A comparison of radical retropubic with perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer within the Uniformed Services Urology Research Group

BJU International

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 61-65

  Lance, R S ^a   Freidrichs, P A ^b   Kane, C ^c   Powell, C R ^c   Pulos, E ^a   Moul, J W ^d   Mcleod, D G ^c   Cornum, R L ^b   Thrasher, J Brantley ^a  

^a MADIGAN ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WILFORD HALL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^d WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Outcome; Perineal; Prostatectomy; Retropubic

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERINEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE DISEASE; PROSTATECTOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0035148952     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00023.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: Insight into etiology and prevention
2. Blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: Is preoperative autologous blood donation indicated?
3. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of autologous blood predeposit in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy procedures
4. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathologic stage of localized prostate cancer: A multi-institutional update
5. Carcinoma der Prosimia. Chir Erfahrungen. Zurich. 1860-1867
6. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate: Being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases
7. Potency-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy: Anatomy, surgical technique and initial results
8. Is there really a difference between the perineal and retropubic prostatectomy?
9. Radical prostatectomy: The pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach
10. Perineal versus retropubic approach for T1,T2 prostate cancer
11. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: The perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions
12. Total prostatectomy for localized prostatic cancer
13. Impact of radical prostatectomy in the management of clinically localized disease
14. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: Results at 10 years
15. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: Importance of the apical dissection