Ultrasonography on labour ward;Place de l'échographie en salle de naissance

Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 261-271

  Gaudineau, A ^a   Vayssiere C ^a  

^a SIHCUS CMCO Centre Medico Chirurgical et Obstetrical   (France)

Author keywords

Fetal presentation; Induction; Labour ward; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

AMNION FLUID; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FETUS WEIGHT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LABOR; LABOR INDUCTION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE LABOR; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; VAGINA BLEEDING; WARD;

EID: 40949146059     PISSN: 12979589     EISSN: 17696682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2007.09.022     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Sherer D.M. Intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30 (2007) 123-139
2. Ayers J.W.T., DeGrood R.M., Compton A.A., Barclay M., and Ansbacher R. Sonographic evaluation of cervical length in pregnancy: diagnosis and management of preterm cervical effacement in patients at risk for premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol 71 (1988) 939-944
3. Andersen H.F., Nugent C.E., Wanty S.D., and Hayashi R.H. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163 (1990) 859-867
4. Kushnir O., Vigil A., Izquierdo L., Schiff M., and Curet L.B. Vaginal ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162 (1990) 991-993
5. Joffe G.M., Del Valle G.O., Izquierdo L.A., Gilson G.J., Smith J.F., Chatterjee M.S., et al. Diagnosis of cervical change in pregnancy by means of transvaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166 (1992) 896-900
6. Riley L., Frigoletto F.D., and Benacerraf B.R. The implications of sonographically identified cervical changes in patients not necessarily at risk for preterm birth. J Ultrasound Med 11 (1992) 75-79
7. Murakawa H., Utumi T., Hasegawa I., Tanaka K., and Fuzimori R. Evaluation of threatened preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 82 (1993) 829-832
8. Iams J.D., Paraskos J., Landon M.B., Teteris J.N., and Johnson F.F. Cervical sonography in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 84 (1994) 40-46
9. Gomez R., Galasso M., Romero R., Mazor M., Sorokin Y., Goncalves L., et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171 (1994) 956-964
10. Leitich H., Brunbauer M., Kaider A., Egarter C., and Husslein P. Cervical length and dilitation ofthe internal cervical os detected by vaginal ultrasonography as markers for preterm delivery: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181 (1999) 1465-1472
11. Zalar R.W. Transvaginal ultrasound and preterm prelabor: a nonrandomized intervention study. Obstet Gynecol 88 (1996) 20-23
12. Goffinet F., and Kayem G. Diagnosis and prognosis of preterm labor: physical examination and ultrasonography. J Gynecol Obstet Reprod 31 (2002) 5S22-5S34
13. Rageth J.C., Kernen B., Saurenmann E., and Unger C. Premature contractions: possible influence of sonographic measurement of cervical length on clinical management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9 (1997) 183-187
14. Buist R. Induction of labour: indications and obstetric outcomes in a teriary referral hospital. N Z Med J 112 (1999) 251-253
15. Gucciardo L., Thoumsin H., and Foidart J.M. The effects of labor induction on the progress of childbirth. Rev Med Liege 53 (1998) 665-668
16. Hendrix N.W., Chauhan S.P., Morrison J.C., Magann E.F., Martin J.N., and Devoe L.D. Bishop score: a poor driagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. South Med J 91 (1998) 248-252
17. Dhall K., Mittal S.C., and Kumar A. Evaluation of prenduction scoring systems. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 27 (1987) 309-311
18. Hughey M.J., McElin T.W., and Bird C.C. An evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Obstet Gynecol 48 (1976) 635-641
19. Crane J.M.G., Van den Hof M., Armson B.A., et al. The use of transvaginal ultrasound in the prediction of preterm delivery. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 20 (1998) 379-386
20. Iams J.D., Goldenberg R.L., Meis P.J., et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 334 (1996) 567-572
21. Paterson-Brown S., Fisk N.M., Edmonds D.K., et al. Preinduction cervix assesment by Bishop's score and transvaginal ultrasound. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 40 (1991) 17-23
