Point:Counterpoint: High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients

Journal of Applied Physiology

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1230-1235

  Ferguson, Niall D ^a,b   Slutsky, Arthur S ^a,c   Kacmarek, Robert M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOKINE; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA; OXYGEN;

ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING RATE; HIGH FREQUENCY OSCILLATION; HIGH FREQUENCY VENTILATION; HUMAN; LUNG INJURY; MEDIATOR RELEASE; MORTALITY; OXYGEN TOXICITY; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VENTILATOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; EXPIRATORY RESERVE VOLUME; INTENSIVE CARE; NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; NEWBORN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; EXPIRATORY RESERVE VOLUME; HIGH-FREQUENCY JET VENTILATION; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE; OXYGEN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, ADULT; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN;

EID: 41949103964     PISSN: 87507587     EISSN: 15221601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01226.2007     Document Type: Review

References (0)