Ecology of alien species with special reference to stream salmonids

Boreal Environment Research

Volumn 13, Issue SUPPL. A, 2008, Pages 43-52

  Korsu, Kai ^a   Huusko, Ari ^b   Muotka, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIA; ARANEAE; AVES; HEXAPODA; MAMMALIA; PISCES; REPTILIA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 40749120328     PISSN: 12396095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (95)

1. Allendorf F.W. & Lundquist L.L. 2003. Introduction: population biology, evolution, and control of invasive species. Conserv. Biol. 17: 24-30.
2. Avenetti L.D., Robinson A.T. & Cantrell C.J. 2006. Short-term effectiveness of constructed barriers at protecting Apache trout. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 26: 213-216.
3. Baxter C.V., Fausch K.D., Murakami M. & Chapman P.L. 2004. Fish invasion restructures stream and forest food webs by interrupting reciprocal prey subsidies. Ecology 85: 2656-2663.
4. Bozek M.A. & Hubert W.A. 1992. Segregation of resident trout in streams as predicted by three habitat dimensions. Can. J. Zool. 70: 886-890.
5. Cadotte M.W., Murray B.R. & Lowett-Doust J. 2006. Ecological patterns and biological invasions: using regional species inventories in macroecology. Biol. Invasions 8: 809-821.
6. Cambray J.A. 2003. Impact on indigenous species biodiversity caused by the globalization of alien recreational freshwater fisheries. Hydrobiologia 500: 217-230.
7. Closs G.P. & Lake P.S. 1996. Drought, differential mortality and the coexistence of a native and introduced fish species in southeast Australian intermittent stream. Environ. Biol. Fishes 47: 17-26.
8. Colautti R.I. 2005. Are characteristics of introduced salmonid fishes biased by propagule pressure? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62: 950-959.
9. Colautti R.I., Grigorovich I.A. & MacIsaac H.J. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 8: 1023-1037.
10. Copp G.H., Garthwaite R. & Gozlan R.E. 2005. Risk identification and assessment of non-native freshwater fishes: a summary of consepts and perspectives on protocols for the UK. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 21: 371-373.
11. Cox J.G. & Lima S.L. 2006. Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dictomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 674-680.
12. Crait J.R. & Ben-David M. 2006. River otters in Yellowstone lake depend on a declining cutthroat trout population. J. Mammal. 87: 485-494.
13. Crooks J.A. 2005. Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 12: 316-329.
14. Davis M.A. 2003. Biotic globalization: Does competition from introduced species threaten biodiversity. BioScience 53: 481-489.
15. De la Hoz Franco E.A. & Budy P. 2005: Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the distribution of trout and salmon along a longitudinal stream gradient. Environ. Biol. Fishes 72: 379-391.
16. DeWald L. & Wilzbach M.A. 1992. Interactions between native brook trout and hatchery brown trout: effects on habitat use, feeding, and growth. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 121:287-296.
17. Didham R.K., Tylianakis J.M., Hutchison M.A., Ewers R.M. & Gemmell N.J. 2005. Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 470-474.
18. Dunham J.B., Pilliod D.S. & Young M.K. 2004. Assessing the consequences of nonnative trout in headwater ecosystems in western North America. Fisheries 29:18-25.
19. Dunham J.B., Adams S.B., Schroeter R.E. & Novinger D.C. 2002. Alien invasions in aquatic ecosystems: Toward an understanding of brook trout invasions and potential impacts on inland cutthroat trout in western North America. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 12: 373-391.
20. Elton C.S. 1958. The ecology of invasions of plants and animals. Methuen, London.
21. Fausch K.D. 1984. Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Can. J. Zool. 62: 441-451.
22. Fausch K.D. 1988. Test of competition between native and introduced salmonids in streams: what have we learned? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci 45: 2238-2246.
23. Fausch K.D. 1998. Interspecific competition and juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): on testing effects and evaluating evidence across scales. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55 (Suppl. 1): 218-231.
24. Fausch K.D., Taniguchi Y., Nakano S., Grossman G.D. & Townsend C.R. 2001. Flood disturbance regimes influence rainbow trout invasion success among five holartic regions. Ecol. Appl. 11: 1438-1455.
25. Finlayson B., Somer W., Duffield D., Propst D., Mellison C., Pettengill T., Sexauer H., Nesler T., Gurtin S., Elliot J., Partridge F. & Skaar D. 2005. Native inland trout restoration on national forests in the western United States: time for improvement? Fisheries 30: 10-19.
26. Fitzpatrick M.C., Weltzin J.F., Sanders N.J. & Dunn R.D. 2007. The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range. Global Ecol. Biogeo. 16: 24-33.
27. García-Berthou E., Alcaraz C., Pou-Rovira Q., Zamora L., Coenders G. & Feo C. 2005. Introduction pathways and establishment rates of invasive aquatic species in Europe. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62: 453-463.
28. Grant G.C., Vondracek B. & Sorensen P.W. 2002. Spawning interactions between sympatric brown and brook trout may contribute to species replacement. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 131:569-576.
29. Gurevitch J. & Padilla D.K. 2004. Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 470-474.
30. Heger T. & Trepl L. 2003. Predicting biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 5: 313-321.
31. Herbold P. & Moyle P.B. 1986. Introduced species and vacant niches. Am. Nat. 128: 751-760.
32. Hierro J.L., Maron J.L. & Callaway R.M. 2004. A biogeo-graphical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J. Ecol. 93: 5-15.
33. Hierro J.L., Villarreal D., Eren Ö., Graham J.M. & Callaway R.M. 2006. Disturbance facilitates invasion: the effects are stronger aboard than at home. Am. Nat. 168: 144-156.
34. Holčik J. 1991. Fish introductions in Europe with particular reference to its central and eastern part. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48 (Suppl. 1): 13-23.
35. Jeschke J.M. & Strayer D.L. 2005. Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 7198-7202.
36. Kennard M.J., Arthington A.H., Pusey B.J. & Harch B.D. 2005. Are alien fish a reliable indicator of river health? Freshwater Biol. 50: 174-193.
37. Knapp R.A. & Matthews K.R. 2000. Non-native fish introductions and the decline of the mountain yellow-legged frog from within protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 14: 428-438.
38. Kocovsky P.M. & Carline R.F. 2005. Stream pH as an abiotic gradient influencing distributions of trout in Pennsylvania streams. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 134: 1299-1312.
39. Koel T.M., Bigelow P.E., Doepke P.D., Ertel B.D. & Mahony D.L. 2005. Normative lake trout result in Yellowstone cutthroat trout decline and impacts to bears and anglers. Fisheries 30: 10-19.
40. Kolar C.S. & Lodge D.M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199-204.
41. Kolar C.S. & Lodge D.M. 2002. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298: 1233-1236.
42. Korsu K., Huusko A. & Muotka T. 2007. Niche characteristic explain the reciprocal invasion success of stream salmonids in different continents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104: 9725-9729.
43. Krueger C.C. & May B. 1991. Ecological and genetic effects of salmonid introductions in North America. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48 (Suppl. 1): 66-77.
44. Lake P.S. 2000. Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 573-592.
45. Leprieur F., Hickey M.A., Arbuckle C.J., Closs G.P., Brosse S. & Townsend C.R. 2006. Hydrological disturbance benefits a native fish at the expense of an exotic fish. J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 930-939.
46. Levine J.M. 2000. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288: 852-854.
47. Levine J.M., Adler P.B. & Yelenik S.G. 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 7: 975-989.
48. Lockwood J.L., Cassey P. & Blackburn T. 2005. The propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 223-228.
49. Lodge D.M. 1993. Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 133-137.
50. Lowe S., Browne M., Boudjelas S. & De Poorter M. 2000. 100 of the world's worst invasive alien species. Published by Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN).
51. MacDougall A.S. & Turkington R. 2004. Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86: 42-55.
52. McDowall R.M. 2003. Impacts of introduced salmonids on native galaxiids in New Zealand upland streams: a new look at old problem. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 132: 229-238.
53. McHugh P. & Budy P. 2005. An experimental evaluation of competitive and thermal effects on brown trout (Salmo trutta) and Bonnewille cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarcii utah) performance along an altitudinal gradient. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62: 2784-2795.
54. Melbourne B.A., Cornell H.V., Davies K.F., Dugaw C.J., Elmendorf S., Freestone A.L., Hall R.J., Harrison S., Hastings A., Holland M., Holyoak M., Lambrinos J., Moore K. & Yokomizo H. 2007. Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover? Ecol. Lett. 10: 77-94.
55. Miller A.W., Hewitt C.L. & Ruiz G.M. 2002. Invasion success: does size really matter. Ecol. Lett. 5: 159-162.
56. Moore S.E., Ridley B. & Larson G.L. 1983. Standing crops of brook trout concurrent with removal of rainbow trout from selected streams in Great Smoky Mountain national park. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 3: 72-80.
57. Moyle P.B. & Light T. 1996. Biological invasions in fresh water: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biol. Cons. 78: 149-161.
58. Nakano S. 1995. Competitive interactions for foraging microhabitats in a size-structured interspecific dominance hierarchy of two sympatric stream salmonids in a natural habitat. Can. J. Zool. 73: 1845-1854.
59. Olden J.D. 2006. Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography. J. Biogeography 33: 2027-2039.
60. Olden J.D., Poff N.L. & Bestgen K.R. 2006. Life-history strategies predict fish invasions and extirpations in the Colorado River basin. Ecol. Monogr. 76: 25-40.
61. Ortubay S., Cussac V., Battini M., Barriga J., Aigo J., Alonso M., Macchi P., Reissig M., Yoshioka J. & Fox S. 2006. Is the decline of birds and amphibians in a steppe lake of northern Patagonia a consequence of limnological changes following fish introduction? Aquat. Conserv. 16: 93-105.
