Accountability, rigor, and detracking: Achievement effects of embracing a challenging curriculum as a universal good for all students

Teachers College Record

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 571-607

  Burris, Carol Corbett ^a   Wiley, Ed ^b   Welner, Kevin ^b   Murphy, John ^a  

^a Rockville Centre Union Free School District   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41449113134     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns and bachelor's degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research. Retrieved from http://www.ed. gov/pubs/Toolbox.
2. AERA. (2004, Fall). Closing the gap: High achievement for students of color. Research Points, 2(3). Available online at http://www.aera.net/ uploadedFiles/Journals and Publications/Research_Points/RPFall-04.pdf
3. Berger, J. (2000). Does top-down, standards-based reform work? A review of the status of statewide, standards-based reform. NASSP Bulletin, 84, 57-65.
4. Berliner, D.C. (2005). Our impoverished view of educational reform. Teachers College Record, Date Published: August 02, 2005. http://www.tcrecord.org; ID Number: 12106; Date Accessed: 8/24/2005.
5. Black, S. (1992). On the wrong track. Executive Educator, 14(12), 46-49.
6. Bloom, H.S., Ham, S., Melton, L., & O'Brient, J. (2001). Evaluating the accelerated schools approach: A look at early implementation and impacts on student achievement in eight elementary schools. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
7. Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Braddock, J.H., II, & Dawkins, M.P. (1993). Ability grouping, aspirations, and attainment: Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988. Journal of Negro Education, 62, 324-336.
9. Burris, C.C., & Welner, K. G. (2005). Closing the achievement gap by detracking. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(8), 594-598.
10. Brewer, D.J., Rees, D.I., & Argys, L.M. (1995). Detracking America's schools: The reform without cost? Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 210-212, 214-215.
11. Brewer, D.J., Rees, D.I., & Argys, L.M. (1996). The reform without costs? A reply to our critics. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 442-443.
12. Burris, C.C., Heubert, J., & Levin, H. (2006). Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping. American Educational Research Journal,43(1), 103-134.
13. Cabrera, A.F., & Bernal, E.M. (1998). Association between SES and ethnicity across three national databases. University Park, PA: Center for the Study of Higher Education.
14. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (1998). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A review of the evidence. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15. Conkin, K.D., & Curran, B.A. (2005). National education summit on high schools: An action agenda for improving America's high schools. Washington, DC: Achieve Inc.
16. Conley, D.T. (2005). College knowledge: What it really takes for students to succeed and what we can do to get them ready. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Darling-Hammond, L. (2003). Standards and assessments: Where we are and what we need. Teachers College Record. Retrieved March 5, 2003 from http://www.tcrecord.org (ID Number: 11109).
19. Dillon, W.R., & Goldstein, M. (1984). Multivariate analysis, methods and Applications. New York: Wiley.
20. Duevel, L. M. (2000). The International Baccalaureate experience: University perseverance, attainment, and perspectives on the process. Dissertation Abstracts International-A 60/11, p. 3852.
21. Epple, D., Newlon, E., & Romano, R. (2002). Ability tracking, school competition, and the distribution of educational benefits. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 1-48.
22. Epstein, J. L., & Maclver, D.J. (1992). Opportunities to learn: Effects on eighth graders of curriculum offerings and instructional approaches (Report No. 34). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
23. Figlio, D.N., & Page, M. E. (2002). School choice and the distributional effects of ability tracking: Does separation increase inequality? Journal of Urban Economics, 51(3), 497-514.
24. Frey, M.C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g?: The relationship between the Scholastic Assessment Test and general cognitive ability. Psychological science. 15(6), 373-378.
25. Gamoran, A. (1986). Instructional and institutional effects of ability grouping. Sociology of Education, 59, 185-198.
26. Gamoran, A. (1992). Synthesis of research: Is ability grouping equitable? Educational Leadership, 50(2), 11-17.
27. Gamoran, A., & Hannigan, E.C. (2000). Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 94(3), 241-254.
28. Gamoran, A., & Mare, R.D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement or neutrality? American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1146-1183.
29. Gamoran, A., & Weinstein, M. (1998). Differentiation and opportunity in restructured schools. American Journal of Education, 106, (3), 385-415.
30. Garet, M.S., & Delany, B. (1988). Students, courses, and stratification. Sociology of Education, 61, 61-77.
31. George, P. (1992). How to untrack your school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
32. Goff, G.N. (1995). Assessing the impact of tracking on individual growth in mathematics achievement using random coefficient modeling. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(03), 855. (University Microfilms No. 9523572).
33. Goycochea, B.B. (2000). College prep mathematics in secondary schools: Access denied. Dissertations Abstracts International, 61(4), p. 1333.
34. Hallinan, M.T (1992). The organization of students for instruction in the middle school. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 114-127.
35. Hallinan, M.T. (1994). Tracking from theory to practice. Exchange. Sociology of Education, 57(2), 79-84.
36. Hallinan, M.T., & Sorensen, A.B. (1987). Ability grouping and sex differences in mathematics achievement. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 63-72.
