Speculation on the neuropsychology of teleoperation: Implications for presence research and minimally invasive surgery

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 199-211

  Healey, Andrew N ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549103839     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/pres.17.2.199     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288-318.
2. Aguirre, G. K., Detre, J. A., Alsop, D. C., & D'Esposito, M. (1996). The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 823-829.
3. Aguirre, G. K., & D'Esposito, M. (1997). Environmental knowledge is subserved by separable dorsal/ventral neural areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2512-2518.
4. Arnold, P., & Farrell, M. J. (2003). Embodiment and spatial behavior in virtual environments: Comments on Durlach et al. (2000). Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12 (6), 658-662.
5. Bakker, N. H., Werkhoven, P. J., & Passenier, P. O. (1999). The effects of proprioreceptive and visual feedback on geographical orientation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(1), 36-53.
6. Baldwin, C. L. (2003). Neuroergonomics of mental workload: New insights from the convergence of brain and behaviour in ergonomics research. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomie Science, 4 (1-2), 132-141.
7. Bar, M., Tootell, R. B. H., Schacter, D. L., Greve, D. N., Fischl, B., Mendola, J. D., et al. (2001). Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition. Neuron 29, 529-535.
8. Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Posse, S., Seitz, R. J., Rizzolatti, G., & Freund, H.-J. (1999). A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: Evidence from an fMRI-study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 3276-3286.
9. Biocca, F., Kim, J., & Choi, Y. (2001). Visual touch in virtual environments: An exploratory study of presence, multimodal interfaces, and cross-modal sensory illusions. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10(3), 247-265.
10. Blake, R., Sobel, K. V., & James, T. W. (2004). Neural synergy between kinetic vision and touch. Psychological Science, 15(6), 397-402.
11. Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J., & O'Keefe, J. (2001). A temporoparietal and prefrontal network for retrieving the spatial context of lifelike events. Neurolmage, 14, 439-453.
12. Cao, C. G. L., & Milgram, P. (2000). Disorientation in minimal access surgery: A case study. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress.
13. Cho, D., Park, J., Kim, G. J., Hong, S., Han, S., & Lee, S. (2003). The dichotomy of presence elements: The where and what. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality. Available at http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/vr/ 2003/ 1882/00/18820273.pdf.
14. Cohen, Y. E., & Andersen, R. A. (2002). A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 553-562.
15. Culham, J. C., Cavina-Pratesi, C., & Singhal, A. (2006). The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: What have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia, 44, 2668 -2684.
16. Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 351, 1413-1420.
17. DeAngelis, G. C., Cumming, B. G, & Newsome, W. T. (1998). Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth. Nature, 394, 677-680.
18. Dion, Y. M., & Gaillard, F. (1997). Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy-Influence of 2-D and 3-D video-camera systems. Surgical Endoscopy, 77(10), 995-1000.
19. Dreary, I. J., Graham, K. S., Maran, A. G. (1992). Relationships between surgical ability ratings and spatial abilities and personality. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 37, 14 -79.
20. Durlach, N., Allen, G., Darken, R., Garnett, R. L., Loomis, J., Templeman, J., et al. (2000). Virtual environments and the enhancement of spatial behavior: Toward a comprehensive research agenda. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(6), 593-615.
21. Emam, T. A., Hanna, G., & Cuschieri, A. (2002). Comparison of orthodox versus off-optical axis endoscopic manipulations: Importance of monitor display angles. Surgical Endoscopy, 16, 401-405.
22. Epstein, R., Harris, A., Stanley, D., & Kanwisher, N. (1999). The parahippocampal place area: Recognition or encoding? Neuron, 23, 115-125.
23. Ferrel, C., Orliaguet, J. P., Leifflen, D., Bard, C., & Fleury, M. (2001). Visual context and the control of movements through video display. Human Factors, 43(1), 56-65.
24. Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). How direct is visual perception? Some reflections on Gibson's "Ecological Approach." Cognition, 9, 139-196.
25. Francis, N. J., Hanna, G. B., Cresswell, A. B., Carter, F. J., & Cuschieri, A. (2001). The performance of master surgeons on standard aptitude testing. The American Journal of Surgery, 182, 30-33.
26. Fleishman, E. A. (1972). On the relation between abilities, learning and human performance. American Psychologist, 27, 1017-1032.
27. Frith, C., & Dolan, R. (1996). The role of the prefrontal cortex in higher cognitive functions. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 175-181.
28. Ghilardi, M.-F., Ghez, C., Dhawan, V., Moeller, J., Mentis, M., Nakamura, T., et al. (2000). Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning. Brain Research, 871, 127-145.
29. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
30. Gordon, H. W. (1986). The Cognitive Laterality Battery: Tests of specialised cognitive function. International Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 79-92.
31. Grill-Spector, K., Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research, 41, 1409-1422.
32. Hall, J. C. (2002). Imagery practice and the development of surgical, skills. The American Journal of Surgery, 465-470.
33. Hitchcock, E. M., Warm, J. S., Matthews, G., Dember, W. N., Shear, P. K., Tripp, L. D., et al. (2003). Automation cueing modulates cerebral blood flow and vigilance in a simulated air traffic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomie Science, 4 (1-2), 89-112.
34. Howard, I. P., & Templeton, W. B. (1966). Human spatial orientation. New York: Wiley.
35. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Price, C. J. (1997). Top-down processes in object identification: Evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology and functional anatomy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 352, 1275-1282.
36. IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2003). Presence in the past: What can we learn from media history. In G. Riva, F. Davide, & W. A. IJsselsteijn (Eds.), Being there: Concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
37. IJsselsteijn, W. A., Lombard, M., & Freeman, J. (2001). Toward a core bibliography of presence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 317-321.