22. Pandis G.K., Papageorghiou A.T., Ramanathan V.G., et al. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the predicion of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18 (2001) 623-628
23. Ware V., and Raynor B.D. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182 (2000) 1030-1032
24. Rane S.M., Guirgis R.R., Higgins B., et al. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24 (2004) 538-549
25. Rovas L., Sladkevicius P., Strobel E., et al. three-dimensional power doppler ultrasound assessment of the cervix for the prediction of successful induction of labor with prostaglandin in prolonged pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 24 (2005) 933-939
26. Gabriel R., Darnaud T., Chalot F., et al. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneacol 19 (2002) 254-257
27. Yang S.H., Roh C.R., and Kim J.H. Transvaginal ultrasonography for cervical assessment before induction of labor. J Ultrasound Med 23 (2004) 375-382
28. Rane S.M., Guiris R.R., Higgins B., et al. Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of the need for cesaerean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22 (2003) 45-48
29. Bartha J.L., Romero-Carmona R., Martinez-Del-Fresno P., et al. Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasound for preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized clinical trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25 (2005) 155-159
30. Watson W.J., Stevens D., Welter S., et al. Factors predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 88 (1996) 990-992
31. Chandra S., Crane J.M.G., Hutchens D., et al. Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 98 (2001) 2-6
32. Gonen R., Degani S., and Ron A. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score. Eur J Ultrasound 7 (1998) 183-187
33. Reis F.M., Gervasi M.T., Florio P., et al. Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 (2003) 1361-1367
34. Roman H., Verspyck E., Vercoustre L., et al. The role of ultrasound and fetal fibronectin in predicting the length of induced labor when the cervix is unfavorable. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23 (2004) 567-573
35. Roman H., Verspyck E., Vercoustre L., et al. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23 (2004) 357-362
36. Rozenberg P., Chevret S., Chastang C., et al. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score. BJOG 112 (2005) 192-196
37. Crane J.M.G. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clinical Obstet Gynecol 49 (2006) 573-584
38. Riethmuller D., Roth P., Martin A., Maillet R., and Schaal J.P. Benefits of ultrasonography in the delivery room. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 32 (2004) 427-432
39. Pinar H., Burke S.H., Huang C.W., Singer D.B., and Sunq C.J. Reference values for transverse cerebellar diameter throughout gestation. Pediatr Dev Pathol 5 (2002) 489-494
40. Divon M.Y., Haglund B., Nisell H., Otterblad P.O., and Westgren M. Fetal and neonatal mortality in postterm pregnancy: the impact of gestational age and fetal growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178 (1998) 726-731
41. Chauhan S.P., Sanderson M., Hendrix N.W., Magann E.F., and Devoe L.D. Perinatal outcome and amniotic fluid index in the antapartum and intrapartum periods: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181 (1999) 1473-1478
42. Ghosh G., Marsal K., and Gudmundsson S. Amniotic fluid index in low-risk pregnancy as an admission test to the labor ward. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81 (2002) 852-855
43. Zhang J., Troendle J., Meikle S., Klebanoff M.A., and Rayburn W.F. Isolated oligohydramnios is not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. BJOG 111 (2004) 220-225
44. Kim S.Y., Khandelwal M., Gaughan J.P., Agar M.H., and Reece E.A. Is the intrapartum biophysical profile useful?. Obstet Gynecol 102 (2003) 471-476
45. Noumi G., Collado-Khoury F., Bombard A., Julliard K., and Weiner Z. Clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight performed during labor by residents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192 (2005) 1407-1409
46. Platek D.N., Divon M.Y., Anyaeqbunam A., and Merkatz I.R. Intrapartum ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight by the house staff. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165 (1991) 842-845
