Unfinished turns in french conversation: How context matters

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-30

  Chevalier, Fabienne H G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41249090437     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08351810701691115     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Arnold, J. E., Fagnano M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2003). Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 25-36.
2. Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferreira, F. (2003). Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path, sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 183-200.
3. Bergmann, J. R. (1992). Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 137-162). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Billig, M., & Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis: An exchange between Michael Billig and Emanuel A. Schegloff. Discourse and Society, 10, 543-582.
5. Blommaert, J. (2001). Context is/as critique. Critique of Anthropology, 21, 13-32.
6. Brennan, S. E., & Schober, M. E. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 274-296.
7. Bruxelles, S., & Traverso, V. (2001). Ben: Apport de la description d'un 'petit mot' du discours à l'étude des polylogues E "Ben": Contribution of the description of a "small" discourse particle to the study of multi-party interaction]. Marges Linguistiques, 2, 38-55.
8. Chevalier, F. H. G. (2005). To complete or not to complete: A. conversation-analytic study of unfinished turns in French conversation. Unpublished doctoral, thesis, University of Essex, United Kingdom.
9. Chevalier, F. H. G., & Clift, R. (in press). Unfinished turns in French conversation: Projectability, syntax and. action. Journal of Pragmatics.
10. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Chomsky, N. (1972). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
12. Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73-111.
13. Cooren, F. (2005). The contribution of speech act theory to the analysis of conversation: How pre-sequences work. In K. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (EMs.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 21-40), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Díaz, F., Antaki, C., & Collins, A. F. (1996). Using completion to formulate a statement collectively. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 525-542.
15. Drew, P. (1984). Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 129-151). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Drew, P. (1995). Interaction sequences and anticipatory interactive planning. In E. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 111-138). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Passing and the managed achievement of sex status in an intersexed person. In H. Garfinkel, Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 116-185). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18. Goody, E. (Ed.) (1995). Social intelligence and interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Heritage, J. (1990-1991). Intention, meaning and strategy: Observations on constraints on interaction analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 311-332.
20. Jefferson, G. (1983). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a "standard maximum, silence" of approximately one second in conversation. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, 42, 1-83.
21. Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 346-369). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances:. A. pedagogical, practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 277-309.
23. Lerner, G. H. (1991). On the syntax of sentences in progress. language in Society, 20, 441-458.
24. Lerner, G. H. (1995). Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19, 111-131.
25. Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the "semi-permeable" character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238-276). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Levinson, S. C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 221-260). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Mandelbaum, J. (1990-1991). Beyond mundane reason: Conversation analysis and context. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 330-350.
29. Merlo, S., & Mansur, L. L. (2004). Descriptive discourse: Topic familiarity and disfluencies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 489-503.
30. Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling "my side": "Limited access" as a "fishing" device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186-198.
31. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 56-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Sacks, H (1992). Lectures in conversation (G. Jefferson, Ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
33. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language, 50, 696-735.
34. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. The American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
35. Schegloff, E. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Eld.), Everyday language studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 23-78). New York: Irvington.
36. Schegloff, E. A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?." Sociological Inquiry, 50, 104-152.
37. Schegloff, E. A. (1987a). Practices and action: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499-545.
38. Schegloff, E. A. (1987b). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organisation. In G. Button & J. R. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 70-85). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
39. Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Pre-sequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 55-62.
40. Schegloff, E. A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of "coherence" in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 51-77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. Schegloff, E. A. (1991a). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially-shared cognition (pp. 150-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Schegloff, E. A. (1991b). Reflections on talk, and social structure. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (EMs.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44-70). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
43. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided for place for the defence of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1295-1345.
44. Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Confirming allusions: Toward, an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161-216.
45. Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Third turn repair. In G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin, & J. Baugh (Eds.), Towards a social science of language 2 (pp. 31-40). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
47. Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When "others" initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 2, 205-243.
48. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Aprimer in conversation Analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
50. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289-327.
51. Silverman, D. (1994). Describing sexual activities in HIV counseling: The cooperative management of the moral order. Text, 14, 427-453.
52. Stainton, R. J. (1994). Using non-sentences: An application of relevance theory. Pragmatics and Cognition, 2, 269-284.
53. Stainton, R. J. (1997). Utterance meaning and syntactic ellipsis. Pragmatics and Cognition, 5, 51-78.
54. Stainton, R. J. (2000). The meaning of sentences. Noûs, 34, 441-454.
55. Streeck, J. (1995). On projection. In E. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 87-110). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
56. Terasaki, A. K. (2004). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 171-223). Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Original work published 1976)
57. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 387-412.