Which aspects of non-clinical quality of care are most important? Results from WHO's general population surveys of "health systems responsiveness" in 41 countries

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 66, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1939-1950

  Valentine, Nicole ^a,c   Darby, Charles ^b   Bonsel, Gouke J ^c  

^a WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^b AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Comparative; Global surveys; Population priorities; Quality of care criteria; User responsiveness; WHO

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENCE; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; HEALTH IMPACT; HEALTH STATUS; POLICY MAKING; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN DIGNITY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; POPULATION RESEARCH; SEX DIFFERENCE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CONFIDENTIALITY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TIME FACTORS; WORLD HEALTH; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 41249103062     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Atkinson S. Political cultures, health systems and health policy. Social Science & Medicine 55 (2002) 113-124
2. Blendon R.J., Schoen, DesRoches C., Osborn R., and Zapert K. Common concerns amid diverse systems: health care experiences in five countries. Health Affairs 22 3 (2003) 106-121
3. Brazier J.E., Roberts J., and Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics 21 (2002) 271-292
4. Campbell S.M., Roland M.O., and Buetow S.A. Defining quality of care. Social Science & Medicine 51 (2000) 1611-1625
5. Charles C., Gafni A., and Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 44 5 (1997) 681-692
6. Cleary P. The increasing importance of patient surveys. British Medical Journal 319 720 (1999) 721
7. Coulter A., and Jenkinson C. European patients' views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. European Journal of Public Health 15 4 (2005) 355-360
8. De Silva A. A framework for measuring responsiveness. (Discussion Paper 32). Available from: (2000). http://www.who.int/responsiveness/papers (Accessed 01.12.05)
9. Dillman D.A., and Tarnai J. Mode effects of cognitively designed recall questions: a comparison of answers to telephone and mail surveys. In: Biemer P.P., Groves R.M., Lyberg L.E., Mathiowetz N.A., and Sudman S. (Eds). Measurement Errors in Surveys (1991), Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York 73-93
10. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: The definition of quality and approaches to assessment (1980), Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan
11. Fischer E.P., Shumway M., and Owen R.R. Priorities of consumers, providers and family members in the treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services 53 6 (2002) 724-729
12. Fung C.H., Elliott M.N., Hays R.D., Kahn K.L., Kanouse D.E., McGlynn E.A., et al. Patients' preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician. Health Services Research 40 4 (2005) 957-977
13. Gandek B., Ware Jr. J.E., Aaronson N.K., Alonso J., Aplone G., Bjorner J., et al. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA project. [Special issue]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 11 (1998) 1149-1158
14. Gostin L., Hodge G., Valentine N.B., and Nygren-Krug H. The domains of health responsiveness: a human rights assessment. Available from: (2002). http://www.who.int/responsiveness/papers/en/ (Accessed 01.12.05)
15. Groenewegen P.P., Kerssens J.J., Sixma H.J., van der Eijk I., and Boerma W.G.W. What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views. BMC Health Services Research 5 (2005) 16
16. Grol R., Wensing M., Mainz J., Ferreira P., Hearnshaw H., Hjortdahl P., et al. Patient priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. Family Practice 15 1 (1999) 4-11
17. Häkkinen U., Ollila E., Taipale V., Koivusalo U., Rissanen P., Sintonen H., et al. The World Health Report 2000: What does it tell us about health systems? Analyses by Finnish experts (2001), National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health (STAKES), Helsinki, Finland. Available from: http://www2.stakes.fi/verkkojulk/pdf/Themes7-2000.pdf#search=%22H% (Accessed 28.08.06)
18. Hudson S., Weisman C., Anderson R., and Camacho F. The development and validation of the primary care satisfaction survey for women. Women's Health Issues 14 (2004) 35-50
