Application of innovative time series methodology to relationship between retroreflectivity of pavement markings and crashes

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2019, 2007, Pages 119-126

  Masliah, Maurice ^a   Bahar, Geni ^a   Hauer, Ezra ^b  

^a iTRANS Consulting Ltd   (United States)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRASHWORTHINESS; INNOVATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PAVEMENTS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

PAVEMENT MARKINGS; RETROREFLECTIVITY;

TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 41549091980     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2019-15     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. NCHRP Web-Only Document 92: Pavement Marking Materials and Markers: Real-World Relationship Between Retroreflectivity and Safety Over Time. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_webdoc_92.pdf.
2. Lee, J., T. Maleck, and W. Taylor. Pavement Marking Material Evaluation Study in Michigan. ITE Journal, July 1999.
3. Abboud, N. K., and B. L. Bowman. Establishing a Crash-Based Retroreflectivity Threshold. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
4. Migletz, J., L. J. Graham, D. W. Harwood, M. K. Bauer, and P. L. Sterner. Evaluation of All-Weather Pavement Markings. Report FHWA C1038/ 3524-04. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.
5. Cottrell, B. H., and R. A. Hanson. Determining the Effectiveness of Pavement Marking Materials Final Report. VTRC 01-R9. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2001.
6. Hauer, E., D. Terry, and M. S. Griffith. Effect of Resurfacing on Safety of Two-Lane Rural Roads in New York State. In Transportation Research Record 1467, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 30-37.
7. Zwahlen, H. T., and T. Schnell. Visibility of New Centerline and Edge Line Pavement Markings. In Transportation Research Record 1605, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 49-61.
8. Graham, J. R., J. K. Harrold, and L. E. King. Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity Requirements for Older Drivers. In Transportation Research Record 1529, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 65-70, pp. 49-61.
9. Loetterle, F. E., R. A. Beck, and J. Carlson. Public Perception of Pavement-Marking Brightness. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1715, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 51-59.
10. Parker, N. A., and M. S. J. Meja. Evaluation of Performance of Permanent Pavement Markings. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1824, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 123-132.
11. Zwahlen, H. T., and T. Schnell. Minimum In-Service Retroreflectivity of Pavement Markings. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1715, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 60-70.
12. The South Yorkshire Test of the Use of Edgelines in Reducing Accidents. Road Marking Industry Group, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, 1977.
13. Potters Industries Inc. Tests of Stripping Effectiveness on Two-Lane Rural Roads. Potters Industries, Inc., Carlstadt, N.J., 1972.
14. Potters Industries, Inc. Pavement Edge Markings Reduce Accident Rates. Michigan Highway Department, Lansing, 1982, pp. 31-33.
15. Johnston, I. R. The Effects of Roadway Delineation on Curve Negotiation by Both Sober and Drinking Drivers. Research Report 128. Australian Road Research Board, Vermont South, Victoria, 1983.
16. Glennon, J. C. Accident Effects of Centerline Markings on Low-Volume Rural Roads. In Transportation Research Record 1027, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 7-13.
17. Charnock, D. B., and C. A. B. Chessell. Carriageway Edgelining and the Effect on Road Safety: Report of a Two Year Study in East Sussex. Presented at 8th International Road Federation World Meeting, Tokyo, 1977.
18. Bahar, G., C. Mollett, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, A. Smiley, T. Smahel, and H. McGee. NCHRP Report 518: Safety Evaluation of Permanent Raised Pavement Markers. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.
19. Kugle, C. L., O. J. Pendleton, and M. S. Von Tress. An Evaluation of the Accident Reduction Effectiveness of Raised Pavement Markers. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1984, pp. 1-27.
20. Raised Reflectorized Snowplowable Pavement Markers: A Report to the Governor. New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, 1997, pp. 1-88.
21. Safety and Congestion Management Research and Advanced Technology Applications - Final Report (Technical Assistance to the RPM Task Force). Research Work Order Number 1. Orth-Rodgers Associates Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., 1998, pp. 1-20.
22. Mak, K. K., T. Chira-Chavala, and L. I. Griffin. Evaluation of the Safety Effects of Raised Pavement Markers. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1987.
23. Minimum Maintained Retroreflectivity Guideline Status. FHWA and Safety and Design, U.S. Department of Transportation, Dec. 12, 2002, pp. B-1-B-7.
24. Rice, J. A. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove, Calif., 1988.