Process for Development of Multicenter Urodynamic Studies

Urology

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 63-67

  Nager, Charles W ^a   Albo, Michael E ^a   FitzGerald, Mary P ^b   McDermott, Susan M ^c   Kraus, Stephen ^d   Richter, Holly E ^e   Zimmern, Philippe ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLADDER CAPACITY; BLADDER COMPLIANCE; CALIBRATION; CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EQUIPMENT; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL DETECTION; STANDARDIZATION; STRESS INCONTINENCE; URINE INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MULTICENTER STUDIES; QUALITY CONTROL; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 33846527269     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1118     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Vereecken R.L. A critical view on the value of urodynamics in non-neurogenic incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11 (2000) 188-195
2. Abrams P., Cardozo L., Fall M., et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187 (2002) 116-126
3. Schaefer W., de la Rosette J.J.M.C.H., Hofner K., et al. The ICS-BPH study: pressure flow studies, quality control and initial analysis. Neurourol Urodyn 13 (1994) 491-492
4. Lewis P., and Abrams P. Urodynamic protocol and central review of data for clinical trials in lower urinary tract dysfunction. BJU Int 85 suppl 1 (2000) 20-30
5. Lewis P., and Abrams P. Urodynamic interpretation: guidance not guesswork (1998) Presented at the 28th Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society, Jerusalem
6. Tammela T.L., Schafer W., Barrett D.M., et al., Finasteride Urodynamics Study Group. Repeated pressure-flow studies in the evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic enlargement. Neurourol Urodyn 18 (1999) 17-24
7. Schafer W., Abrams P., Liao L., et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21 (2002) 261-274
8. Bump R.C., Mattiasson A., Bo K., et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 (1996) 10-17
9. Griffiths D., Hofner K., van Mastrigt R., et al., International Continence Society Subcommittee on Standardization of Terminology of Pressure-Flow Studies. Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstruction. Neurourol Urodyn 16 (1997) 1-18
10. van Waalwijk, van Doorn E., Anders K., Khullar V., et al. Standardisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: report of the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society for Ambulatory Urodynamic Studies. Neurourol Urodyn 19 (2000) 113-125
11. Sriram R., Ojha H., and Farrar D.J. An audit of urodynamic standardization in the West Midlands, UK. BJU Int 90 (2002) 537-539
12. Sullivan J., Lewis P., Howell S., et al. Quality control in urodynamics: a review of urodynamic traces from one centre. BJU Int 91 (2003) 201-207
13. Chou T.P., Gorton E., Stanton S.L., et al. Can uroflowmetry patterns in women be reliably interpreted?. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11 (2000) 142-147
14. van de Beek C., Stoevelaar H.J., McDonnell J., et al. Interpretation of uroflowmetry curves by urologists. J Urol 157 (1997) 164-168