Naturalizing the essential tension

Synthese

Volumn 162, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 275-308

  D'Agostino, Fred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assembly bonus; Bounded rationality; Fuller; Hidden profile; Kuhn; Naturalizing; Risk spreading; Social comparison; Social epistemology

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549105715     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-007-9192-7     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bourdieu P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson J.(ed) Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education. New York, Greenwood Press
2. Collins B., Guetzkow H. (1964). A social psychology of group processes for decision-making. New York, Wiley
3. Connolly T., Koput K. (2002). Naturalistic decision making and the new organizational context. In: Shapira Z.(ed) Organizational decision making. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
4. Cramton C.D. (2002). Attribution in distributed work groups. In: Hinds P., Kiesler S.(eds) Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
5. D'Agostino F. (1990): The Aimless Rationality of Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4, 33-50
6. D'Agostino F. (1993): 'Demographic' Factors in Revolutionary Science: The Wave Model. Methodology and Science 26, 41-52
7. D'Agostino F. (2000): Incommensurability and Commensuration: Lessons from (and to) Ethico-Political Theory. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 31, 429-447
8. D'Agostino F. (2003): Incommensurability and Commensuration: The Common Denominator.
9. D'Agostino F. (2004): Pluralism and Liberalism. In: Gaus G.F., Kukathas C.(eds) Handbook of Political Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks
10. D'Agostino F. (2005a): Kuhn's Risk-Spreading Argument. Episteme 1, 201-209
11. D'Agostino F. (2005b): Rituals of Cosmopolitanism. Sites of Cosmopolitanism: Citizenship. Aesthetics, Culture
12. D'Agostino F. (2005c): The Sinews of a Free Society: Autonomy, Democracy and Education. In: Battin T.(ed) A Passion for Politics: Essays in Honour of Graham Maddox. Pearson Education Australia, Sydney, pp. 99-109
13. D'Agostino F. (2006): Two Conceptions of Rationality. Economy and Society 35, 1-21
14. De Dreu C., West M. (2001), Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 1191-1201
15. Forsyth D. (2000). Social comparison and influence in groups. In: Wheeler S.(ed) Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
16. Fuller S. (1988). Social epistemology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
17. Fuller S. (1994). Social psychology of scientific knowledge: Another strong programme. In: Shadish W., Fuller S.(eds) Social psychology of science. New York, The Guilford Press
18. Gellner E. (1989). Plough, sword and book. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
19. Goldman A. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford, Clarendon Press
20. Goodin R. (ed) (1996). The theory of institutional design. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
21. Grawitch M.J., Munz D.C. (2005). Individual and group affect in problem-solving workgroups. In Haertel C.E., Zerbe W.J., Ashkanasy N.M. (eds) Emotions in organizational behavior. Mahwah & London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
22. Hayek F.A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review 35, 519-530
23. Hinsz V., Tinsdale S., Vollrath D. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin 121, 43-64
24. Kerr N., MacCoun R., Kramer G. (1996). Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review 103, 687-719
25. Kiesler S., Cummings J.N. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In Hinds P., Kiesler S. (eds) Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
26. Kitcher P. (1990). The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy 87, 5-22
27. Kitcher P. (1993). The advancement of science. New York, Oxford University Press
28. Kitcher P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford, Oxford University Press
29. Kuhn, T. (1959 [1977]). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In T. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
30. Kuhn T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
31. Kusch M. (2002). Knowledge by agreement: The programme of communitarian epistemology. Oxford, Clarendon Press
32. Lakatos I. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Lakatos I., Musgrave A.(eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
33. Laudan R., Laudan L. (1989). Dominance and the disunity of method. Philosophy of Science 56, 221-233
34. Laughlin P.R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In: Fishbein M. (ed) Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
35. Longino H. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, Princeton University Press
36. Manin B., Przeworski A., Stokes S.C. (1999): Democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
37. Mannix E.A., Griffith T., Neale M.A. (2002). The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams. In: Hinds P., Kiesler S.(eds) Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
38. March J. (2002). Understanding how decisions happen in organizations. In: Shapira Z.(ed) Organizational decision making. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
39. March J., Olsen J.P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Universitetsforlaget, Bergen
40. Moreland R., Levine J. (1992). Problem identification in groups. In: Worchel S., Wood W., Simpson J.(eds) Group process and productivity. Newbury Park CA, Sage Publications
41. Moscovici S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In Berkowitz L.(ed) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13). New York, Academic Press
42. Nemeth C. (1992). Minority dissent as a stimulant to group performance. In: Worchel S., Wood W., Simpson J.(eds) Group process and productivity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
43. Nola R. (1989). Review of Harvey Siegel, Relativism Refuted. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40, 419-427
44. Payne J. (2002). The Scarecrow's search: A cognitive psychologist's perspective on organization decision making. In: Shapira Z.(ed) Organizational decision making. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
45. Polanyi M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
46. Popper K. (1972). The logic of scientific discovery. London, Hutchinson
47. Rosenwein R. (1994). Social influence in science: Agreement and dissent in achieving scientific consensus. In: Shadish W., Fuller S.(eds) The social psychology of science. New York, The Guilford Press
48. Scheidel T. (1996). Divergent and convergent thinking in group decision-making. In: Hirokawa R.Y.(ed) Communication and group decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers
49. Schmitt F.F. (1994). Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
50. Shadish W., Fuller S. (1994). The social psychology of science. New York, The Guilford Press
51. Shadish W., Fuller S., Gorman M. (1994). Social psychology of science: A conceptual and empirical research program. In: Shadish W., Fuller S.(eds) The social psychology of science. New York, The Guilford Press
52. Simon H.A. (1992). Economics, bounded rationality and the cognitive revolution. Aldershot, Edward Elgar
53. Smith A. (1893). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London, Routledge
54. Solomon M. (2001). Social empiricism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (Bradford Books)
55. Stasser G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. In: Worchel S., Wood W., Simpson J.(eds) Group process and productivity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
56. Stasser G., Birchmeier Z. (2003). Group creativity and collective choice. In: Paulus P.B., Nijstad B.A.(eds) Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford, Oxford University Press
57. Suls J.M. (2000). Opinion comparison. In: Suls J.M., Wheeler L.(eds) Handbook of social comparison. New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
58. Suls J.M., Wheeler L. (2000). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
59. Sunstein C.R. (2003). Why societies need dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
60. Teece D. (1998). Design issues for innovative firms: Bureaucracy, incentives and industrial structure. In: Chandler A., Hagstrom P., Solvell O.(eds) The dynamic firm: The role of technology, strategy, organization, and regions. Oxford, Oxford University Press
61. von Hippel E. (1998). "Sticky Information" and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. In: Chandler A., Hagstrom P., Solvell O.(eds) The dynamic firm: The role of technology, strategy, organization, and regions. Oxford, Oxford University Press
62. Watkins J.W.N. (1970). Against 'Normal Science'. In: Lakatos I., Musgrave A.(eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
63. Wenger E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.[12pt]