A molecular phylogeny of Santalaceae (Santalales)

Systematic Botany

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 107-116

  Der, Joshua P ^a,b   Nickrent, Daniel L ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Eremolepidaceae; Mistletoe; Parasitic plant; Sandalwood; Viscaceae

Indexed keywords

AMPHOROGYNE; COMANDRA; OPILIACEAE; SANTALACEAE; SANTALALES; SANTALUM; SCHOEPFIA; SCHOEPFIACEAE; THESIUM (ANGIOSPERM); VISCUM ALBUM;

EID: 41849135092     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364408783887438     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions of Automatic Control 19: 716-723.
2. Altekar, G., S. Dwarkadas, J. Huelsenbeck, and F. Ronquist. 2004. Parallel Metropolis coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20: 407-415.
3. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 339-436.
4. Barlow, B. A. 1964. Classification of the Loranthaceae and Viscaceae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 89: 268-272.
5. Barlow, B. A. 1983. Biogeography of Loranthaceae and Viscaceae. Pp. 19-45 in The biology of mistletoes, ed. D. M. Calder and P. Bernhardt. New York: Academic Press.
6. Barlow, B. A. and D. Wiens. 1971. The cytogeography of the loranthaceous mistletoes. Taxon 20: 291-312.
7. Barlow, B. A. and D. Wiens. 1977. Host-parasite resemblance in Australian mistletoes: the case for cryptic mimicry. Evolution 31: 69-84.
8. Bhandari, N. N. and S. C. A. Vohra. 1983. Embryology and affinities of Viscaceae. Pp. 69-86 in The biology of mistletoes, ed. D. M. Calder and P. Bernhardt. New York: Academic Press.
9. Bhatnagar, S. P. 1960. Morphological and embryological studies in the family Santalaceae. IV. Mida salicifolia A. Cunn. Phytomorphology 10: 198-207.
10. Brown, R. 1810. Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van-Diemen. London: Johnson.
11. Burnham, K. P. and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Carvell, W. N. and W. H. Eshbaugh. 1982. A systematic study of the genus Buckleya (Santalaceae). Castanea 47: 17-37.
13. Danser, B. H. 1939. A revision of the genus Phacellaria (Santalaceae). Blumea 3: 212-235.
14. Danser, B. H. 1940. On some genera of Santalaceae Osyrideae from the Malay Archipelago, mainly from New Guinea. Nova Guinea, New Series 4: 133-149.
15. Danser, B. H. 1955. Supplementary notes on the Santalaceous genera Dendromyza and Cladomyza. Nova Guinea, New Series 6: 261-277.
16. Dawson, G. 1944. Las Santaláceas Argentinas. Extracto de la Revista del Museo de La Plata (Nueva Serie). Seccion Botanica 6: 5-80.
17. Der, J. P. 2005. Molecular phylogenetics and classification of Santalaceae. M.S. thesis. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.
18. Fernald, M. L. 1928. Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University, No. LXXIX. I. Geocaulon, a new genus of the Santalaceae. Rhodora 30: 21-24.
19. Felsenstein, J. 1973. Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Systematic Zoology 22: 240-249.
20. Fineran, B. A. 1991. Root hemi-parasitism in the Santalales. Botanische Jahrbücher 113: 277-308.
21. Francisco-Ortega, J., A. Santos-Guerra, S.-C. Kim, and D. J. Crawford. 2000. Plant genetic diversity in the Canary Islands: a conservation perspective. American Journal of Botany 87: 909-919.
22. Guindon, S. and O. Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696-704.
23. Harbaugh, D. T. and B. G. Baldwin. 2006. Unraveling the complex history of sandalwoods (Santalum, Santalaceae). Abstract 114. Botany 2006. Chico, California: Botanical Society of America. http://www.2006. botanyconference.org/engine/search/index.php?func=detail&aid=114
24. Harbaugh, D. T. and B. G. Baldwin. 2007. Phylogeny and biogeography of the sandalwoods (Santalum, Santalaceae): repeated dispersals throughout the Pacific. American Journal of Botany 94: 1030-1042.
25. Hendrych, R. 1972. The natural history and systematics of the genus Thesium L. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Biologica 1970: 293-358.
26. Hewson, H. J. and A. S. George. 1984. Santalaceae. Pp. 29-67 in Flora of Australia, ed. A. S. George. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
27. Hiepko, P. 1979. A revision of Opiliaceae I. Genera of the eastern Old World, excluding Opilia. Willdenowia 9: 13-56.
28. Hiepko, P. 1982. A revision of Opiliaceae II. Opilia Roxb. Willdenowia 12: 161-182.
29. Hiepko, P. 1985. A revision of Opiliaceae III. Urobotrya Stapf. Botanische Jahrbücher 107: 137-152.
30. Hiepko, P. 1987. A revision of Opiliaceae IV. Rhopalopilia Pierre and Pentarhopalopilia (Engler) Hiepko gen. nov. Botanische Jahrbücher 108: 271-291.
31. Hiepko, P. 2000. Opiliaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 82: 1-53.
