Robotic system for no-scar gastrointestinal surgery

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 15-22

  Phee, S J ^a   Low, S C ^a   Sun, Z L ^a   Ho, K Y ^b   Huang, W M ^a   Thant, Z M ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Endoscope; Master slave; Robotics; Surgery

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); MANIPULATORS; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SLAVE ROBOTS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

CABLE-DRIVEN; FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; MASTER SLAVE; MASTER-SLAVE ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; SIMPLE++; SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS; THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTION;

ENDOSCOPY;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ENDOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; NONHUMAN; ROBOTICS; SCAR FORMATION; SWINE;

EID: 41149180175     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.179     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Phee L, Ng WS, Chen IM, et al. Locomotion and steering aspects in automation of colonoscopy. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1997; 16(6): 85-96.
2. Intuitive Surgical Inc: http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/.
3. Carrozza MC, Dario P, Phee L. Micromechatronics in surgery. Trans Inst Measurem Control 2003; 25(4): 309-327.
4. Friconneau JP, Garrec P, Gosselin F, et al. Status and trends in force feedback master arm at CEA. IARP Workshop, Rome, 2002.
5. Tavakoli M, Patel RV, Moallem M. Design issues in a haptics-based master-slave system for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Orleans, LA, USA, April 2004; 371-376.
6. Low SC, Phee L. A review of master-slave robotic systems for surgery. IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, Singapore, December 2004; 37-42.
7. Hayward V, Gregorio P, Astley O, et al. Freedom-7: a high fidelity seven axis haptic device with application to surgical training. In Experimental Robotics. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science No. 232. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1998; 445-456.
8. Mitsuishi M, Arata J, Tanaka K, et al. Development of a remote minimally-invasive surgical system with operational environment transmission capability. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, 14-19 September 2003; vol 2; 2663-2670.
9. Tadakuma R, Asahara Y, Kajikoto H, et al. Development of anthropomorphic multi-DOF master-slave arm for mutual telexistence. IEEE Trans Visualiz Comput Graphics 2005; 11: 626-636.
10. NASA Technical Briefing. Sensory feedback exoskeletal arm controller: http://www.nasatech.com/Briefs/Apr04/MSC22563.html.
11. Stanton N, Hedge A, Brookhuis K, et al. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods. CRC Press: London, UK, 2005.
12. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST). Estimation method of center of rotation of functional shoulder joint: http://www.dh.aist.go.jp/research/centered/shoulder/index.php.en.
13. Craig JJ. Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall: New Jersey, USA, 2005.
14. Kaneko M, Yamashita T, Tanie K. Basic considerations on transmission characteristics for tendon drive robots. Advanced Robotics 1991: Robots in Unstructured Environments (91 ICAR), Fifth International Conference, vol 1, Pisa, Italy, 19-22 June 1991; 827-832.