Calculating potentials of mean force from steered molecular dynamics simulations

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 120, Issue 13, 2004, Pages 5946-5961

  Park, Sanghyun ^a   Schulten, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIMOLECULAR SYSTEMS; STEERED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS (SMD);

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; DIFFUSION; FUNCTIONS; MOLECULAR PHYSICS; RELAXATION PROCESSES; THERMODYNAMICS;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFORMATION; ENERGY TRANSFER; MATHEMATICS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY TRANSFER; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 4143087050     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1651473     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. A. R. Leach, Molecular Modelling, Principles and Applications (Addison-Wesley, Essex, 1996).
2. Computational Biochemistry and Biophysics, edited by O. M. Becker, A. D. MacKerell, Jr., B. Roux, and M. Watanabe (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001).
3. S. Izrailev, S. Stepaniants, B. Isralewitz, D. Kosztin, H. Lu, F. Molnar, W. Wriggers, and K. Schulten, in Computational Molecular Dynamics: Challenges, Methods, Ideas, Vol. 4 in Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, edited by P. Deuflhard, J. Hermans, B. Leimkuhler, A. E. Mark, S. Reich, and R. D. Skeel (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998), pp. 39-65.
4. B. Isralewitz, M. Gao, and K. Schulten, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 224 (2001).
5. A. Krammer, H. Lu, B. Isralewitz, K. Schulten, and V. Vogel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 1351 (1999).
6. M. Gao, M. Wilmanns, and K. Schulten, Biophys. J. 83, 3435 (2002).
7. M. Gao, D. Craig, V. Vogel, and K. Schulten, J. Mol. Biol. 323, 939 (2002).
8. S. Izrailev, S. Stepaniants, M. Balsera, Y. Oono, and K. Schulten, Biophys. J. 72, 1568 (1997).
9. M. V. Bayas, K. Schulten, and D. Leckband, Biophys. J. 84, 2223 (2003).
10. C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997).
11. C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5018 (1997).
12. G. E. Crooks, Phys. Rev. E 61, 2361 (2000).
13. C. Jarzynski, J. Stat. Phys. 98, 77 (2000).
14. T. Hatano and S. Sasa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3463 (2001).
15. Y. Oono and M. Paniconi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 130, 29 (1998).
16. J. Liphardt, S. Dumont, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco, Jr., and C. Bustamante, Science 296, 1832 (2002).
17. D. A. Hendrix and C. Jarzynski, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 5974 (2001).
18. G. Hummer and A. Szabo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 3658 (2001).
19. G. Hummer, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 7330 (2001).
20. D. M. Zuckerman and T. B. Woolf, Chem. Phys. Lett. 351, 445 (2002).
21. D. M. Zuckerman and T. B. Woolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 180602 (2002).
22. J. Gore, F. Ritort, and C. Bustamante, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 12564 (2003).
23. M. Ø. Jensen, S. Park, E. Tajkhorshid, and K. Schulten, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 6731 (2002).
24. R. Amaro, E. Tajkhorshid, and Z. Luthey-Schulten, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 7599 (2003).
25. S. Park, F. Khalili-Araghi, E. Tajkhorshid, and K. Schulten, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 3559 (2003).
26. D. J. Evans and D. J. Searles, Phys. Rev. E 50, 1645 (1994).
27. G. Gallavotti and E. G. D. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2694 (1995).
28. S. E. Feller, Y. Zhang, R. W. Pastor, and B. R. Brooks, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4613 (1995).
29. In thermodynamics, the term isothermal usually means that the temperature of the system remains constant during the process. Here we use the term to mean that the system is in contact with a bath at constant temperature, though the temperature of the system is not necessarily constant during the process. In fact, the system's temperature is not even defined when we deal with nonequilibrium processes. The same applies to the term isobaric.
30. Generalization of Jarzynski's equality to the isobaric-isothermal ensemble was discussed in G. E. Crooks, J. Stat. Phys. 90, 1481 (1998).
31. E. Fermi, Thermodynamics (Dover, New York, 1937).
32. C. Jarzynski, J. Stat. Phys. 96, 415 (1999).
33. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford University Press, New York, 1987).
34. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications, 2nd ed. (Academic, San Diego, 2002).
35. C. W. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985).
36. There is a third type of method, such as the isokinetic Gaussian thermostat, in which equations of motion are modified by the addition of deterministic terms, but without introducing new degrees of freedom. The nonequilibrium work relation has been established for the isokinetic Gaussian thermostat. See, D. J. Evans, Mol. Phys. 101, 1551 (2003).
37. S. Nosé, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511 (1984).
38. W. G. Hoover, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985).
39. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1980).
40. G. Binnig, C. F. Quate, and C. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986).
41. J. Marcinkiewicz, Math. Z. 44, 612 (1939).
42. R. H. Wood, W. C. F. Mühlbauer, and P. T. Thompson, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 6670 (1991).
43. J. Hermans, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 9029 (1991).
44. O. Mazonka and C. Jarzynski, cond-mat/9912121 (1999).
45. N. G. van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).
46. c.
47. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, J. Mol. Graphics 14, 33 (1996).
48. L. Kalé, R. Skeel, M. Bhandarkar, R. Brunner, A. Gursoy, N. Krawetz, J. Phillips, A. Shinozaki, K. Varadarajan, and K. Schulten, J. Comput. Phys. 151, 283 (1999).
49. A. D. MacKerell, Jr., D. Bashford, M. Bellott et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586 (1998).
50. Recall that the Gaussian nature of the work distribution depends on the assumption of the overdamped Langevin equation (Sec. III D). It is desirable to test this assumption in simulations.
51. M. Plischke and B. Bergersen, Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Word Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
52. One way of doing this is the Langevin piston method, which is introduced in Sec. II G.