38. James, T. W., James, K. H., Humphrey, G. K., & Goodale, M. A. (2005). Do visual and tactile object representations share the same neural substrate? In M. A. Heller & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Touch and blindness: Psychology and neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Johnsrude, I. S., Owen, A. M., Crane, J., Milner, B., &. Evans, A. C. (1999). A cognitive activation study of memory for spatial relationships. Neuropsychologia, 37, 829-841.
40. Johnston, W. K., Low, R. K., & Das, S. (2003). Image converter eliminates mirror imaging during laparoscopy. Journal of Endourology, 17(5), 327-331.
41. Karni, A. (1996). The acquisition of perceptual and motor skills : A memory system in the adult human cortex. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 39-48.
42. Kawasaki, H., Adolphs, R., Kaufman, O., Damasio, H., Damasio, A., Granner, M., et al. (2001). Single-neuron responses to emotional visual stimuli recorded in human ventral, prefrontal cortex. Nature, 4(1), 15-16.
43. Kimura, T., Umehara, Y., & Matsumoto, S. (2000). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon using a visual field, tracking camera. Surgical Endoscopy, 14, 825-829.
44. Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 635-642.
45. Krakauer, J. W., Ghilardi, M. F., Mentis, M., Barnes, A., Veytsman, M., Eidelberg, D., et al. (2004). Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: A PET study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(2), 924-933.
46. Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement and depth: Anatomy, physiology and perception. Science, 240, 743-749.
47. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2).
48. Maguire, E. A., Burgess, N., Donnett, J. G., Frackowiack, R. S., Frith, C. D., & O'Keefe, J. (1998). Knowing where and getting there: A human navigation network. Science, 280, 921-924.
49. Malouin, F., Richards, C. L., Jackson, P. L., Dumas, F., & Doyon, J. (2003). Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor-related tasks: A PET study. Human Brain Mapping, 19, 47-62.
50. Mantovani, F., & Castelnuovo, G. (2003). Sense of presence in virtual training. In G. Riva, F. Davide & W. A. IJsselsteijn (Eds.), Being there: Concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
51. Mesulam, M.-M. (1998). From sensation to cognition. Brain, 121, 1013-1052.
52. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1.995). The visual brain in action. New York: OUP.
53. Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 415-417.
54. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
55. Owen, A. M., Milner, B., Petrides, M., & Evans, A. C. (1996). Memory for object features versus memory for object location: A positron-emission tomography study of encoding and retrieval processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 93, 9212-9217.
56. Palmer, S. E., & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organisation: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29-55.
57. Parasuraman, R. (2003). Neuroergonomics: Research and practice. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 4(1-2), 5-20.
58. Pennel, I., Ferrei, C., Coello, Y., & Orliaguet, J. P. (2002). Sensorimotor control in teleoperation: Theoretical and ergonomie considerations. Travail Humain 65(1), 29-58.
59. Pylyshyn, Z. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioural and Brain Science, 157-238.
60. Radermercher, K., Pichler, C., Fischer, S., & Rau, G. (1998). 3D-Visualisation in surgery. Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering. Aachen (D), 1-6.
61. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H., Annett, J. M., & Gifford, M. (1999). Depth perception and indirect viewing: Reflections on minimally invasive surgery. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3(2) 77-90.
62. Risucci, D. (2002). Visual spatial perception and surgical competence. The American Journal of Surgery, 184, 291-295.
63. Risucci, D., Geiss, A., Gellman, L., Pinard, B., & Rosser, J. C. (2000). Experience and visual perception in resident acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Current Surgery, 57(4), 368-372.
64. Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (2000). Perceived self in infancy. Infant Behavior & Development, 23, 513-530.
65. Rock, I. (1997). Indirect perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Sakai, K., Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., Takino, R., Sasaki, Y., &. Putz, B. (1998). Transition of brain activity from frontal to parietal areas in visuomotor sequence learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18(5), 1827-1840.
67. Sarter, N., & Sarter, M. (2003). Neuroergonomics: Opportunities and challenges of merging cognitive neuroscience with cognitive ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 4(1-2), 142-150.
68. Scheuneman, A. L., Pickleman, J., Hesslein, R., & Freeark, R. J. (1984). Neuropsychological predictors of operative skill among general surgery residents. Surgery, 96, 288-295.
69. Shallice, T., Burgess, P. (1996). The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 351, 1405-1412.
70. Shelton, A. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2002). Neural correlates of encoding space from route and survey perspectives. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(7), 2711-2717.
71. Smith, M. L., & Milner, B. (1981). The role of the right hippocampus in the recall of spatial location. Neuropsychologia, 19, 781-793.
72. Tendick, F., Jennings, R., Tharp, G., & Stark, L. (1993). Sensing and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery: Experiment, analysis and observation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2(1), 66-81.
73. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield. (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process? Perception & Psychophysics, 59(8), 1280-1296.
75. Wanzel, K., Hamstra, S., Anastakis, D., Matsumoto, E., & Cusimano, M. (2002). Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical, skills. The Lancet, 359(19), 230-231.
76. Waterworth, E. L., & Waterworth, J. A. (2001). Focus, locus and. sensus: The three dimensions of virtual experience. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, (2), 203-213.
77. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von Gestalt, II. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301-350. In W. D. Ellis (1955), A source book of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
78. Witmer, B. G., Bailey, J. H., & Knerr, B. W. (1996). Virtual, spaces and real world places: Transfer of route knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 413-428.
79. Zahoric, M. C., & Jenison, R. L. (1998). Presence as beingin-the-world. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(1), 78-89.