Patterns of nucleotide substitution, insertion and deletion in the human genome inferred from pseudogenes

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 31, Issue 18, 2003, Pages 5338-5348

  Zhang, Zhaolei ^a   Gerstein, Mark ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA BASE; NUCLEOTIDE; RIBOSOME PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CPG ISLAND; DNA CONTENT; GENE DELETION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE FUNCTION; GENE INSERTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEIC ACID BASE SUBSTITUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOGENE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MICE; MUTAGENESIS, INSERTIONAL; MUTATION; POINT MUTATION; PSEUDOGENES; RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE DELETION;

INSERTION SEQUENCES;

EID: 0345306317     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg745     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Mighell, A.J., Smith, N.R., Robinson, P.A. and Markham, A.F. (2000) Vertebrate pseudogenes. FEBS Lett., 468, 109-114.
2. Esnault, C., Maestre, J. and Heidmann, T. (2000) Human line retrotransposons generate processed pseudogenes. Nature Genet., 24, 363-367.
3. Antonarakis, S.E., Krawczak, M. and Cooper, D.N. (2000) Disease-causing mutations in the human genome. Eur. J. Pediatr., 159, S173-S178.
4. Krawczak, M., Chuzhanova, N.A., Stenson, P.D., Johansen, B.N., Ball, E.V. and Cooper, D.N. (2000) Changes in primary DNA sequence complexity influence the phenotypic consequences of mutations in human gene regulatory regions. Hum. Genet., 107, 362-365.
5. Hess, S.T., Blake J.D. and Blake, R.D. (1994) Wide variations in neighbor-dependent substitution rates. J. Mol. Biol., 236, 1022-1033.
6. Gu, X. and Li, W.H. (1995) The size distribution of insertions and deletions in human and rodent pseudogenes suggests the logarithmic gap penalty for sequence alignment. J. Mol. Evol., 40, 464-473.
7. Ophir, R. and Graur, D. (1997) Patterns and rates of indel evolution in processed pseudogenes from humans and murids. Gene, 205, 191-202.
8. Petrov, D.A. and Hartl, D.L. (1999) Patterns of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila and mammalian genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 1475-1479.
9. Saitou, N. and Ueda, S. (1994) Evolutionary rates of insertion and deletion in noncoding nucleotide sequences of primates. Mol. Biol. Evol., 11, 504-512.
10. Zhang, Z., Harrison, P. and Gerstein, M. (2002) Identification and analysis of over 2000 ribosomal protein pseudogenes in the human genome. Genome Res., 12, 1466-1482.
11. Wool, I.G., Chan, Y.L. and Gluck, A. (1995) Structure and evolution of mammalian ribosomal proteins. Biochem. Cell Biol., 73, 933-947.
12. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J. (1994) Clustal W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4673-4680.
13. Pearson, W.R. (1997) Comparison of DNA sequences with protein sequences. Genomics, 46, 24-36.
14. Gojobori, T., Li, W.H. and Graur, D. (1982) Patterns of nucleotide substitution in pseudogenes and functional genes. J. Mol. Evol., 18, 360-369.
15. Li, W.H., Wu, C.I. and Luo, C.C. (1984) Nonrandomness of point mutation as reflected in nucleotide substitutions in pseudogenes and its evolutionary implications. J. Mol. Evol., 21, 58-71.
16. Lander, E.S., Linton, L.M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M.C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., Doyle, M., FitzHugh, W. et al. (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 409, 860-921.
17. Russell, G.J., Walker, P.M., Elton, R.A. and Subak-Sharpe, J.H. (1976) Doublet frequency analysis of fractionated vertebrate nuclear DNA. J. Mol. Biol., 108, 1-23.
18. Gentles, A.J. and Karlin, S. (2001) Genome-scale compositional comparisons in eukaryotes. Genome Res., 11, 540-546.
19. Bulmer, M. (1986) Neighboring base effects on substitution rates in pseudogenes. Mol. Biol. Evol., 3, 322-329.
20. Karlin, S. and Mrazek, J. (1997) Compositional differences within and between eukaryotic genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 10227-10232.
21. Duret, L. and Galtier, N. (2000) The covariation between tpa deficiency, cpg deficiency and g+c content of human isochores is due to a mathematical artifact. Mol. Biol. Evol., 17, 1620-1625.
22. Luscombe, N.M., Qian, J., Zhang, Z., Johnson, T. and Gerstein, M. (2002) The dominance of the population by a selected few: power-law behaviour applies to a wide variety of genomic properties. Genome Biol., 3, RESEARCH0040.
23. Waterston, R.H., Lindblad-Toh, K., Birney, E., Rogers, J., Abril, J.F., Agarwal, P., Agarwala, R., Ainscough, R., Alexandersson, M., An, P. et al. (2002) Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature, 420, 520-562.
24. Toth, G., Gaspari, Z. and Jurka, J. (2000) Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: survey and analysis. Genome Res., 10, 967-981.
25. Capy, P. (2000) Perspectives: evolution. Is bigger better in cricket? Science, 287, 985-986.
26. Levinson, G. and Gutman, G.A. (1987) Slipped-strand mispairing: A major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 203-221.
27. Pearson, C.E. and Sinden, R.R. (1998) Trinucleotide repeat DNA structures: Dynamic mutations from dynamic DNA. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 8, 321-330.