Urban land-cover change detection through sub-pixel imperviousness mapping using remotely sensed data

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 69, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1003-1010

  Yang, Limin ^a   Xian, George ^a   Klaver, Jacqueline M ^a   Deal, Brian ^b  

^a SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; MAPPING; REMOTE SENSING; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

CHARGE DETECTION METHODS;

PHOTOGRAMMETRY;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALGORITHM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSAT; PIXEL; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; URBAN AREA;

EID: 0042922539     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.69.9.1003     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Arnold, C.A., Jr., and CJ. Gibbons, 1996. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key urban environmental indicator, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2):243-258.
2. Breiman, L., J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone, 1984. Classification and Regression Trees, Chapman and Hall, New York, N.Y., 358 p.
3. Chen, J., P. Gong, C. He, W. Luo, M. Tamural, and P. Shi, 2002. Assessment of the urban development plan of Beijing by using a CA-based urban growth model, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 68(10):1063-1071.
4. Deguchi, C., and S. Sugio, 1994. Estimations for impervious areas by the use of remote sensing imagery, Water Science and Technology, 29(1-2):135-144.
5. Flanagan, M., and D.L. Civco, 2001. Subpixel impervious surface mapping, Proceedings, 2001 ASPRS Annual Convention, 23-27 April, St. Louis, Missouri (American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland), unpaginated CD-ROM.
6. Forster, B.C., 1980. Urban residential ground cover using Landsat digital data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 46(4):547-558.
7. Gomarasca, M.A., P.A. Brivio, F. Pagnoni, and A. Galli, 1993. One century of land use changes in the metropolitan area of Milan (Italy), International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14:211-223.
8. Green, K., D. Kempka, and L. Lackey, 1994. Using remote sensing to detect and monitor land-cover and land-use change, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60:331-337.
9. Huang, C., B. Wylie, L. Yang, C. Homer, G. Zylstra, 2002. Derivation of a tasseled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23:1741-1748.
10. Huang, C., and J.R.G. Townshend, 2003. A stepwise regression tree for nonlinear approximation: Applications to estimating subpixel land cover, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(1):75-90.
11. Irish, R.R., 2000. Landsat 7 Science Data User's Handbook, Report 430-15-01-003-0, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Maryland, http://ltpwww.gsfc.nasa.gov/IAS/handbook/handbook_toc.html, last accessed 27 May 2003.
12. Jantz, C.J., SJ. Goetz, A.J. Smith, and M. Shelly, 2003. Using the SLEUTH Urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on land use in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area, Environment and Planning (B), in press.
13. Jensen, J.R., 1995. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Second Edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 316 p.
14. Jensen, J.R., and D.C. Cowen, 1999. Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65:611-622.
15. Ji, M.H., and J.R. Jensen, 1999. Effectiveness of subpixel analysis in detecting and quantifying urban imperviousness from Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery, Geocarto International, 14(4): 31-39.
16. Johnston, A., and T.R. Watters, 1996. Assessing Spatial Growth of the Washington Metropolitan Area Using Thematic Mapper Data, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., http://www.nasm.edu:2020/CEPSDOCS/wash/washdc1.html, last accessed 27 May 2003.
17. Kam, T.S., 1995. Integrating GIS and remote sensing techniques for urban land-cover and land-use analysis, Geocarto International, 10:39-49.
18. Loveland, T.R., T.L. Sohl, S.V. Stehman, A.L. Gallant, K.L. Sayler, and D.E. Napton, 2002. A strategy for estimating the rates of recent United States land-cover changes, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 68(10):1091-1099.
19. Phinn, S.R., M. Stanford, P.T. Shyy, and A. Murray, 2000. A sub-pixel scale approach for monitoring the composition and condition of urban environments based on the (VIS) Vegetation-Impervious-Surface model, 10th Australasian Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Conference (ARSPC), 21-25 August, Adelaide, Australia (The Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Association of Australia), unpaginated CD-ROM.
20. Prisloe, S., Y.J. Lei, and J. Hurd, 2001. Interactive GIS-based impervious surface model, 2001 ASPRS Annual Convention, 23-27 April, St. Louis, Missouri (American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland), unpaginated CD-ROM.
21. Ridd, M.K., 1995. Exploring a V-I-S (Vegetation-Impervious surface-Soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: Comparative anatomy for cities, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16:2165-2185.
22. Ridd, M.K., and J.J. Liu, 1998. A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment, Remote Sensing of Environment, 63:95-100.
23. Rover, A., L. Charbonneau, and F. Bonn, 1988. Urbanization and Landsat MSS albedo change in the Windsor-Quebec corridor since 1972, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 9:555-566.
24. Schueler, T.R., 1994. The importance of imperviousness, Watershed Protection Techniques, 1(3):100-111.
25. Singh, A., 1989. Review article - Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10:989-1003.
26. Smith, A.J., S.J. Goetz, and S.D. Prince, 2003. Subpixel estimates of impervious surface cover from Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, in press.
27. Sohl, T.L., 1999. Change analysis in the United Arab Emirates: An investigation of techniques, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(4):475-484.
28. Todd, W. J., 1977. Urban and regional land use change detected by using Landsat data, Journal of Research by the U.S. Geological Survey, 5:527-534.
29. Vogelmann, J.E., D. Helder, T. Morfitt, M.J. Choate, J.W. Merchant, and H. Bulley, 2001. Effects of Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper and Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus radiometric and geometric calibrations and corrections on landscape characterization, Remote Sensing of Environment, 78:55-70.
30. th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, July, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Delft University Press, Delft, The Netherlands), pp. 723-730.
31. Ward, D., S.R. Phinn, and A.T. Murry, 2000. Monitoring growth in rapidly urbanized areas using remotely sensed data, Professional Geographer, 52(3):371-386.
32. Williams, D.J., and S.B. Norton, 2000. Determining impervious surfaces in satellite imagery using digital orthrophotography, Proceedings of the 2000 ASPRS Annual Conference, 22-26 May, Washington, D.C. (American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland), unpaginated CD-ROM.
33. Yang, L., C. Huang, C.G. Homer, B.K. Wylie, and M.J. Coan, 2003. An approach for mapping large-area impervious surfaces: Synergistic use of Landsat 7 ETM+ and high spatial resolution imagery, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(2):230-240.
34. Yang, X., and C.P. Lo, 2002. Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 9:1775-1798.