|
Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1236-
|
Last Word on Point:Counterpoint: High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME;
ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION;
HIGH FREQUENCY OSCILLATION;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
MAMMAL;
NONHUMAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
TIDAL VOLUME;
TREATMENT INDICATION;
ADULT;
HIGH FREQUENCY VENTILATION;
NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME;
NEWBORN;
NOTE;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
ADULT;
HIGH-FREQUENCY JET VENTILATION;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, ADULT;
RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN;
|
EID: 41949090854
PISSN: 87507587
EISSN: 15221601
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00153.2008 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (6)
|