Benefits of ultrasonography in the delivery room;Apport de l'échographie en salle de travail

Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 427-432

  Riethmuller, D ^a   Roth, P ^a   Martin, A ^a   Maillet, R ^a   Schaal, J P ^a  

^a HÔPITAL SAINT JACQUES   (France)

Author keywords

Delivery room; Labour; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

DELIVERY; DELIVERY ROOM; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OSSIFICATION; PREGNANCY; REVIEW;

EID: 2942648650     PISSN: 12979589     EISSN: 17696682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2004.02.019     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sherer DM, Onyeije CI, Bernstein PS, Kovacs P, Manning FA. Utilization of real-time ultrasound on labor and delivery in an active academic teaching hospital. Am J Perinatol 1999;16:303-7.
2. Riethmuller D, Schaal J-P. Guide de l'échographie et du Doppler obstétrical. Montpellier: Sauramps médical; 1997.
3. Dar P, Weiner I, Sofrin O, Sachs GS, Bukovsky I, Arieli S. Clinical and sonographic fetal weight estimates in active labor with ruptured membranes. J Reprod Med 2000;45:390-4.
4. e Édition. In: Schaal J-P, Riethmuller D, Maillet R, editors. Mécanique et Techniques Obstétricales. Montpellier: Sauramps Médical; 1998. p. 434-49.
5. e édition. In: Schaal J-P, Riethmuller D, Maillet R, editors. Mécanique et Techniques Obstétricales. Montpellier: Sauramps Médical; 1998. p. 411-22.
6. Riethmuller D, Teffaud O, Schaal J-P, Maillet R. Conduite à tenir avant extraction instrumentale devant des difficultés de diagnostic de variété d'une présentation du sommet : intérêt de l'échographie. J Gynécol Obstét Biol Reprod 1998;27:455-6.
7. Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:437-40.
8. Souka AP, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A. Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;13:59-63.
9. Sherer DM, Abulafia O. Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:430-6.
10. Rojansky N, Tanos V, Lewin A, Weinstein D. Sonographic evaluation of fetal head extension and maternal pelvis in cases of breech presentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73:607-11.
11. CNGOF. Rupture prématurée des membranes. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Paris: Vigot; 2000. p. 341-5.
12. Santolaya J, Sampson M, Abramowicz JS, Warsof SL. Twin pregnancy. Ultrasonographically observed changes in fetal presentation. J Reprod Med 1992;37:328-30.
13. Barrett JF, Ritchie WK. Twin delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002;16:43-56.
14. e jumeau. À propos d'une série continue de 56 cas et revue de la littérature. J Gynécol Obstét Biol Reprod 1996;25:94-8.
15. Blickstein I, Goldman RD, Kupferminc M. Delivery of breech first twins: a multicenter retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:37-42.
16. CNGOF. Césarienne : conséquences et indications. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Paris: Vigot; 2001. p. 273-8.
17. Uchino K. Prediction of dystocia by entanglement (impaction) in vertex-vertex type twin delivery. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;19:417-25.
18. Chervenak FA, Johnson RE, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. Intrapartum external version of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:160-5.