Effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic brackets: A controlled clinical trial

Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 43-48

  Sunna, S ^a   Rock, W P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bracket bonding; Sandblasting

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; DENTAL ALLOY; RELY A BOND SYSTEM; RESIN CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADOLESCENT; ALUMINUM OXIDE; BICUSPID; CHILD; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; CUSPID; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 40749126461     PISSN: 14653125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/146531207225022410     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Newman GV. Bonding plastic orthodontic attachments to tooth enamel. J NJ State Dent Soc 1964; 35: 346-58.
2. Keizer S, Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1976; 69: 318-27.
3. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975; 2: 171-78.
4. Rock WP, Abdullah MS. Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light cured orthodontic adhesives. J Dent 1997; 25: 243-49.
5. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreated. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1984; 85: 333-40.
6. Millett D, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 117-22.
7. MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 113: 276-81.
8. Johnston CD, McSherry PF. The effects of sandblasting on the bond strength of molar attachments - an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 311-17.
9. Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod 1998; 25: 283-87.
10. Gorelick, L. Bonding metal brackets with a self-polymerizing sealant-composite: a 12-month assessment. Am J Orthod 1977; 71: 542-53.
11. Wong M, Power S. A prospective randomized clinical trial to compare pre-coated and non-pre-coated brackets. J Orthod 2003; 30: 155-58.
12. O'Brien KD, Read MJ, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 95: 348-51.
13. Sonis, AL. Comparison of a light-cured adhesive with an autopolymerizing bonding system. J Clin Orthod 1988; 22: 730-32.
14. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991, 458-59.
15. Maijer R, Smith DC. Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases. Am J Orthod 1981; 79: 20-34.
16. Wood DP, Paleczny GJ, Johnson LN. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic bands. Angle Orthod 1996; 3: 207-14.