Is surface roughness of resin composites affected by operator's performance?

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 3-6

  Jung, Martin ^a   Otte, Andreia ^b   Klimek, Joachim ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Justus Liebig University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAMOND; HERCULITE XR; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; RUBBER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH BRUSHING;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL POLISHING; DIAMOND; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RESIN CEMENTS; RUBBER; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 41549112061     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kawai K, Urano M. Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 396-400.
2. Tjan AHL, Clayton AC. The polishability of posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 138-146.
3. De Jager N, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. The influence of surface roughness on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 381-388.
4. Graf A, Sindel J, Kern A, Petschelt A. Influence of surface roughness on strength of machinable materials. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 941 (Abstr 2480).
5. Yap AUJ, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 260-265.
6. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Rousson V. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater 2006; 22:146-165.
7. Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17: 102-108.
8. Jung M, Bruegger H, Klimek J. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 816-824.
9. Ryba TM, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 243-247.
10. Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 534-543.
11. Nagem Filho H, D'Azevedo MTFS, Nagem HD, Marsola FP. Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J 2003; 14:37-41.
12. Jung M, Voit S, Klimek J. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 53-59.
13. Özgünaltay G, Yazici AR, Görücü J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 218-224.
14. Jung M. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 98-104.
15. Kou W, Molin M, Sjogren G. Surface roughness of five different dental ceramic core materials after grinding and polishing. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 117-124.
16. Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NH. Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 79-86.
17. Leitão J, Hegdahl T. On the measuring of roughness. Acta Odontol Scand 1981; 39:379-384.
18. ISO-Standards. ISO 4287 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -Surface texture: Profile method - Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. In: International Organization for Standardization. International Standard ISO 4287. 1st ed, Geneve: 1997:1-25.
19. ISO-Standards. ISO 3274 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -Surface texture: Profile method - Nominal characteristics of contact (stylus) instruments. In: International Organization for Standardization. International Standard ISO 3274. 2nd ed, Geneve: 1996:1-13.
20. DIN-Normen. DIN 4762 Surface roughness; terminology, surface and its parameters. ISO 4287/1. In: Deutsches Institut für Normung. DIN Taschenbuch 106 Verzahnungsterminologie Normen (Antriebstechnik 1). 4th ed, Berlin, Wien, Zürich: Beuth Verlag GmbH, 1996: 334-349. (In German).
21. Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NH. Comparison of methods for measuring surface roughness of ceramic. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 421-427.
22. DIN-Normen. DIN 4772 Electrical contact (stylus) instruments for the measurement of surface roughness by the profile method, hi: Deutsches Institut für Normung. DIN Taschenbuch 11 Längenprüfiechnik 1 Grundnormen Meßgeräte. 8th ed, Berlin, Köln: Beuth Verlag GmbH, 1986: 228-236. (In German).
23. DIN-Normen. DIN 4768 Determination of surface roughness values of the parameters Ra, Rz, Rmax by means of electrical contact (stylus) instruments; terminology, measuring conditions.In: Deutsches Institut für Normung. DIN Taschenbuch 1 Mechanische Technik Grundnormen. 4th ed, Berlin, Wien, Zürich: Beuth Verlag; 1995:295-297. (In German).
24. Barbosa SH, Zanata RL, Navarro MF, Nunes OB. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins. Braz Dent J 2005; 16: 39-44.
25. Gedik R, Hurmuzlu F, Coskun A, Bektas OO, Ozdemir AK. Surface roughness of new microhybrid resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 1106-1112.
26. Maalhagh-Fard A, Wagner WC, Pink FE, Neme AM. Evaluation of surface finish and polish of eight provisional restorative materials using acylic bur and abrasive disk with and without pumice. Oper Dent 2003; 28:734-739.
27. Üctasli MB, Bala O, Güllü A. Surface roughness of flowable and packable composite resin materials after finishing with abrasive discs. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 1197-1202.
28. Turkun LS, Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004;29:203-211.