19. Inglehart R. Globalization and postmodern values. The Washington Quarterly (2000) 214-228
20. Jung H.P., Baerveldt C., Olesen F., Grol R., and Wensing M. Patient characteristics as predictors of primary health care preferences: a systematic literature analysis. Health Expectations 6 2 (2003, June) 160-181
21. Kelley E., and Hurst J. Health care quality indicators project conceptual framework paper. OECD Health Working Papers No. 23. Available from: (2006). http://www.oecd.org (Accessed 15.03.06)
22. Kerssens J.J., Groenewegen P.P., Sixma H.J., Boerma W.G., and van der Eijk I. Comparison of patient evaluations of health care quality in relation to WHO measures of achievement in 12 European countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 82 (2004) 106-114
23. Mooney G., and Wiseman V. World health report 2000: challenging a world view. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 5 (2000) 198-199
24. Murray C.J.L., and Frenk J. A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78 6 (2000) 717-731
25. Pickard S., Sheaff R., and Dowling B. Exit, voice, governance and user-responsiveness: the case of English primary care trusts. Social Science & Medicine 63 (2006) 373-383
26. Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in health care. British Medical Journal 328 (2004) 360-361
27. Sekimoto M., Asai A., Ohnishi M., Nishigaki E., Fukui T., Shimbo T., et al. Patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making in Japan. BMC Family Practice 5 1 (2004)
28. Sitzia J., and Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Social Science & Medicine 45 12 (1997) 1829-1843
29. Sitzia J., and Wood N. Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 10 4 (1998) 311-317
30. Sofaer S., Crofton C., Goldstein E., Hoy E., and Crabb J. What do consumers want to know about the quality of care in hospitals?. Health Services Research 40 6p2 (2005) 2018-2037
31. Stewart M. Reflections on the doctor-patient relationship from evidence and experience. British Journal of General Practice 55 519 (2005, October) 793-801
32. Thompson S.C., Pitts J.S., and Schwankovsky L. Preferences for involvement in medical decision-making: situational and demographic influences. Patient Education and Counseling 22 (1993) 133-140
33. UNDP. Human development report (2001), UNDP, New York
34. UNESCO. Educational statistic. Available from: (2002). http://www.uis.unesco.org/ (Accessed May 2005)
35. Ustun B.S., Chatterji S., Villanueva M., Bendib L., Celik C., Sadana R., et al. WHO multi-country survey study on health and responsiveness 2000-2001. (Discussion Paper 37). Available from: (2003). http://www.who.int /responsiveness/papers/en/ Accessed 01.02.06
36. Valentine N., Bonsel G.J., and Murray C.J.L. Measuring quality of health care from the user's perspective in 41 countries: psychometric properties of WHO's questions on health systems responsiveness. Quality of Life Research 16 7 (2007) 1107-1125
37. Van Campen C., Sixma J.J., Kerssens H.J., Peters L., and Rasker J.J. Assessing patients' priorities and perceptions of the quality of health care: the development of the QUOTE-rheumatic-patients instrument. British Journal of Rheumatology 37 (1998) 362-368
38. Wait S., and Nolte E. Public involvement policies in health: exploring their conceptual basis. Health Economics, Policy and Law 1 (2006) 149-162
39. Welzel C., Inglehart R., and Klingemann H. The theory of human development: a cross-cultural analysis. European Journal of Political Research 42 (2003) 341-379
40. Wensing M., and Elwyn G. Improving the quality of health care: methods for incorporating patients' views in health care. British Medical Journal 326 (2003) 877-879
41. Wensing M., Jung H.P., Mainz J., Olesen F., and Grol R. A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: description of the research domain. Social Science & Medicine 47 10 (1998) 1573-1588
42. Westaway M.S., Rheeder P., Van Zyl D.G., and Seager J.R. Interpersonal and organizational dimensions of patient satisfaction: the moderating effects of health status. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 15 4 (2003) 337-344
43. WHO. The world health report 2002 - Reducing risks, promoting healthy life (2002), WHO, Geneva
44. Williams S.J., and Calnan M. Convergence and divergence: assessing criteria of consumer satisfaction across general practice, dental and hospital care settings. Social Science & Medicine 33 6 (1991) 707-716