsky A., and Annas G. (Eds). Genetics and the law (1975), Plenum Press, New York 314
89. In: Sturdy S. (Ed). Medicine, health and the public sphere in Britain (2000), Routledge, London
90. Sun M. Scientists settle cell line dispute. Science 220 (1983) 393-394
91. Tallerico C.A. The autonomy of the human body in the age of biotechnology. University of Colorado Law Review 61 (1990) 659-680
92. The Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Human tissue: Legal and ethical issues (1995), Nuffield Council, London
93. Tina Stevens M.L. Bioethics in America: Origins and cultural politics (2003), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
94. Turney J. Frankenstein's footsteps: Science, genetics and popular culture (1998), Yale University Press, London
95. Tutton R. Person, property and gift: Exploring languages of tissue donation. In: Tutton R., and Corrigan O. (Eds). Genetic databases: Socio-ethical issues in the collection and storage of DNA (2004), Routledge, London 19-39
96. Van Dijck J. Imagenation: Popular images of genetics (1998), Macmillan, Basingstoke
97. Vincent D. The culture of secrecy: Britain, 1832-1998 (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford
98. Wade N. Hayflick's tragedy: The rise and fall of a human cell line. Science 192 (1976) 125-127
99. Wade N. University and drug firm battle over billion-dollar gene. Science 209 (1980) 1492-1494
100. Waldby C., and Mitchell R. Tissue economies: Blood, organs and cell lines in late capitalism (2006), Duke University Press, Durham and London
101. In: Weir R.F. (Ed). Stored tissue samples: Ethical, legal, and public policy implications (1998), University of Iowa Press, Iowa City
102. Weir R.F., and Olick R.S. The stored tissue issue: Biomedical research, ethics and law in the era of genomic medicine (2004), Oxford University Press, New York
103. Wellcome Trust and the Medical Research Council. Public perceptions of the collection of human biological samples (2000), Wellcome, MRC, London
104. Wells, J. A., & Kerr, D. (2000). Mini-hearings on issues in human tissue storage. In: National bioethics advisory commission, research involving human biological materials: Ethical issues and policy guidance (National Bioethics Advisory Commission) (pp. 41-53). Rockville, MD.
105. Wilkinson S. Bodies for sale: Ethics and exploitation in the human body trade (2003), Routledge, London
106. Wilson D. The early history of tissue culture in Britain: The interwar years. Social History of Medicine 18 2 (2005) 225-245
107. Winslade W.J. An overview of the scientist's responsibilities: Comments by an attorney. In Vitro 13 10 (1977) 712-727
108. Wolpe P.R. The triumph of autonomy in bioethics: A sociological view. In: DeVries R., and Subedi J. (Eds). Bioethics and society: Constructing the ethical enterprise (1998), Prentice Hall, London 38-60
109. Wright Jr. J. The development of the frozen section technique, the evolution of surgical biopsy, and the origins of surgical pathology. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 59 3 (1985) 295-326
110. Yoxen E. Historical perspectives on human embryo research. In: Dyson A., and Harris J. (Eds). Experiments on embryos (1990), Routledge, London 27-39