A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds
Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;94:476-83.
In vivo bracket retention comparison of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based bracket adhesive system after a year
DOI 10.1067/mod.2002.122367
Hegarty DJ, Macfarlane TV. In vivo bracket retention comparison of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resinbased bracket adhesive after a year. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002;121:496-501. (Pubitemid 40433050)
A visible light-activated direct bonding material: An in vivo comparative study
O'Brien KD, Read MJF, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989;95:348-51.
Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives
Zachrisson BU, Brobakken BO. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1978;74:62-78. (Pubitemid 8398640)
A clinical trial of a light activated bonding material over an 18 month period
Lovius BB, Pender N, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light activated bonding material over an 18 month period. Br J Orthod 1987;14:11-20.