The craft of urologic surgery: Modern radical perineal prostatectomy

Urologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 629-641

  Holzbeierlein, Jeffrey M ^a   Porter II, H J ^a   Thrasher, J Brantley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

ENGL

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTINENCE; HUMAN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; PROSTATECTOMY; RECTUM INJURY; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; LIGAMENTS; MALE; PROSTATECTOMY; SEMINAL VESICLES; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 4143115581     PISSN: 00940143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2004.04.021     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Walsh P.C., Lepor H., Eggleston J.D. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate. 4:1983;473
2. Weyrauch H.M. Surgery of the prostate. 1959;WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia. p. 172-230
3. Gouley J.W.S. Some points in the surgery of the hypertrophied prostate. Trans Meet Am Surg Assoc Am Surg Assoc. 3:1885;163-192
4. Billroth T. Carcinoma der prostata. Chir Erfahrungen, Zurich, 1860-67. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir 1869;Bd X,S:548.
5. Young H.H. A surgeon's autobiography. 1940;Harcourt, Brace and Co, New York. p. 104-134
6. Young H.H. The cure of cancer of the prostate by radical perineal prostatectomy (prostate-seminal vesiculectomy): history, literature and statistics of Young's operation. J Urol. 53:1945;188-256
7. Gibson T.E. Improvements in perineal prostatectomy. Surg Gynec and Obstet. 47:1928;531-539
8. Belt E. Radical perineal prostatectomy in early carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol. 48:1942;287-297
9. Millin T. The surgery of the malignant prostate. Br J Urol. 30:1958;407-410
10. Campbell E.W. Total prostatectomy with preliminary ligation of the vascular pedicles. J Urol. 81:1959;464-467
11. Soutar H.S. Complete removal of the prostate. BMJ. 1:1947;917-918
12. Memmelaar J. Total prostatovesiculectomy-retropubic approach. J Urol. 62:1949;340-348
13. Reiner W.B., Walsh P.C. An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini's plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy: the apical dissection. J Urol. 138:(3):1987;543-550
14. Weldon V.E., Tavel F.R. Potency sparing radical perineal prostatectomy: anatomy, surgical technique, and initial results. J Urol. 140:1988;559-562
15. Partin A.W., Kattan M.V., Subong E., Walsh P.C., Wojno K.J., Oesterling J.E., et al. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA. 277:1997;1445-1451
16. Paulsen D.F. Impact of radical prostatectomy in the management of clinically localized disease. J Urol. 152:1994;1826-1830
17. Saito S., Murakami G. Radical perineal prostatectomy: a novel approach for lymphadenectomy from perineal incision. J Urol. 170:2003;1298-1300
18. Ung J.O., Richie J.P., Chen M.H., Renshaw A.A., D'Amico A.V. Evolution of the presentation and pathologic and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed during the PSA era. Urology. 60:(3):2002;458-463
19. Bluestein D.L., Bostwick D.G., Bergstrahl E.J., Oesterling J.E. Eliminating the need for bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in select patients with prostate cancer. J Urol. 151:(5):1994;1315-1320
20. Nichols R.L., Condon R.E. Preoperative preparation of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 132:1971;323-337
21. Hudson P.B. Symposium on the prostate. Perineal prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2:1975;69-83
22. Lance R.S., Freidrichs P.A., Kane C., Powell C.R., Pulos E., Moul J.W., et al. A comparison of radical retropubic with perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer within the Uniformed Services Urology Research Group. BJU Int. 87:(1):2001;61-65
23. Lassen P.M., Kearse W.S. Jr. Rectal injuries during radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology. 45:1995;266-279
24. Bishoff J.T., Motley G., Optenberg S.A., Stein C.R., Moon K.A., Browning S.M., et al. Incidence of fecal and urinary incontinence following radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy in a national population. J Urol. 160:(2):1998;454-458
25. Dahm P., Silverstein A., Young M.D., et al. A longitudinal assessment of bowel related symptoms and fecal incontinence following radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol. 169:2003;2220-2224
26. Price D.T., Vieweg J., Roland F., Coetzee L., Spalding T., Iselin C., et al. Transient lower extremity neuropraxia associated with radical perineal prostatectomy: a complication of the exaggerated lithotomy position. J Urol. 160:(4):1998;1376-1378
27. Weizer A.Z., Silverstein A.D., Young M.D., et al. Prospective evaluation of pain medication requirement and recovery after radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology. 62:2003;693-697
28. Boxer R.T., Kaufman J.J., Goodwin W.E. Radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: 1971-1976; a review of 329 patients. J Urol. 117:1977;208-213
29. Frazier H.A., Robertson J.E., Paulsen D.F. Radical prostatectomy: the pros and cons of the perineal versus the retropubic approach. J Urol. 147:1992;888-890
30. Haab F., Boccon-Gibbod L., Delmas V., Boccon-Gibod L., Toublanc M. Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer. Br J Urol. 74:(5):1994;626-629
31. Boccon-Gibod L., Ravery V., Vordos D., Toublanc M., Delmas V., Boccon-Gibod L. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions. J Urol. 160:(4):1998;1383-1385
32. Salomon L., Anastasiadis A.G., Levrel O., et al. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer. Urology. 61:2003;386-390
33. Moul J.W., Sun L., Wu H., et al. Factors associated with blood loss during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era: an overview of the Department of Defense (DOD) Center for Prostate Disease Research (CPDR) national database. Urol Oncol. 21:2003;447-455
34. Tewari A., Srivasatava A., Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 92:(3):2003;205-210
35. Young M.D., Weizer A.Z., Silverstein A.D., et al. Urinary continence and quality of life in the first year after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol. 170:2003;2374-2378
36. Litwin M.S., Melmed G.Y., Nakazon T. Life after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal study. J Urol. 167:2001;587
37. Gray M., Petroni G.R., Theodorescu D. Urinary function after radical prostatectomy: a comparison of the retropubic and perineal approaches. Urology. 53:1999;881-890
38. Salomon L., Levrel O., Anastasiadis A.G., et al. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA < 10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic aproach. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 5:2002;285-290
39. Arai Y., Egawa S., Terachi T., et al. Morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a summary of early multi-institutional experience in Japan. Int J Urol. 10:2003;430-434
40. Mokulis J., Thompson I. Radical prostatectomy: is the perineal approach more difficult to learn? J Urol. 157:(1):1997;230-232
41. Hon M., Nadler R.B., Catalona W.J., Thrasher J.B., Tewari A., Menon M. Radical prostatectomy: should the retropubic approach remain the standard of care? Contemp Urology. 16:2004;38-58