Probabilistic risk assessment for the construction phases of a bridge construction based on finite element analysis

Finite Elements in Analysis and Design

Volumn 44, Issue 6-7, 2008, Pages 383-400

  Cho, Taejun ^a   Kim, Tae Soo ^b  

^a Korea Rail Network Authority   (South Korea)

^b Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Construction phases; Finite element analysis; Improved response surface method; Risk assessment; Virtual construction

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LIFE CYCLE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY FACTOR;

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT; CONSTRUCTION PHASES; IMPROVED RESPONSE SURFACE METHODS; VIRTUAL CONSTRUCTION;

SUSPENSION BRIDGES;

EID: 41249086680     PISSN: 0168874X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2007.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. PMIS Solutions in the Korean Construction Industry, The construction and economy research in statute of Korea (CERIK), Research Report, 2003.
2. Han S.-H., Chin K.-H., and Chae M.-J. Evaluation of CITIS as a collaborative virtual organization for construction project management. Autom. Constr. 16 (2007) 199-211
3. Korea Rail Network Authority, Problems and solutions for the safety managements in the construction of railway structures, Research Report 05-2-394, 2006.
4. Cochran W.G. Sampling Techniques. third ed. (1977), Wiley, New York
5. Fishman G. Monte Carlo, Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications (1995), Springer, Berlin
6. Cheng J., and Druzdzel M.J. An adaptive importance sampling algorithm for evidential reasoning in large Bayesian networks. J. Artif. Intell. 13 (2000) 155-188
7. Minasny B., and McBratney A.B. A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Comput. Geosci. 32 9 (2006) 1378-1388
8. Novák D., and Lehký D. ANN inverse analysis based on stochastic small-sample training set simulation. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 19 7 (2006) 731-740
9. Rosenthal J.S. Markov chain convergence: from finite to infinite. Stochastic Process. Appl. 62 (1996) 55-72
10. Andrieu C., DjuricH P.M., and Doucet A. Model selection by MCMC computation. Signal Process. 81 (2001) 19-37
11. T. Hisada, S. Nakagiri, Role of stochastic finite element method in structural safety and reliability, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR'85, 1985, pp. 385-395.
12. Ghanem R.-G., and Spanos P.-D. Stochastic Finite Elements-A Spectral Approach (1991), Springer, Berlin
13. T. Takada, Weighted integral method in stochastic finite element analysis, Probab. Eng. Mech. 5(3), 146-156; G. Deodatis, The weighted integral method, I: stochastic stiffness matrix, J. Eng. Mech. 117(8) (1991) 1851-1864.
14. Deodatis G., and Shinozuka M. The weighted integral method, II: response variability and reliability. J. Eng. Mech. 117 8 (1991) 1865-1877
15. Imai K., and Frangopol D.M. System reliability of suspension bridges. Struct. Saf. 24 (2002) 219-259
16. Cho T., and Song M. Structural reliability of a suspension bridge affected by environmentally assisted cracking. J. Korean Soc. Civ. Eng. 10 1 (2006) 21-31
17. Bryja D., and Sniady P. Stochastic non-linear vibrations of highway suspension bridge under inertial sprung moving load. J. Sound Vib. 216 3 (1998) 507-519
18. Korean Cable Steel Bridge Design Guidelines, Korea Civil Engineering Society (KSCE), 2006.
19. Nowak A.S., and Cho T. Prediction of the combination of failure modes for an arch bridge system. J. Constr. Steel Res. 63 (2007) 1561-1569
20. Park M., Cho T., and Cho H. Probabilistic risk assessment of a cable-stayed bridge based on the prediction method for the combination of failure modes. J. Korean Soc. Civ. Eng. 26 4A (2006) 647-657
21. Han S., Cho T., and Bang M. The sensitivity analysis and safety evaluations of cable stayed bridges based on probabilistic finite element method. Korea Struct. Meas. Inst. 11 1 (2007) 141-154
22. Irfan K., and McMahonb C.A. A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural risk assessment. Probab. Eng. Mech. 20 (2005) 11-17
23. Box G.E.P., and Wilson K.B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 13 (1951) 1-45
24. Bucher C.G., and Bourgund U. A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems. Struct. Saf. 7 1 (1990) 57-66
25. Rajashekhar M.R., and Ellingwood B.R. A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 12 (1993) 205-220
26. Guan X.L., and Melchers R.E. Effect of response surface parameters variation on structural reliability estimates. Struct. Saf. 23 (2001) 429-444
27. Engelund S., and Rackwitz R. A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability. Struct. Saf. 12 4 (1993) 255-276
28. Cho T. Prediction of cyclic freeze-thaw damage in concrete structures based upon response surface method. Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (2007) 2031-2040
29. Lee S.H., and Kwak B.M. Response surface augmented moment method for efficient reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 28 (2006) 261-272
30. Casciati F., and Faravelli L. Fragility Analysis of Complex Structural Systems (1991), Research Studies Press
31. Kim S., and Na S. Response surface method using vector projected sampling points. Struct Safety 19 1 (1997) 3-19
32. Lee S.H., and Kwak B.M. Response surface augmented moment method for efficient reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 28 (2006) 261-272
33. H. Pircher & Partner GmbH, RM2004 User's Manual, TDV Technische Datenverarbeitung, 2004.
34. Rackwitz R., and Fiessler B. Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput. Struct. 9 (1978) 489-494
35. Nowak A.S., and Collins K.R. Reliability of Structures vol. 268 (2000), McGraw-Hill, New York
36. Ayyub B.M. Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis in Civil Engineering (1998), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL