Analysis and interpretation of high transverse entanglement in optical parametric down conversion

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 12, 2004, Pages

  Law, C K ^a   Eberly, J H ^b  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PHOTONS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; VECTORS; WAVE EQUATIONS;

OPTICAL PARAMETRIC DOWN CONVERSION; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT; SCHMIDT DECOMPOSITION METHOD; TRANSVERSE WAVE VECTORS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 2342652778     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127903     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 50 (1988); Y. H. Shih and C. O. Alley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2921 (1988).
2. Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 50 (1988); Y. H. Shih and C. O. Alley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2921 (1988).
3. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998).
4. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998).
5. J. C. Howell et al., quant-ph/0309122.
6. H. Huang and J.H. Eberly, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 915 (1993).
7. C. K. Law, I. A. Walmsley, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5304 (2000); W. P. Grice, A. B. U'Ren, and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. A 64, 063815 (2001).
8. C. K. Law, I. A. Walmsley, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5304 (2000); W. P. Grice, A. B. U'Ren, and I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. A 64, 063815 (2001).
9. P. G. Kwiat, A. M. Steinberg, and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 47, R2472 (1993); J. Brendel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2594 (1999).
10. P. G. Kwiat, A. M. Steinberg, and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 47, R2472 (1993); J. Brendel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2594 (1999).
11. J. G. Rarity and P. R. Tapster, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2495 (1990).
12. A. Mair et al., Nature (London) 412, 313 (2001).
13. S. Franke-Arnold et al., Phys. Rev. A 65, 033823 (2002).
14. H. H. Arnaut and G. A. Barbosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5209 (2001).
15. P. G. Kwiat, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2173 (1997); M. Atature et al., Phys. Rev. A 65, 023808 (2002).
16. P. G. Kwiat, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2173 (1997); M. Atature et al., Phys. Rev. A 65, 023808 (2002).
17. D. N. Klyshko, JETP Lett. 6, 23 (1967).
18. J. P. Torres et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 052313 (2003); G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres, and L. Torner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 013601 (2002); J. P. Torres, A. Alexandrescu, and L. Torner, Phys. Rev. A 68, 050301 (2003).
19. J. P. Torres et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 052313 (2003); G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres, and L. Torner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 013601 (2002); J. P. Torres, A. Alexandrescu, and L. Torner, Phys. Rev. A 68, 050301 (2003).
20. J. P. Torres et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 052313 (2003); G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres, and L. Torner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 013601 (2002); J. P. Torres, A. Alexandrescu, and L. Torner, Phys. Rev. A 68, 050301 (2003).
21. A. Gatti, E. Brambilla, and L. A. Lugiato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 133603 (2003); A. F. Abouraddy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 123602 (2001).
22. A. Gatti, E. Brambilla, and L. A. Lugiato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 133603 (2003); A. F. Abouraddy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 123602 (2001).
23. R. S. Bennink, S. J. Bentley, and R. W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 113601 (2002).
24. See A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1995); A. Ekert and P. L. Knight, Am. J. Phys. 63, 415 (1995).
25. See A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1995); A. Ekert and P. L. Knight, Am. J. Phys. 63, 415 (1995).
26. M. H. Rubin, Phys. Rev. A 54, 5349 (1996).
27. C. H. Monken, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, and S. Padua, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3123 (1998); S. P. Walborn, A. N. de Oliveira, and C. H. Monken, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 143601 (2003).
28. C. H. Monken, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, and S. Padua, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3123 (1998); S. P. Walborn, A. N. de Oliveira, and C. H. Monken, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 143601 (2003).
29. See R. Grobe, K. Rza̧żewski and J. H. Eberly, J. Phys. B 27, L503 (1994). A disentangled (product) state corresponds to K = 1. Bell states of two-photon polarization have K = 2. Two-particle states in continuous Hilbert spaces can comprise a large number of Schmidt modes and have very large K values.
30. G. Giedke et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 107901 (2003).
31. p is the longitudinal wave vector of the pump field inside the crystal. These matching conditions could be achievable in BBO crystals at suitable pump frequencies and polarization.
32. M. V. Fedorov et al., quant-ph/0312119.
33. A. V. Rau, J. A. Dunningham, and K. Burnett, Science 301, 1081 (2003).