Kuhn's Risk-Spreading Argument and the Organization of Scientific Communities

Episteme

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 201-209

  D'agostino, Fred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010637623     PISSN: 17423600     EISSN: 17500117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/epi.2004.1.3.201     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barnes B (2001). “Practice as collective action”. In Schatzki T, Cetina K Knorr & von Savigny E (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
2. D'Agostino F (1993). ‘“Demographic” Factors in Revolutionary Science: The Wave Model’. Methodology and Science, vol. 26, pp. 41–52.
3. D'Agostino F (1996). Free Public Reason. New York: Oxford University Press
4. D'Agostino F (2000). “Incommensurability and Commensuration: Lessons from (and to) Ethico-Political Theory”. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 429–47.
5. D'Agostino F (2004). ‘Liberalism and Pluralism’, in Gaus G & Kukathas C (eds), Handbook of Political Theory. London: Sage.
6. Dworkin R (1986). Law's Empire. London: Fontana Press.
7. Goldman A (2004). “Group Knowledge versus Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology”. EPISTEME, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–22.
8. Hampshire S (1983). Morality and Conflict. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
9. Hayek FA (1973-1976). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
10. Hoyningen-Huene P (1993). Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
11. Kitcher P (1990). “The Division of Cognitive Labor”. Journal of Philosophy, vol. 87, pp. 5–22.
12. Kuhn T (1962). ‘The Structure of Scientific Revolutions’, in International Encyclopedia of Unified Science: Foundations of the Unity of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, vol. 2, no. 2.
13. Kuhn T (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Kuhn T (1977). The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Lakatos I (1970). “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in Lakatos I & Musgrave A (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Lakatos I & Musgrave A (eds.) (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Laudan R & Laudan L (1989). “Dominance and the Disunity of Method.” Philosophy of Science, vol. 56, pp. 221–33.
18. List C & Pettit P (2002). “Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result”. Economics and Philosophy, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 89–110.
19. Pylyshyn Z (ed.) (1987). The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
20. Rueger A (1996). “Risk and Diversification in Theory Choice”. Synthese, vol. 109, pp. 263–80.
21. Walstad A (2002). “Science as a Market Process”. Independent Review, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 5ff.
22. Wenger E (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.