Equity and justice

Psychology of Entertainment

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 273-290

  Schmitt, Manfred ^a   Maes, Jäurgen ^b  

^a University of Koblenz Landau ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41049099461     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (90)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology Vol.(2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Arts, W., Hermkens, P., & van Wijck, P. (1995). Anomie, distributive justice and dissatisfaction with material wellbeing in Eastern Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 34, 1-16.
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
4. Berkowitz, L., &Walster, E. (Eds.) (1976). Equity Theory: Toward a General Theory of Social Interaction. (Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.
5. Bies, R. J. (1987). Beyond "voice": The influence of decision maker justification and sincerity on procedural fairness judgments. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 17, 3-14.
6. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43-55.
7. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199-218.
8. Brewer, W. F. (1996). Good and bad story endings and story completeness. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics pp.(261-274). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
9. Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473-486.
10. Bryant, J., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., & Cantor, J. R. (Eds.) (2003). Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12. Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
13. Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechteWelt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen [Belief in a just world as a motive: Validation and correlates of two scales]. Psychologische Beiträge, 29, 596-615.
14. Dar, Y., & Resh, N. (2001). Exploring the multifaceted structure of sense of deprivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 63-81.
15. Davey, L. M., Bobocel, D. R., Hing, L. S. S., & Zanna, M. P. (1999). Preference for the Merit Principle Scale: An individual difference measure of distributive justice preferences. Social Justice Research, 12, 223-240.
16. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
17. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
19. Fein, D. (1976). Just world responding in 6-and 9-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 12, 79-80.
20. Fetchenhauer, D., & Huang, X. (2004). Justice sensitivity and behavior in experimental games. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1015-1031.
21. Friedman, N. (1975). Form and meaning in fiction. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
22. Gergen, K. J., Morse, S. J., & Gergen, M. (1980). Behavior exchange in cross-cultural perspective. In H. Triandis & R.W. Brislin (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology Vol.(5,121-153)pp. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
24. Herrmann, T., & Winterhoff, P. (1980). Leistungsbezogenes Aufteilen als situationsspezifische Korrektur von Gerechtigkeitskonzepten-Zum Einfluß von Personenmerkmalen auf die Gewinnaufteilung [Achievement-related allocation of goods as situation-specific correction of general justice notions-On the influence of personality on allocation behavior]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 11, 259-273.
25. Hormuth, S. E., & Stephan, W. G. (1981). Effects of viewing "Holocaust" on Germans and Americans: A just-world analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 240-251.
26. Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D.,&Miles, E.W. (1985). Test for individual perceptions of job equity: Some preliminary findings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1055-1064.
27. Jose, P. E., & Brewer, W. F. (1984). Development of story liking: Character identification, suspense, and outcome resolution. Developmental Psychology, 20, 911-924.
28. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive in social behavior. Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.
29. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
30. Lerner, M. J. (2003). The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 388-399.
31. Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol.(9, pp. 133-162). New York: Academic Press.
32. Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1050.
33. Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer's reaction to the "innocent victim." Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203-210.
34. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
35. Lind, A. E., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
36. Lipkus, I. M. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1171-1178.
37. Maes, J. (1994). Blaming the victim-belief in control or belief in justice? Social Justice Research, 7, 69-90.
38. Maes, J. (1998). Immanent justice and ultimate justice: Two ways of believing in justice. In L. Montada, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimization and belief in a just world (pp. 9-40). New York: Plenum Press.
39. Major, B., & Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In J. Greenberg, & R.L. Cohen (Eds.)(1982). Equity and justice in social behavior. (pp. 43-76). New York: Academic Press.
40. Marques, J. M., & Páez, D. (1994). The 'Black Sheep effect': Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology Vol.(5, 37-68)pp. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
41. Mikula, G., Petri, B.,&Tanzer, N. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 133-149.
42. Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769-783.
43. Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-553.
44. Miller, W. I. (1998). Clint Eastwood and equity: Popular culture's theory of revenge. In A. Sarat, & T. R. Kearns (Eds.), Law in the domains of culture (pp. 161-202). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
45. Montada, L. (1980). Developmental changes in concepts of justice. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 257-284). New York: Springer.
46. Montada, L. (1993). Understanding oughts by assessing moral reasoning or moral emotions. In G. Noam, & T. Wren (Eds.), The moral self (pp. 292-309). Boston: MIT-Press.
47. Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313-344.
48. Oswald, M. E, Hupfeld, J., Klug, S. C, & Gabriel, U. (2002). Lay-perspectives on criminal deviance, goals of punishment, and punitivity. Social Justice Research, 15, 85-98.
