Effects of spectral entanglement in polarization-entanglement swapping and type-I fusion gates

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Humble, Travis S ^a   Grice, Warren P ^a  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; LIGHT POLARIZATION; PROBABILITY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

BELL-STATE MEASUREMENT; ENTANGLEMENT SWAPPING; PARAMETRIC DOWN-CONVERSION; SPECTRAL ENTANGLEMENT;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 40849083581     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.022312     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. P. G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, A. V. Sergienko, and Y. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4337 75, 4337 (1995);
2. P. G. Kwiat, E. Waks, A. G. White, I. Appelbaum, and P. H. Eberhard, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.R773 60, R773 (1999).
3. T. S. Humble and W. P. Grice, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022307 75, 022307 (2007).
4. C. K. Law, I. A. Walmsley, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5304 84, 5304 (2000).
5. W. P. Grice, A. B. U'Ren, and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.063815 64, 063815 (2001).
6. C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127903 92, 127903 (2004).
7. A. B. U'Ren, K. Banaszek, and I. A. Walmsley, Quantum Inf. Comput. QICUAW 1533-7146 3, 480 (2003).
8. J. P. Torres, M. W. Mitchell, and M. Hendrych, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.022320 71, 022320 (2005).
9. Y.-H. Kim and W. P. Grice, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.062305 68, 062305 (2003).
10. D. Branning, W. P. Grice, R. Erdmann, and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.955 83, 955 (1999).
11. V. Giovannetti, L. Maccone, J. H. Shapiro, and F. N. C. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.183602 88, 183602 (2002).
12. A. B. U'Ren, R. K. Erdmann, M. de la Cruz-Gutierrez, and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.223602 97, 223602 (2006).
13. S. Carrasco, A. Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, M. C. Teich, J. P. Torres, and L. Torner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.063802 73, 063802 (2006).
14. P. G. Kwiat, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/095003497152438 44, 2173 (1997).
15. J. T. Barreiro, N. K. Langford, N. A. Peters, and P. G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.260501 95, 260501 (2005).
16. P. G. Kwiat and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.R2623 58, R2623 (1998).
17. T.-C. Wei, J. T. Barreiro, and P. G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.060305 75, 060305 (R) (2007).
18. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895 70, 1895 (1993).
19. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35051009 409, 46 (2001).
20. W. Dür, H.-J. Briegel, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.169 59, 169 (1999).
21. D. E. Browne and T. Rudolph, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.010501 95, 010501 (2005).
22. T. B. Pittman, B. C. Jacobs, and J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 64, 062311 (2001);
23. T. B. Pittman, B. C. Jacobs, and J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257902 88, 257902 (2002).
24. H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.910 86, 910 (2001).
25. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188 86, 5188 (2001).
26. W. P. Grice and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.1627 56, 1627 (1997).
27. Y. Nambu, K. Usami, Y. Tsuda, K. Matsumoto, and K. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.033816 66, 033816 (2002).
28. S. Parker, S. Bose, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.032305 61, 032305 (2000).
29. R. Erdmann, D. Branning, W. Grice, and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.053810 62, 053810 (2000).
30. R. Grobe, K. Rzazewski, and J. H. Eberly, J. Phys. B JPAPEH 0953-4075 10.1088/0953-4075/27/16/001 27, L503 (1995).
31. The Schmidt decomposition of the bivariate Gaussian is obtained by using the substitutions tanh φ=2t in Mehler's formula (1-4 t2) -1 2 exp [{4xyt-4 t2 (x2 + y2) } (1-4 t2)] = n=0 Hn (x) Hn (y) tn n!. The latter can be found in P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach, Method of Theoretical Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953).
32. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80. 2245 80, 2245 (1998).
33. S. L. Braunstein and A. Mann, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.R1727 51, R1727 (1995).
34. P. P. Rohde and T. C. Ralph, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/09500340600578369 53, 1589 (2006).
35. Coincidences between detectors (h2, h3) and (v2, v3), or the two-photon detection events given by (h2, h2), (h3, h3), (v2, v2), and (v3, v3), do not lead to an entangled state for photons 1 and 4. Modeling these two-photon detection events requires introduction of a factor of 1 2 into the definition of the projection operator to ensure idempotency.
36. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306 61, 052306 (2000).
37. C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2046 53, 2046 (1996).