SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 51-52

Something rotten at the core of science?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RELIABILITY;

EID: 0035252553 PISSN: 01656147 EISSN: None Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01618-7 Document Type: Review

Times cited : (71)

References (7)

1
- 0006093769
- US Supreme Court
- (1993) Daubert vs Merrel Dow Pharmaceuticals Judgement , vol.92 , Issue.102 , pp. 509

2
- 4744354747
- How science works
- US Federal Judiciary Reference Manual on Evidence
- (2000) , pp. 66-72
- Goodstein, D.¹

3
- 0025015169
- The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation
- (1990) J. Am. Med. Assoc. , vol.263 , pp. 1438-1441
- Horrobin, D.F.¹

4
- 0030577216
- Peer review of grant applications: A harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?
- (1996) Lancet , vol.348 , pp. 1293-1295
- Horrobin, D.F.¹

5
- 0006051154
- Peer review: Is the good the enemy of the best?
- (1981) J. Res. Commun. Stud. , vol.3 , pp. 327-334
- Horrobin, D.F.¹

6
- 0033838913
- Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?
- (2000) Brain , vol.123 , pp. 1964-1969
- Rothwell, P.M.¹

7
- 0033941034
- Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry
- (2000) J. R. Soc. Med. , vol.93 , pp. 341-345
- Horrobin, D.F.¹

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.