49. Perrine, L. (1959). Story and structure. New York: Harcourt & Brace.
50. Piaget, J. (1932). Je jugement moral chez l'enfant. [The moral judgment of the child]. Paris: Alcan.
51. Raney, A. A. (2002). Moral judgment as a predictor of enjoyment of crime drama. Media Psychology, 4, 305-322.
52. Raney, A. A. (2003a). Disposition-based theories of enjoyment. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & J. R. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 61-84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Raney, A. A. (2003b). Enjoyment of sport spectatorship. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & J. R. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 397-416). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Raney, A. A., & Bryant, J. (2002). Moral judgment and crime drama: An integrated theory of enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 52, 402-415.
55. Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1-7.
56. Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the National Draft Lottery Journal of Social Issues, 29(4), 73-93.
57. Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. New York: Pantheon Books.
58. Sabbagh, C. (2001). A taxonomy of normative and empirically oriented theories of distributive justice. Social Justice Research, 14, 237-263.
59. Sabbagh, C., Dar,Y.,&Resh, N. (1994). The structure of social justice judgments:Afacet approach. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 244-261.
60. Sabbagh, C., & Schmitt, M. (1998). Exploring the structure of positive and negative justice judgments. Social Justice Research, 12, 381-396.
61. Scherer, K. R., Wallbott, H. G., & Summerfield, A. B. (Eds.) (1986). Experiencing emotion: A cross-cultural study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Schmitt, M. (1996). Individual differences in sensitivity to befallen injustice. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 3-20.
63. Schmitt, M. (1998). Methodological strategies in research to validate measures of belief in a just world. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimization and belief in a just world (pp. 187-215). New York: Plenum Press.
64. Schmitt, M., Behner, R., Montada, L., Müller, L., & Müller-Fohrbrodt, G. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and education as privileges: Exploring the generalizability of the existential guilt reaction. Social Justice Research, 13, 313-337.
65. Schmitt, M., & Dörfel, M. (1999). Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 443-453.
66. Schmitt, M., Eid, M., & Maes, J. (2003). Synergistic person x situation interaction in distributive justice behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 141-147.
67. Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Förster, N.,&Montada, L. (2004). Effects of objective and subjective account components on forgiving. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 465-485.
68. Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice Sensitivity: Assessment and Location in the Personality Space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202-211.
69. Schmitt, M., Neumann, R., & Montada, L. (1995). Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice. Social Justice Research, 8, 385-407.
70. Schmitt, M., & Sabbagh, C. (2004). Synergistic person × situation interaction in distributive justice judgment and allocation behavior. Personality and individual Differences, 37, 359-371.
71. Schwinger, T. (1980). Just allocations of goods: Decisions among three principles. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 95-125). Bern: Huber.
72. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman.
73. Skarlicki, D. P.,&Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in theworkplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
74. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
75. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations pp.(7-24). 2nd ed.; Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
76. Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77. Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In K. Scherer (Ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 175-236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Tyler, T.R. (1986). Procedural justice in organizations. In R. Lewicki, M. Bazerman,&B.H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations Vol. (1, pp. 7-73). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
79. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
80. Tyler, T. R.,&Smith, H. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske,&G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology Vol.(II, pp. 595-629). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. van den Bos, K., Maas, M., Waldring, I., & Semin, G. P. (2003). Toward understanding the psychology of reactions to perceived fairness: The role of affect intensity. Social Justice Research, 16, 151-168.
82. Vidmar, N. (2001). Retribution and revenge. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 31-63). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
83. Wenzel, M. (2002). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers' identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 629-645.
84. Zillmann, D. (1991). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In J. Bryant, & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception of reaction and processes (pp. 135-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
85. Zillmann, D. (2000). Basal morality in drama appreciation. In I. Bondebjerg (Ed.), Moving images, culture, and the mind (pp. 53-63). Luton, England: University of Luton Press.
86. Zillmann, D. (2003). Theory of affective dynamics: Emotions and moods. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & J. R. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 533-567). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
87. Zillmann, D.,&Bryant, J. (1975). Viewer's moral sanction of retribution in the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 572-582.
88. Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1977). Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 155-165.
89. Zillmann, D., Taylor, K., & Lewis, K. (1998). News as nonfiction theatre: How dispositions toward the public cast of characters affect reactions. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42, 153-169.
90. Zillmann, D.,&Vorderer, P. (Eds.) (2000). Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.