47. Parant O., Clouet-Delannoy M., Connan L., Duclusaud A., et al. Métrorragies du deuxième trimestre de la grossesse : devenir obstétrical et périnatal. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 29 (2000) 66-166
48. Tan N.H., Abu M., Woo J.L., and Tahir H.M. The role of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnoses of placenta praevia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 35 (1995) 42-45
49. Heer I.M., Muller-Egloff S., and Strauss A. Placenta praevia-comparison of four sonographic modalities. Ultraschall Med 27 (2006) 355-359
50. Timor-Tritsch I.E., and Yunis R.A. Confirming the safety of transvaginal sonography in patients suspected of placenta praevia. Obstet Gynecol 81 (1993) 742-744
51. Marpeau L., and Sentilhes L. Against planned cesarean delivery in twin gestations. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35 (2007) 588-590
52. Comstock C.H., Love Jr. J.J., Bronsteen R.A., et al. Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190 (2004) 1135-1140
53. Levine D., Hulka C.A., Ludmir J., Li W., and Edelman R.R. Placenta accreta: evaluation with color Doppler US, power Doppler US, and MR imaging. Radiology 205 (1997) 773-776
54. Kayem G., Grangé G., and Goffinet F. Management of placenta accreta. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35 (2007) 186-192
55. Carbonnel M., Tigaizin A., Carbillon L., Seince N., Benchimol M., and Uzan M. Vasa praevia: about one case. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35 (2007) 327-329
56. Oyelese Y., Catanzarite V., Prefumo F., Lashley S., Schachter M., Tovbin Y., et al. Vasa praevia: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 103 (2006) 937
57. Dupuis O., Ruimark S., Dupont C., Thevenet S., Dittmar A., and Rudigoz R.-C. Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonic examination. Obstet gynecol 123 (2005) 193-197
58. Hidar S., Choukou A., Jerbi M., Chaïeb A., Bibi M., and Khaïri H. Clinical and sonographic diagnosis of occiput posterior position: a prospective study of 350 deliveries. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 34 (2006) 484-488
59. Sherer D., Miodovnik M., Bradley K., and Langer O. Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 13 (2003) 59-63
60. Vacca A., Keirse MJNC., Instrumental vaginal delivery. In effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, Oxford university press; 1989. p. 1216-1233.
61. Teng F.Y., and Sayre J.W. Vacuum extraction: does duration predict scalp injury?. Obstet Gynecol 89 (1997) 281-285
62. Mola G.D., Amoa A.B., and Edilyong J. Factors associated with success or failure in trials of vacuum extraction. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42 (2002) 35-39
63. Drife J.O. Choice and instrumental delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103 (1996) 608-611
64. Riethmuller D., Teffaud O., Schaal J.-P., and Maillet R. Conduite à tenir avant extraction instrumentale devant des difficultés de diagnostic de variété d'une présentation du sommet. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 27 (1998) 455-456
65. Zahalka N., Sadan O., Malinger G., Liberati M., Boaz M., Glezerman M., et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 (2005) 381-386
66. Dietz H.P., and Lanzarone V. Measuring engagement of the foetal head: validity and reproductibility of a new ultrasound technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25 (2005) 165-168
67. Sherer D.M., and Abulafia O. Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21 (2003) 430-436
68. Gyampoh B., Crouch N., O'Brien P., O'Sullivan C., and Curtner A. Intrapartum ultrasound estimation of total bladder volume. BJOG 111 (2004) 103-108
69. Rao A., Sairam S., and Shehata H. Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18 (2004) 557-576
70. Barrett J.F., and Ritchie W.K. Twin delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 16 (2002) 43-56
71. Riethmuller D., Khalife H., Schaal J.P., Maillet R., and Colette C. La grande extraction du siège sur deuxième jumeau. À propos d'une série continue de 56 cas et revue de la littérature. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 25 (1996) 94-98
72. Santolaya J., Sampson M., Abramowicz J.S., and Warsof S.L. Twin pregnancy. Ultrasonographically observed changes in fetal presentation. J Reprod Med 37 (1992) 328-330