|
|
Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2008, Pages
|
|
Counterpoint: High-frequency ventilation is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME;
HIGH FREQUENCY VENTILATION;
HUMAN;
NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME;
NEWBORN;
NOTE;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
ADULT;
HIGH-FREQUENCY JET VENTILATION;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, ADULT;
RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN;
|
|
EID: 45149087557
PISSN: 87507587
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01226.2007a Document Type: Note |
|
Times cited : (12)
|
|
References (0)
|