62. Parker I.M., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Goodell K., Wonham M., Kareiva P.M., Williamson M.H., Von Holle B., Moyle P.B., Byers J.E. & Goldwasser L. 1999. Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol. Invasions 1: 3-19.
63. Pauchard A. & Shea K. 2006. Integrating the study of non-native invasions across spatial scales. Biol. Invasions 8: 399-413.
64. Peterson A.T. & Vieglais D.A. 2001. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. BioScience 51: 363-371.
65. Peterson D.G. & Fausch K.D. 2003. Testing population-level mechanisms of invasion by a mobile vertebrate: a simple conceptual framework for salmonids in streams. Biol. Invasions 5: 239-259.
66. Rahel F.J. 2000. Homogenization of fish faunas across the United States. Science 288: 854-856.
67. Rahel F.J. 2002. Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 291-315.
68. Rahel F.J. & Nibbelink N.P. 1999. Spatial patterns in relations among brown trout (Salmo trutta) distribution, summer air temperature, and stream size in Rocky Mountain streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56 (Suppl. 1): 43-51.
69. Ricciardi A. & Atkinson S.K. 2004. Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 7: 781-784.
70. Richardson D.M., Allsopp N., D'Antonio C.M., Milton S.J. & Rejmánek M. 2000. Plant invasions - the role of mutualism. Biol. Rev. 75: 65-93.
71. Rieman B.E., Peterson J.T. & Myers D.L. 2006. Have brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) displaced bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) along longitudinal gradients in central Idaho streams? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63: 63-78.
72. Rodríguez J.P. 2001. Exotic species introductions into South America: an underestimated thread? Biodiver. Conserv. 10: 1983-1996.
73. Rose G.A. 1986. Growth decline in subyearling brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) after emergence of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 187-193.
74. Scott D. & Irvine J.R. 2000. Competitive exclusion of brown trout Salmo trutta L., by rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum, in lake tributaries, New Zealand. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 7: 225-230.
75. Scott R.J., Judge K.A., Ramster K., Noakes D.L.G. & Beamish F.W.H. 2005: Interactions between naturalized exotic salmonids and reintroduced atlantic salmon in a Lake Ontario tributary. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 14: 402-405.
76. Shea, K. & Chesson P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 170-176.
77. Simberloff D. 2006. Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol. Lett. 9: 912-919.
78. Simon K.S. & Townsend C.R. 2003. Impacts of freshwater invaders at different levels of ecological organisation, with emphasis on salmonids and ecosystem consequences. Freshwater Biol. 48: 982-994.
79. Sorensen P.W., Cardwell J.R., Essington T. & Weigel D.E. 1995. Reproductive interactions between sympatric brook and brown trout in a small Minnesota stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 1958-1965.
80. Strange E.M., Moyle P.B. & Foin T.C. 1992. Interactions between stochastic and deterministic processes in stream fish community assembly. Environ. Biol. Fishes 36: 1-15.
81. Strauss S.Y., Lau J.A. & Carroll S.P. 2006. Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol. Lett. 9: 357-374.
82. Taniguchi Y. & Nakano S. 2000. Condition-specific competition: implications for the altitudinal distribution of stream fishes. Ecology 81: 2027-2039.
83. Taniguchi Y., Fausch K.D. & Nakano S. 2002. Size-structured interactions between native and introduced species: can intraguild predation facilitate invasion by stream salmonids? Biol. Invasions 4: 223-233.
84. Townsend C.R. 2003. Individual, population, community, and ecosystem consequences of a fish invader in New Zealand streams. Conserv. Biol. 17: 38-47.
85. Volpe J.P., Anholt B.R. & Glickman B.W. 2001. Competition among juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss): relevance to invasion potential in British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 197-207.
86. Von Holle B. & Simbeloff D. 2005. Ecological resistance to biological invasions overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86: 3212-3218.
87. Vredenburg V.T. 2004. Reversing introduced species effects: Experimental removal of introduced fish leads to rapid recovery of a declining frog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:7646-7650.
88. Waters T.F. 1983. Replacement of brook trout by brown trout over 15 years in a Minnesota stream: production and abundance. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 112: 137-146.
89. Waters T.F. 1999. Long-term trout production dynamics in Valley Creek, Minnesota. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 128: 1151-1162.
90. White E.M., Wilson J.C. & Clarke A.R. 2006. Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Diversity and Distributions 12: 443-455.
91. Williamson M. 1996. Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, London.
92. Williamson M. 2006. Explaining and predicting the success of invading species at different stages of invasion. Biol. Invasions 8: 1561-1568.
93. Woodford D.J. & Impson N.D. 2004. A preliminary assessment of the impact of alien rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) on indigenous fishes of the upper Berg River, Western Cape Province, South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science 29: 107-111.
94. Young K.A. 2004. Asymmetric competition, habitat selection, and niche overlap in juvenile salmonids. Ecology 85: 134-149.
95. Zimmerman J.K.H. & Vondracek B. 2007. Brown trout and food web interactions in Minnesota stream. Freshwater Biol. 52: 123-136.