37. Haycock, K. (2000). Honor in the boxcar: Equalizing teacher quality. In P. Barth (Ed.), Teaching K-12 4(1). Washington, DC: Education Trust.
38. Heubert, J.P., & Hauser, R.M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
39. International Baccalaureate Organization. (2005). Education for life. Retrieved March 26, 2005 from: http://www.ibo.org/ibo/index.cfm.
40. Kerckhoff, A.C. (1986). Effects of ability grouping in British secondary schools. American Sociological Review, 51(6), 842-58.
41. Kliebard, H.M. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958 (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
42. Kulik,J.A. (1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Storrs, CT: National Center of the Gifted and Talented.
43. Levin, H.M. (1997). Raising school productivity: An x-efficiency approach. Economics of Education Review, 16(3), pp. 303-12.
44. Lipman, P. (1998). Race, class and power in school restructuring. New York: SUNY Press.
45. Loveless, T. (1998). The tracking and ability grouping debate. Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, 2(8). Retrieved July, 1999 from http://www. edexcellence.net/library/track.html.
46. Loveless, T. (1999a). Will tracking reform promote social equity? Phi Delta Kappan, 56(7), 26-32.
47. Loveless, T. (1999b). The Tracking Wars: State Reform Meets School Policy. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
48. Lucas, S.R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
49. Lucas, S.R., & Gamoran, A. (1993). Race and track assignment: A reconsideration with course-based indicators of track location. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
50. Mehan, H., Villanueva, I., Hubbard, L., & Lintz, A. (1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of untracking low-achieving students. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Mills, R.P. (2004). New York: The state of learning: A report to the governor and the legislature on the educational status of the state's schools. Albany: New York State Education Department. Retrieved December 2005 from http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/irts/655report/2004/Volume 1/combined_report.pdf
52. Mosteller, F., Light, R.J., & Sachs, J.A. (1996). Sustained inquiry in education: Lessons from skill grouping and class size. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 797-843.
53. Natriello, G., & Pallas, A.M. (1999). The development and impact of high stakes testing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 443 871).
54. New York State Board of Regents. (2003). What is a similar school? Albany: New York State Education Department. Retrieved December 2005 from http://emsc33.nysed.gov/repcrd2003/information/similar-schools/guide.html
55. Oakes, J. (1982). The reproduction of inequity: The content of secondary school tracking. Urban Review, 14(2), 107-120.
56. Oakes, J. (1986). Keeping track, Part 1: The policy and practice of curriculum inequality. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 12-18.
57. Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. (2nd edition). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. (1992). Curriculum differentiation, opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In P.W.Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570-607). New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
60. Oakes, J., Ormseth, T., Bell, R., & Camp, P. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
61. Peter D. Hart Research Associates. (2005). Rising to the challenge: Are high school students prepared to work? Washington, DC: Author/Public Opinion Strategies. Available online at http://www.achieve.org/achieve.nsf/ StandardForm3?openform&parentunid=ABC3A652CD3B736785256F9E00783B86.
62. Peterson, J.M. (1989). Remediation is no remedy. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 2425.
63. Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. New York: Simon & Schuster.
64. Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
65. Singham, M. (2003). The achievement gap: Myths and reality. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(8), 586-591.
66. Slavin, R.E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-499.
67. Slavin, R.E., & Braddock, J.H., IH. (1993). Ability grouping: On the wrong track. College Board Review, 168, 11-17.
68. Sandholtz, J.H., Ogawa, R.T., & Scribner, S.P. (2004). Standards gaps: Unintended consequences of local standards. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1177-1202.
69. Sirotnik, K., & Oakes, J. (1986). Critical inquiry for school renewal: Liberating theory and practice. In K. A. Sirotnik & J. Oakes (Eds.), Critical perspectives on the organization and improvement of schooling (pp. 3-94). Hingham, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
70. Thompson, S. (2001). The authentic standards movement and its evil twin. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 358-62.
71. Useem, E.L. (1992). Getting on the fast track in mathematics: School organizational influences on math track assignment. American Journal of Education, 100, 325-353.
72. Vanfossen, B.E., Jones, J. D., & Spade, J.Z. (1987). Curriculum tracking and status maintenance. Sociology of Education, 60, 104-122.
73. Wells, A.S., & Oakes, J. (1996). Potential pitfalls of systemic reform: Early lessons from research on detracking. Sociology of Education, 69, 135-143.
74. Wells, A.S., & Serna, I. (1996). The politics of culture: Understanding local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 93-118.
75. Welner, K.G. (2001a). Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity. Albany: SUNY Press.
76. Welner, K.G. (2001b). Tracking in an era of standards: Low-expectation classes meet high-expectation laws. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 28(3), 699-738.
77. Wheelock, A. (1992). Crossing the tracks: How "untracking" can save America's schools. New York: New Press.
78. White, P., Gamoran, A., Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. (1996). Upgrading the high school math curriculum: Math course-taking patterns in seven high schools in California and New York. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 285-307.