Patterns of insertion and deletion in mammalian genomes

Current Genomics

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 370-378

  Fan, Yanhui ^a   Wang, Wenjuan ^a   Ma, Guoji ^a   Liang, Lijing ^a   Shi, Qi ^a   Tao, Shiheng ^a  

^a NORTHWEST A F UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Deletion; Gap; Indel; Insertion; Mammalian genome

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOTIDE;

GENE DELETION; GENE INSERTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HUMAN; MAMMAL; MAMMALIAN GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PSEUDOGENE; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VERTEBRATE;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 41549108890     PISSN: 13892029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138920207783406479     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Anzai, T., Shiina, T., Kimura, N., Yanagiya, K., Kohara, S., Shigenari, A., Yamagata, T., Kulski, J.K., Naruse, T.K., Fujimori, Y., Fukuzumi, Y., Yamazaki, M., Tashiro, H., Iwamoto, C., Umehara, Y., Imanishi, T., Meyer, A., Ikeo, K., Gojobori, T., Bahram, S., Inoko, H. Comparative sequencing of human and chimpanzee MHC class I regions unveils insertions/deletions as the major path to genomic divergence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100: 7708-7713.
2. Britten, R.J. Divergence between samples of chimpanzee and human DNA sequence is 5%, counting indels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99: 13633-13635.
3. Britten, R.J., Rowen, L., Williams, J., Cameron, R.A. Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100: 4661-4665.
4. Wetterbom, A., Sevov, M., Cavelier, L., Bergstrom, T.F. Comparative genomic analysis of human and chimpanzee indicates a key role for indels in primate evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 2006, 63: 682-690.
5. de Jong, W.W., Rydén, L. Cause of more frequent deletions than insertions in mutations and protein evolution. Nature 1981, 290: 157-159.
6. Graur, D., Shuali, Y., Li, W.H. Deletions in processed pseudogenes accumulate faster in rodents than in humans. J. Mol. Evol. 1989, 28: 279-285.
7. Gu, X., Li, W.H. The size distribution of insertions and deletions in human and rodent pseudogenes suggests the logarithmic gap penalty for sequence alignment. J. Mol. Evol. 1995, 40: 464-473.
8. Ophir, R., Graur, D. Patterns and rates of indel evolution in processed pseudogenes from humans and murids. Gene 1997, 205: 191-202.
9. Zhang, Z., Gerstein, M. Patterns of nucleotide substitution, insertion and deletion in the human genome inferred from pseudogenes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 5338-5348.
10. Saitou, N., Ueda, S. Evolutionary rates of insertion and deletion in noncoding nucleotide sequences of primates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1994, 11: 504-512.
11. Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 2002, 420: 520-562.
12. Rat Genome Sequencing Project Consortium. Genome sequence of the brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature 2004, 428: 493-521.
13. Taylor, M.S., Ponting, C.P., Copley, R.R. Occurrence and consequences of coding sequence insertions and deletions in mammalian genomes. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 555-566.
14. Benner, S.A., Cohen, M.A., Gonnet, G.H. Empirical and structural models for insertions and deletions in divergent evolution of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 229: 1065-1082.
15. Holm, L., Sander, C. Mapping the protein universe. Science 1996, 273: 595-603.
16. Qian, B., Goldstein, R.A. Distribution of indel lengths. Proteins 2001, 45: 102-104.
17. Conte, L.L., Ailey, B., Hubbard, T., Brenner, S.E., Murzin, A.G., Chothia, C. SCOP: a structural classification of protein database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 257-259.
18. Goonesekere, N.C.W., Lee, B. Frequency of gaps observed in a structurally aligned protein pair database suggests a simple gap penalty function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 2838-2843.
19. Karolchik, D., Baertsch, R., Diekhans, M., Furey, T.S., Hinrichs, A., Lu, Y.T., Roskin, K.M., Schwartz, M., Sugnet, C.W., Thomas, D.J., Weber, R.J., Haussler, D., Kent, W.J. The UCSC genome browser database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 51-54.
20. Schwartz, S., Kent, W.J., Smit, A., Zhang, Z., Baertsch, R., Hardison, R.C., Haussler, D., Miller, W. Human-mouse alignments with BLASTZ. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 103-107.
21. Kent, W.J., Baertsch, R., Hinrichs, A., Miller, W., Haussler, D. Evolution's cauldron: duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100: 11484-11489.
22. Blanchette, M., Kent, W.J., Riemer, C., Elnitski, L., Smit, A.F., Roskin, K.M., Baertsch, R., Rosenbloom, K., Clawson, H., Green, E.D., Haussler, D., Miller, W. Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset aligner. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 708-715.
23. Murphy, W.J., Eizirik, E., O'Brien, S.J., Madsen, O., Scally, M., Douady, C.J., Teeling, E., Ryder, O.A., Stanhope, M.J., de Jong, W.W., Springer, M.S. Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science 2001, 294: 2348-2351.
24. SPSS Inc. SPSS Base 15.0 User's Guide. SPSS Inc. Chicago IL. 2006.
25. Mo, J.Y., Maki, H., Sekiguchi, M. Mutational specificity of the dnaE173 mutator associated with a defect in the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase III of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 222: 925-936.
26. Golenberg, E.M., Clegg, M.T., Durbin, M.L., Doebley, J., Ma, D.P. Evolution of a noncoding region of the chloroplast genome. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1993, 2: 52-64.
27. Cartwright, R.A. Logarithmic gap costs decrease alignment accuracy. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7: 527.