Professional learning portfolios for argumentation in school science

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 669-688

  Simon, Shirley ^a   Johnson, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41149087367     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690701854873     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adey, P., Hewitt, G., Hewitt, J. and Landau, N. (2004) The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, UK
2. Alexander, R. (2005) Towards dialogic teaching, Dialogos, York, UK
3. Barnett, R. (1997) Higher education: A critical business, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
4. Bell, B. and Gilbert, J. (1996) Teacher development: A model from science education, RoutledgeFalmer, London
5. Davis and Honan, E (1998) Reflections on the use of teams to support the portfolio process. With portfolio in hand: Validating the new professionalism, Teachers College Press, New York
6. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. and Scott, P. (1996) Young people's images of science, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
7. Driver, R., Newton, P. and Osborne, J. (2000) Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84:3, pp. 287-312.
8. Erduran, S., Simon, S. and Osborne, J. (2004) TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88:6, pp. 915-933.
9. Fullan, M. (2001) The new meaning of educational change, RoutledgeFalmer, London
10. Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S., Whiting, C. and Whitty, G. (2000) Teacher education in transition: Re-forming professionalism?, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
11. Grant, G. E. and Huebner, T. A. (1998) The portfolio question: The power of self-directed inquiry. With portfolio in hand: Validating the new professionalism, pp. 156-171. Teachers College Press, New York
12. Hatton, N. and Smith, D. (1995) Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11:1, pp. 33-49.
13. Hoban, G. (2002) Teacher learning for educational change, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
14. Hoel, T. L. and Haugalokken, O. K. (2004) Response groups as learning resources when working with portfolios. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30:3, pp. 225-241.
15. Hogan, K. and Maglienti, M. (2001) Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38:6, pp. 663-687.
16. Jiménex-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodríguez, A. B. and Duschl, R. (2000) 'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science': Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84:6, pp. 757-792.
17. Joyce, B. and Showers, B. (1988) Student achievement through staff development, Longman, White Plains, NY
18. Klenowski, V. (2002) Developing portfolios for learning and assessment, RoutledgeFalmer, London
19. Kuhn, D. (1991) The skills of argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
20. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S. and Hewson, P. (2003) Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics, Corwin Press Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA
21. (1998) With portfolio in hand: Validating the new professionalism, Teachers College Press, New York
22. Lyons, T. (2006) Different countries, same science classes; Students' experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28:6, pp. 591-613.
23. (1998) Beyond 2000: Science education for the future, King's College London, London
24. Mortimer, E. and Scott, P. (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms, Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK
25. Osborne, J., Erduran, S. and Simon, S. (2004) Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41:10, pp. 994-1020.
26. Osborne, J., Erduran, S. and Simon, S. (2004) Ideas, evidence and argument in science, Nuffield Foundation, London
27. Paulson, P. R. and Meyer, C. A. (1991) What makes a portfolio a portfolio?. Educational Leadership, 45:5, pp. 60-63.
28. Pedro, J. (2005) Reflection in teacher education: Exploring pre-service teachers' meaning of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 6:1, pp. 49-66.
29. Scḧn, D. (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in Aaction, Basic Books, New York
30. Shulman, L. (1992) Portfolios in teacher education: A component of reflective teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association San Francisco
31. Simon, S., Osborne, J. and Erduran, S. (2003) Systemic teacher development to enhance the use of argumentation in school science activities. Leadership and professional development in science education: New possibilities for enhancing teacher learning, pp. 198-217. RoutledgeFalmer, London & New York
32. Simon, S., Erduran, S. and Osborne, J. (2006) Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28:2, pp. 235-260.
33. Snadden, D. and Thomas, M. (1998) The use of portfolio learning in medical education. Medical Teacher, 20:3, pp. 192-199.
34. Spillane, J. S. (1999) External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31:2, pp. 143-175.
35. Toulmin, S. (1958) The uses of argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
36. Turner, K. and Simon, S. (2007) Portfolios for learning; teachers' professional development through M-level portfolios. New designs for teachers' professional learning, pp. 89-115. Institute of Education Bedford Way Papers, London
37. Zohar, A. and Nemet, F. (2002) Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39:1, pp. 35-62.