Fruits and vegetables: Technical recommendations versus social constructs;Frutas, legumes e verduras: Recomendações técnicas versus constructos sociais

Revista de Nutricao

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 669-680

  Gomes, Fabio Da Silva ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CÂNCER   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Culture; Nutrition programmes and policies; Risk; Sociology; Vegetables

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EATING HABIT; FOOD INTAKE; FRUIT; GENERAL ASPECTS OF DISEASE; HEALTH; LONGEVITY; NUTRIENT; POLICY; REVIEW; RISK; TASTE; VEGETABLE;

EID: 40849124134     PISSN: 14155273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1415-52732007000600009     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. World Health Organization. Resolution WHA57.17. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Proceedings of the 57th World Health Assembly; 2004 22 May. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
2. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2003. Shaping the future. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
3. World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Geneva: WHO; 1990.
4. Lock K, Pomerleau J, Causer L, Altmann DR, McKee M. The global burden of disease attributable to low consumption of fruit and vegetables: implications for the global strategy on diet. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 83(2):100-8.
5. World Health Organization. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Expert Report on Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization/Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; 2003. WHO Technical Report Series 916.
6. Vainio H, Bianchini F. IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention: fruit and vegetables. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003.
7. Renn O. Concepts of risk: a classification. In: Krimsky S, Golding D, editors. Social theories of risk. London: Praeger; 1992.
8. Giddens A. The Consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990.
9. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and culture. An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1982.
10. Wildavsky A. Public policy. In: Davis B, editor. The genetic revolution: scientific prospects and public perceptions. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press; 1991.
11. Freire P. Pedagogia do oprimido. São Paulo: Paz e Terra; 1993.
12. Mezirow J. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1991.
13. Kriflik LS, Yeatman H. Food scares and sustainability: a consumer perspective. Health Risk Soc. 2005; 7(1):11-24.
14. Frewer LJ, Howard C, Hedderley D, Shepherd R. What determines trust in information about food related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Anal. 1996; 16(4):473-86.
15. Frewer LJ, Miles S. Temporal stability of the psychological determinants of trust: Implications for communication about food risks. Health Risk Soc. 2003; 5(3):259-71.
16. Smith AP, Young JA, Gibson J. Consumer information and BSE: credibility and edibility. Risk Decis Policy. 1997; 2(1):41-51.
17. Gutteling JM, Wiegman O. The source of risk messages. In: Gutteling JM, Wiegman O, editors. Exploring risk communication. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.
18. Peters RG, Covello VT, McCallum DB. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Anal. 1997; 17(1):43-54.
19. Renn O, Levine D. Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson RE, Stallen PJM, editors. Communicating risks to the public. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991.
20. Johnson B. Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust. J Risk Res. 1999; 2(4):325-54.
21. Veríssimo LF. A mesa voadora. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva; 2001.
22. Elias N. O processo civilizador 1: uma história dos costumes. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar; 1994.
23. Frank A. For a sociology of the body: an analytical review. In: Featherstone M, Hepworth M, Turner BS, editors. The body social process and cultural theory. London: Sage; 1992.
24. Halkier B. Risk and food: environmental concerns and consumer practices. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2001; 36(5):801-12.
25. Foucault M. The History of Sexuality. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1978.
26. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption becomes a global priority [cited 2006 Mar 27]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/english/newsroom/focus/2003/fruitveg1.htm
27. World Cancer Research Fund. American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington (DC): American Institute for Cancer Research; 1997.
28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National 5 A Day Partnership Plan 2001-2004. Atlanta: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2002.
29. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: a plan for investment. A plan for reform. London: The Stationery Office; 2000.
30. Kuhn TS. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 5a. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva; 1993.
31. Giddens A. In Defence of sociology: essays, interpretations, and rejoinders. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1996.
32. Boyer P. Tradition as truth and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
33. Weber M. Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1978.
34. Valla VV. Procurando compreender a fala das classes populares. In: Valla VV, organizador. Saúde e Educação. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A; 2000.
35. Peregrino M. Picada, beco, vielas: caminhos do saber [dissertaç ão]. Niterói: Universidade Federal Fluminense; 1995.
36. Cunha MB. Parque proletário, grotão e outras moradas: saber e história nas favelas da Penha [dissertação]. Niterói: Universidade Federal Fluminense; 1995.
37. Gomes FS. Segurança alimentar e nutricional. In: Gomes FS, organizador. Culinária social. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Victus; 2004.
38. Castro J. Geografia da fome. Rio de Janeiro: Cruzeiro; 1946.
39. Valente FLS. Do combate à fome à segurança alimentar e nutricional: o direito à alimentação adequada. In: Valente FLS, editor. Direito humano à alimentação: desafios e conquistas. São Paulo: Cortez; 2002.
40. Garcia RWD. Reflexos da globalização na cultura alimentar: considerações sobre as mudanças na alimentação urbana. Rev Nutr. 2003; 16(4):483-92.
41. Bruno M. Crescimento econômico, mudanças estruturais e distribuição, as transformações do regime de acumulação no Brasil - uma análise regulacionista [tese]. Paris e Rio de Janeiro: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales e Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 2002.
42. García M, Fernández E, Borràs JM, Nieto FJ, Schiaffino A, Peris M, et al. Cancer risk perceptions in an urban Mediterranean population. Int J Cancer. 2005; 117(1):132-6.
43. Williams PRD, Hammitt JK. Perceived risk of conventional and organic produce: pesticides, pathogens and natural toxins. Risk Anal. 2001; 21(2):319-30.
44. Nyland LG. Risk Perception in Brazil and Sweden. RHIZIKON: risk research report No. 15. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics; 1993.
45. Bronfman NC, Cifuentes LA. Risk perception in a developing country: the case of Chile. Risk Anal. 2003; 23(6):1271-85.
46. Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Diretoria de alimentos e toxicologia. Gerência geral de toxicologia. Controlando os agrotóxicos nos alimentos. Relatório de Atividades 2001-2004. Brasília: Anvisa; 2005.
47. Low F, Lin HM, Gerrard JA, Cressey PJ, Shaw IC. Ranking the risk of pesticide dietary intake. Pest Manag Sci. 2004; 60(9):842-8.
48. Nóbrega AW. Um esforço para garantir a segurança alimentar nacional: o programa de análise de resíduos de agrotóxicos - PARA. In: Peres F, Moreira JC, organizadores. É veneno ou é remédio: agrotóxicos, saúde e ambiente. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 2003.
49. Baudrillard J. Le Systéme des objets: la consommation des signes. Paris: Denoel/Gonthier; 1968.
50. Baudrillard J. Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e); 1983.
51. Gomes FS, Azeredo RR, Ramos RG, Gugelmin SA. Saucepan Revelry: Nourishing Citizenship. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Local and Regional Health Programmes; 2004 Oct; Canada, Québec; 2004. Abstract 165. Available from: http://archives.colloquequebec2004.com/Detail.aspx?lang= EN&actNo=308
52. Draper A, Green J. Food safety and consumers: constructions of choice and risk. Social Policy Adm. 2002; 36(6):610-25.