Evaluating remotely sensed techniques for mapping riparian vegetation

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Volumn 37, Issue 1-3, 2003, Pages 113-126

  Congalton, Russell G ^a   Birch, Kevin ^b   Jones, Rick ^c   Schriever, James ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY   (United States)

^c Pacific Meridian Resources   (United States)

Author keywords

Aerial photography; Remote sensing; Riparian mapping; Satellite imagery

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; HARDWOODS; PUBLIC POLICY; VEGETATION; WATERSHEDS;

WILDLIFE HABITAT;

AGRICULTURE;

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MAPPING; REMOTE SENSING; RIPARIAN VEGETATION;

CONIFEROPHYTA; RIPARIA;

EID: 0036900737     PISSN: 01681699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00108-4     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bauer, M., Burk, T., Ek, A., Coppin, P., Lime, S., Walsh, T., Walters, D., Befort, W., Heinzen, F., 1994. Satellite inventory of Minnesota forest resources. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60 (3), 287-298.
2. Byrne, M., 1996. California salmonid stream habitat inventory: A dynamic segmentation application. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual ESRI User Conference, Palm Springs, CA.
3. Chuvieco, E., Congalton, R., 1988. Using cluster analysis to improve the selection of training statistics in classifying remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54 (9), 1275-1281.
4. Congalton, R., Green, K., 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. CRC/Lewis Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 137.
5. Congalton, R., Green, K., Teply, J., 1993. Mapping old growth forests on National forest and park lands in the Pacific Northwest from remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 59 (4), 529-535.
6. Green, K., Bernath, S., Lackey, L., Brunengo, M., Smith, S., 1993. Analyzing the cumulative effects of forest practices: Where do we start. GeoInfo Systems 3 (2), 31-41.
7. Jensen, J., 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 316.
8. Landis, K., 1996. Integrating dynamic segmentation into publication quality transportation maps. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual ESRI User Conference, Palm Springs, CA, pp. 170-171.
9. Lorensen, T.C., Andrus, J.R., 1994. The Oregon Forest Practices Act Water Protection Rules: Scientific and Policy Considerations. Oregon Department of Forestry, p. 39.
10. Perone, S.M., 1997. Using dynamic segmentation to integrate transportation modeling networks with GIS. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual ESRI User Conference. San Diego, CA, pp. 417-423.
11. State of Oregon, Oregon Administrative Rules, 1972. Vegetation Retention Goals for Streams: Desired Future Conditions. OAR 629-640-000.
12. Wolter, P., Mladenoff, D., Host, G., Crow, T., 1995. Improved forest classification in the northern Lake States using multi-temporal Landsat imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61 (9), 1129-1143.