32. Hieronymus, G. 1889. Santalaceae. Pp. 202-227 in Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, eds. A. Engler and K. Prantl. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
33. Hilu, K. W., T. Borsch, K. Muller, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, V. Savolainen, M. W. Chase, M. P. Powell, L. A. Alice, R. Evans, H. Sauquet, C. Neinhuis, T. A. B. Slotta, J. G. Rohwer, C. S. Campbell, and L. W. Chatrou. 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. American Journal of Botany 90: 1758-1776.
34. Hürlimann, H. and H. U. Stauffer. 1957. Santalales-Studien II. Daenikera, eine neue Santalaceen-Gattung. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 102: 332-336.
35. Johri, B. M. and S. P. Bhatnagar. 1960. Embryology and taxonomy of the Santalales I. Proceedings of the National Institute of Science, India, Part 26B, Biological Sciences 26: 199-220.
36. Judd, W. S. and R. G. Olmstead. 2004. A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships. American Journal of Botany 91: 1627-1644.
37. Judd, W. S., C. S. Campbell, E. A. Kellogg, P. F. Stevens, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach, Ed. 2. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
38. Jukes, T. H. and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pp. 21-132 in Mammalian protein metabolism vol. 3, ed. H. N. Munro. New York, Academic Press.
39. Kuijt, J. 1968. Mutual affinities of Santalalean families. Brittonia 20: 136-147.
40. Kuijt, J. 1969. The biology of parasitic flowering plants. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41. Kuijt, J. 1988. Monograph of Eremolepidaceae. Systematic Botany Monographs 18: 1-60.
42. Kuijt, J. 2003. Monograph of Phoradendron (Viscaceae). Systematic Botany Monographs 66: 1-643.
43. Lam, H. J. 1945. Fragmenta Papuana. Sargentia 5: 1-196.
44. Leopold, D. J. and R. N. Muller. 1983. Hosts of Pyrularia pubera Michx. (Santalaceae) in the field and in culture. Castanea 48: 138-145.
45. Lepschi, B. J. 1999. Taxonomic revision of Leptomeria (Santalaceae). Australian Systematic Botany 12: 55-100.
46. Li, J., D. E. Boufford, and M. J. Donoghue. 2001. Phylogenetics of Buckleya (Santalaceae) based on its sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Rhodora 103: 137-150.
47. Macklin, J. 2000. A systematic revision of the Santalaceae R. Br. of Southeast Asia. Ph.D. dissertation. Dublin, Ireland: Trinity College.
48. Macklin, J. and J. Parnell. 2000. An introduction to the Santalaceae R. Br. of Thailand. Thailand Forestry Bulletin 28: 112-122.
49. Macklin, J. and J. Parnell. 2002. An account of the Santalaceae of Thailand. Thailand Forestry Bulletin 30: 75-115.
50. Malécot, V. and D. L. Nickrent. 2008. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of Olacaceae and related Santalales. Systematic Botany 33: in press.
51. Nickrent, D. L. 1994. From field to film: rapid sequencing methods for field collected plant species. BioTechniques 16: 470-475.
52. Nickrent, D. L. 1997 - onward. The parasitic plant connection. http://www.parasiticplants.siu.edu/
53. Nickrent, D. L. 2002. Mistletoe phylogenetics: current relationships gained from analysis of DNA sequences. Pp. 48-57 in Proceedings of the forty-eighth western international forest disease work conference, ed. P. Angwin. Redding, California: USDA Forest Service.
54. Nickrent, D. L. and R. J. Duff. 1996. Molecular studies of parasitic plants using ribosomal RNA. Pp. 28-52 in Advances in parasitic plant research, eds. M. T. Moreno, J. I. Cubero, D. Berner, D. Joel, L. J. Musselman, and C. Parker. Cordoba, Spain: Junta de Andalucia, Dirección General de Investigación Agraria.
55. Nickrent, D. L. and V. Malécot. 2001. A molecular phylogeny of Santalales. Pp. 69-74 in Proceedings of the 7th international parasitic weed symposium, eds. A. Fer, P. Thalouarn, D. M. Joel, L. J. Musselman, C. Parker, and J. A. C. Verkleij. Nantes, France: Faculté des Sciences, Université de Nantes.
56. Nickrent, D. L., J. Der, and F. Anderson. 2005. Discovery of the photosynthetic relatives of the "Maltese mushroom" Cynomorium. BMC Evolutionary Biology 5: 38.
57. Nickrent, D. L., R. J. Duff, A. E. Colwell, A. D. Wolfe, N. D. Young, K. E. Steiner, and C. W. Depamphilis. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic and evolutionary studies of parasitic plants. Pp. 211-241 in Molecular systematics of plants II. DNA sequencing, eds. D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis and J. J. Doyle. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
58. Pilger, R. 1935. Santalaceae. Pp.52-91 in Die natürlichen pflanzenfamilien. Ed. 2, vol. 16b, eds. A. Engler and K. Prantl. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
59. Posada, D. and T. R. Buckley. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53: 793-808.
60. Posada, D. and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 14: 817-818.
61. Ram, M. 1957. Morphological and embryological studies in the family Santalaceae. I. Comandra umbellata (L.) Nutt. Phytomorphology 7: 24-35.
62. Rambaut, A. 2004. Se-Al: sequence alignment editor v2.0a11. Oxford: Department of Zoology, University of Oxford. http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk
63. Rao, L. N. 1942a. Parasitism in the Santalaceae. Annals of Botany 6: 131-150.
64. Rao, L. N. 1942b. Studies in the Santalaceae. Annals of Botany 6: 151-177.
65. Rendle, A. B. 1925. The classification of flowering plants vol. 2. Dicotyledons. London: Cambridge University Press.
66. Rogers, Z. S., D. L. Nickrent, and V. Malécot. New arborescent Santalaceae from Madagascar. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden (In press).
67. Ronquist, F. and J. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19: 1572-1574.
68. Schwarz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6: 461-464.
69. Skottsberg, C. 1930. The geographic distribution of the sandal-woods and its significance. Pp. 435-442 in Proceedings of the fourth Pacific science congress vol. 3, ed. O. de Vries, H.J. Lam and H.J.T. Bijlmer. Batavia and Bandoeng, Java, Indonesia: Pacific Science Association.
70. Smith, A. C. 1937. A Colombian species of Cervantesia R. & P. Tropical Woods 51: 12-14.
71. Smith, F. H. and E. C. Smith. 1943. Floral anatomy of the Santalaceae and related forms. Oregon State Monographs, Studies in Botany 5: 1-93.
72. Soltis, D. E., A. E. Senters, M. Zanis, S. Kim, J. D. Thompson, P. S. Soltis, L. P. Rosnse De Craene, and J. S. Farris. 2003. Gunnerales are sister to other core eudicots: implications for the evolution of pentamery. American Journal of Botany 90: 461-470.
73. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. W. Chase, M. E. Mort, D. C. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolainen, W. H. Hahn, S. B. Hoot, M. F. Fay, M. Axtell, S. M. Swensen, L. M. Prance, W. J. Kress, K. C. Nixon, and J. S. Farris. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society London 133: 381-461.
74. Stauffer, H. U. 1957. Santalales-Studien I. Zur Stellung der Gattung Okoubaka Pellegrin et Normand. Berliner Schweize Botanische Gesellschaft 67: 422-427.
75. Stauffer, H. U. 1959. Santalales-Studien IV. Revisio Anthobolearum; eine Morphologische Studie mit Einschluss der Geographie, Phylogenie und Taxonomie. Mitteilungen aus dem Botanischen Museum der Universität Zürich 213: 1-260.
76. Stauffer, H. U. 1961a. Beiträge zum Blütendiagramm der Santalales. Verhandlungen der Schweizerische Naturforschenden Gesellshaft 141: 123-125.
77. Stauffer, H. U. 1961b. Santalales-Studien VII. Sudamerikansche Santalaceae I. Acanthosyris, Cervantesia und Jodina. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 106: 406-412.
78. Stauffer, H. U. 1968. Santalales-Studien IX. Spirogardnera, eine neue Santalaceen-Gattung aus West-Australien. Mitteilungen aus dem Botanischen Museum der Universität Zürich 113: 305-309.
79. Stauffer, H. U. 1969. Santalales-Studien X. Amphorogyneae eine neue tribus der Santalaceae. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 114: 49-76.
80. Stauffer, H. U. and H. Hürlimann. 1957. Santalales-Studien III. Amphorogyne, eine weitere Santalaceen-Gattung aus Neukaledonien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 102: 337-349.
81. Stearn, W. T. 1960. An introduction to Robert Brown's Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae. Pp. v-lii in Historiae Naturalis Classica, Tomus VI: Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van-Diemen (1810) Supplementum Primum (1830) by Robert Brown, eds. J. Cramer and H. K. Swann. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.
82. Stearn, W. T. 1972. Kunkeliella, a new genus of Santalaceae in the Canary Islands. Cuaderno Botanica Canariensis 16: 11-26.
83. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0 beta 10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
84. Tavaré, S. 1986. Some probabalistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences 17: 57-86.
85. van Tieghem, P. 1896. Sur les Phanerogames a ovule sans nucelle, formant le group des Innucellees ou Santalinees. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 43: 543-577.
86. Yang, Z. 1993. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 1396-1401.
87. Yang, Z. and B. Rannala. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 717-724.