Urodynamic Measures Do Not Predict Stress Continence Outcomes After Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Selected Women

Journal of Urology

Volumn 179, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1470-1474

  Nager, Charles W ^a,f   FitzGerald, MaryPat ^b,f   Kraus, Stephen R ^c,f   Chai, Toby C ^e,f   Zyczynski, Halina ^f,g   Sirls, Larry ^f,h   Lemack, Gary E ^d,f   Lloyd, L Keith ^f,i   Litman, Heather J ^f,j   Stoddard, Anne M ^f,j   Baker, Jan ^f,k   Steers, William ^f,l  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^h Beaumont Hospital Medical Center   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^j NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

stress; surgery; urinary bladder; urinary incontinence; urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER CAPACITY; BURCH TECHNIQUE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOMETRY; DETRUSOR DYSSYNERGIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PUBOVAGINAL SLING; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHRA; URETHRA PRESSURE; URODYNAMICS; UROFLOWMETRY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; PROGNOSIS; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 40849115957     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.077     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rortveit G., Daltveit A.K., Hannestad Y.S., and Hunskaar S. Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348 (2003) 900
2. Duggan P.M., Wilson P.D., Norton P., Brown A.D., Drutz H.P., and Herbison P. Utilization of preoperative urodynamic investigations by gynecologists who frequently operate for female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14 (2003) 282
3. Lemack G.E. Urodynamic assessment of patients with stress incontinence: how effective are urethral pressure profilometry and abdominal leak point pressures at case selection and predicting outcome?. Curr Opin Urol 14 (2004) 307
4. Jensen J.K., Nielsen Jr. F.R., and Ostergard D.R. The role of patient history in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 83 (1994) 904
5. Cardozo L.D., and Stanton S.L. Genuine stress incontinence and detrusor instability-a review of 200 patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 87 (1980) 184
6. Wagner T.H., and Hu T.W. Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995. Urology 51 (1998) 355
7. Tennstedt S. Design of the Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy Trial (SISTEr). Urology 66 (2005) 1213
8. Albo M.E., Richter H.E., Brubaker L., Norton P., Kraus S.R., Zimmern P.E., et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 356 (2007) 2143
9. Herzog A.R., Diokno A.C., and Fultz N.H. Urinary incontinence: medical and psychosocial aspects. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr 9 (1989) 74
10. Bump R.C., Mattiasson A., Bo K., Brubaker L.P., DeLancey J.O., Klarskov P., et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 (1996) 10
11. Nager C.W., Albo M.E., Fitzgerald M.P., McDermott S.M., Kraus S., Richter H.E., et al. Process for development of multicenter urodynamic studies. Urology 69 (2007) 63
12. Schafer W., Abrams P., Liao L., Mattiasson A., Pesce F., Spangberg A., et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21 (2002) 261
13. Nager C.W., Albo M.E., Fitzgerald M.P., McDermott S., Wruck L., Kraus S., et al. Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 26 (2007) 333
14. Yalcin I., Versi E., Benson J.T., Schafer W., and Bump R.C. Validation of a clinical algorithm to diagnose stress urinary incontinence for large studies. J Urol 171 (2004) 2321
15. Colombo M., Zanetta G., Vitobello D., and Milani R. The Burch colposuspension for women with and without detrusor overactivity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103 (1996) 255
16. Duckett J.R., and Tamilselvi A. Effect of tension-free vaginal tape in women with a urodynamic diagnosis of idiopathic detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence. BJOG 113 (2006) 30
17. Rodriguez L.V., de Almeida F., Dorey F., and Raz S. Does Valsalva leak point pressure predict outcome after the distal urethral polypropylene sling?. Role of urodynamics in the sling era. J Urol 172 (2004) 210
18. Bai S.W., Park J.H., Kim S.K., and Park K.H. Analysis of the success rates of Burch colposuspension in relation to Valsalva leak-point pressure. J Reprod Med 50 (2005) 189
19. Hsieh G.C., Klutke J.J., and Kobak W.H. Low valsalva leak-point pressure and success of retropubic urethropexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12 (2001) 46
20. O'Connor R.C., Nanigian D.K., Lyon M.B., Ellison L.M., Bales G.T., and Stone A.R. Early outcomes of mid-urethral slings for female stress urinary incontinence stratified by valsalva leak point pressure. Neurourol Urodyn 25 (2006) 685