A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis

Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 11-17

  Kaymaz, Irfan ^a   McMahon, Chris A ^b  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Response surface methods; Structural reliability methods; Weighted regression

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POLYNOMIALS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY METHODS; WEIGHTED REGRESSION;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 10844245456     PISSN: 02668920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO. Structural reliability methods. Chichester: Wiley; 1996.
2. Shinozuka M. Basic analysis of structural safety. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1983;109(3):721-40.
3. Tvedt L. Distribution of quadratic forms in normal space-application to structural reliability. J Eng Mech 1990;16(6):1183-97.
4. Bargmann H, Rustenberg I, Devlukia J. Reliability of metal components in fatigue - a simple algorithm for the exact solution. Int J Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1994;17(12):1445-57.
5. Bjerager P. Probability integration by directional simulation. J Eng Mech 1988;114(8):1285-301.
6. Bucher CG. Adaptive sampling - an iterative fast Monte Carlo procedure. Struct Saf 1988;5(2):119-26.
7. Melchers RE. Search-based importance sampling. Struct Saf 1990; 9(2):117-28.
8. Wang L, Grandhi RV. Safety index calculation using intervening variables for structural reliability analysis. Comput Struct 1996;59(6):1139-48.
9. Venter G, Haftka RT, Starnes JH. Construction of response surfaces for design optimization applications. In: Proceedings of the Sixth AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, Washington, September 4-6. In: Paper No. 96-4040, Part 1, p. 548-64.
10. Bucher CG, Bourgund U. A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems. Struct Saf 1990;7(1):57-66.
11. Kim S, Na S. Response surface method using vector projected sampling points. Struct Saf 1997;19(1):3-19.
12. Rajashekhar MR, Ellingwood BR. A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis. Struct Saf 1993;12(3):205-20.
13. Box GEP, Wilson KB. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J R Stat Soc 1951;Series B(13):1-45.
14. Venter G, Haftka RT. Minimum-bias based experimental design for constructing surfaces in structural optimization. In: Proceedings of the 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, April 7-10, Part 2, p. 1225-38.
15. Giunta AA. Aircraft multidisciplinary optimization using design of experiments theory and response surface modelling methods. PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1997.
16. Das PK, Zheng Y. Cumulative formation of response surface and its use in reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech 2000;15:309-15.
17. Gayton N, Bourinet JM, Lemaire M. CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis. Struct Saf 2003;25(1):99-121.
18. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. In: Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: Wiley; 1995.
19. COMREL, http://www.strurel.de.
20. Liu P-L, Der Kiureghian A. Optimization algorithm for structural reliability analysis. Report No. UCB/SESM-86/09, California, Berkeley.
21. Guan XL, Melchers RE. Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates. Struct Saf 2001;23(4):429-44.