Ecological interface design for terrain awareness

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 375-400

  Borst, C ^a,b   Suijkerbuijk, H C H ^a   Mulder, M ^a   Van Paassen, M M ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750863933     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap1604_3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amelink, M. H. J. (2002). Visual control augmentation by presenting energy management information in the primary flight display - An ecological approach. Unpublished master's thesis, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands. Retrieved November 12, 2005, from http://www.amelink.net/mscthesis
2. Amelink, M. H. J., Mulder, M., Van Paassen, M. M., & Flach, J. M. (2005). Theoretical foundations for a total energy-based perspective flight-path display. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 15, 205-231.
3. Angers, S. (2001). Technology flies high on Boeing 737. Retrieved December 8, 2005, from http://www.boeing.com/commercial/737family
4. Bisantz, A. M., & Vicente, K. J. (1994). Making the abstraction hierarchy concrete. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 83-117.
5. Dinadis, N., & Vicente, K. J. (1999). Designing functional visualizations for aircraft system status displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 241-269.
6. Endsley, D. M. R., & Garland, D. J. (2000). Situation awareness analysis and measurement: SA technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Glaab, L. J., Kramer, L. J., Arthur, J. J., Parrish, R. V., & Barry, J. S. (2003). Flight test comparison of synthetic vision display concepts at Dallas/Fort-Worth Airport (NASA Tech. Memo. No. TM-2003-212177). Langley, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.
8. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA.en TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research, human mental workload. New York: Elsevier.
9. Parker, I. (2000, June). Avionics for a colossus [Electronic version]. Avionics Magazine. Retrieved September 25, 2005, from http://www.aviationtoday. com
10. Prevot, T., & Palmer, E. (2000). Staying ahead of the automation: A vertical situation display can help. In Proceedings of the AIAA 2000 World Aviation Conference (pp. 1-9). Reston, VA: AIAA.
11. Prinzel, L. J., III, Comstock, J. R., Jr., Glaab, L. J., Kramer, L. J., Arthur, J. J., & Barry, J. S. (2004). The efficacy of head-down and head-up synthetic vision display concepts for retro- and forward-fit of commercial aircraft. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 53-77.
12. Pritchett, A. R. (2001). Reviewing the role of cockpit alerting systems. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, 5-38.
13. Pritchett, A. R., Vándor, B., & Edwards, K. (2002). Testing and implementing cockpit alerting systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 75, 193-206.
14. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge; Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13, 257-266.
15. Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human machine interaction. New York: North-Holland.
16. Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley.
17. Ruijgrok, G. J. J. (1996). Elements of airplane performance. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press.
18. Schiefele, J., Howland, D., Maris, J., & Wipplinger, P. (2003). Human factors flight trial analysis for 2D situation awareness and 3D synthetic vision displays. In Proceedings of the 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 9.C.1-9.C.14).
19. Suijkerbuijk, H. C. H., Borst, C., Mulder, M., & Van Paassen, M. M. (2005). Development and experimental evaluation of a performance-based vertical situation display. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance., Navigation and Control Conference (pp. 1-23). Reston, VA: AIAA.
20. Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992). Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 589-606.
22. Wickens, C. D., Fadden, S., Mervin, D., & Ververs, P. (1998). Cognitive factors in aviation display design. In Proceedings of the 17th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (Vol. 1, pp. E32/1-E32/8).
23. Williams, D., Waller, M., Koeling, J., Burdette, D., Doyle, T., Capron, W., et al. (2001). Concept of operations: for commercial and business aircraft synthetic vision systems (NASA Tech. Memo. No. TM-2001-211058). Langley, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.