Upheaval in the moral economy of science? Patenting, teamwork and the World War II experience of penicillin

History and Technology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 173-190

  Bud, Robert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Patents; Penicillin; Team work; Vitamin D; World War II

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749116810     PISSN: 07341512     EISSN: 14772620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07341510701810955     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. American Chemical Society Are Patents on Medicinal Discoveries and on Foods in the Public Interest?. Joint Symposium Presented Before the Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Biological Chemistry and Agricultural and Food Chemistry, at the 94th Meeting of the American Chemical Society Rochester, NY pp. 1315-1326.
2. Annual Representative Meeting (1931) Medical Ethics: Ethics of Remuneration and Reward for Medical Invention. BMJ Supplement, pp. 56-61.
3. Apple, Rima (1989) Patenting University Research: Harry Steenbock.and the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. Isis, 80, pp. 375-394.
4. Asner, Glen R. (2004) The Linear Model, The U.S. Department of Defense, and the Golden Age of Industrial Research. The Science-Industry Nexus. History, Policy, Implications, Science History Publications, Sagamore Beach, MA
5. Ben-David, Joseph (1971) The Scientist's Role in Society, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
6. Berge, Wendell (1944) Cartels. Challenge to a Free World, Public Affairs Press, Washington, DC
7. Bud, Robert (1978) Strategy in American Cancer Research after World War II: A Case Study. Social Studies in Science, 8, pp. 425-459.
8. Bud, Robert (1998) Penicillin and the New Elizabethans. British Journal for the History of Science, 31, pp. 305-333.
9. Bud, Robert (2005) Antibiotics, Big Business and Consumers: The Context of Government Investigations into the Postwar American Drug Industry. Technology and Culture, 46, pp. 329-349.
10. Bud, Robert (2007) Penicillin: Triumph and Tragedy, Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. Bush, George P. and Hattery, Lowell H. (1953) Teamwork in Research, American University Press, Washington D.C.
12. Bush, George P. and Hattery, Lowell H. (1956) Teamwork and Creativity in Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, pp. 361-372.
13. Bush, Vannevar (1945) Science the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
14. Calvert, Jane (2004) The Idea of "Basic Research" in Language and Practice. Minerva, 42, pp. 251-268.
15. Calvert, Jane (2006) What's Special about Basic Research?. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 31, pp. 199-220.
16. Clark, Ronald W. (1986) The Life of Ernst Chain, Penicillin and Beyond, Palgrave Macmillan, London
17. Clarke, Beverly L. (1964) Multiple Authorship Trends in Scientific Papers. Science, 143, pp. 822-824.
18. Cohen, I. Bernard (1948) Science, Servant of Man, Little Brown, Boston
19. Cole, Stephen (2004) Merton's Contribution to the Sociology of Science. Social Studies of Science, 34, pp. 829-844.
20. (1939) Conference on Medical Patents. Journal of the American Medical Association, 113, pp. 327-336.
21. Connolly, A. G. (1937) Should Medical Inventions be Patented?. Science, 86, pp. 383-384.
22. Daston, Lorraine (1995) The Moral Economy of Science. Osiris, 10, pp. 2-24.
23. de Chadaravian, Soraya (2002) Designs for Life. Molecular Biology after World War II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
24. Price, Derek J. De Solla (1965) Little Science Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York
25. Edgerton, David (2004) "The Linear Model" Did Not Exist. The Science-Industry Nexus. History, Policy, Implications, Science History Publications, Sagamore Beach, MA
26. Eisenberg, Rebecca S. (1996) Public Research and Private Development. Patents and Technology Transfer in Government Sponsored Research. Virginia Law Review, 82, pp. 1663-1727.
27. Etzkowitz, Henry (1994) Knowledge as Property: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Debate over Academic Patent Policy. Minerva, 32, pp. 383-421.
28. Federal Trade Commission (1958) Economic Report on Antibiotics Manufacture, US Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.
29. Fishbein, Morris (1937) Medical Patents. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 29, pp. 1315-1318.
30. Forman, P. (1997) Recent Science: Late-modern and Post-modern. The Historiography of Contemporary Science and Technology, Harwood Academic, Amsterdam
31. Fuller, Steven (2001) Thomas Kuhn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
32. Galison, Peter (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
33. Gibbons, Michael, Limoges, Camille, Nowotny, Helga, Schwartzman, Simon, Scott, Peter and Trow, Martin (1994) The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, London
34. Gustorn, David H. (1997) Critical Appraisal in Science and Technology Policy Analysis: The Example of Science, the Endless Frontier. Policy Sciences, 30, pp. 233-255.
35. Hagstrom, Warren O. (1965) The Scientific Community, Basic Books, New York
36. Hancher, L. (1990) Regulating for Competition: Law and the Pharmaceutical Industry in the United Kingdom and France, Oxford University Press, Oxford
37. Hollinger, David (1995) Science as a Weapon in Kulturkämpfe in the United States during and after World War II. Isis, 86, pp. 440-454.
38. Hounshell, David A. (2001) Rethinking the Cold War; Rethinking Science and Technology in the Cold War; Rethinking the Social Study of Science and Technology. Social Studies of Science, 31, pp. 289-297.
39. Hounshell, David A. (2004) Industrial Research. Commentary. The Science-Industry Nexus. History, Policy, Implications, Science History Publications, Sagamore Beach, MA
40. Hounshell, David A. and Smith Jr., John Kenly (1988) Science and Corporate Strategy: DuPont R&D, 1902-1980, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
41. Hughes, Jeff (2004) The History of Science, The Public, and the "Problem" of Policy. Some Reflections from the United Kingdom. The Science-Industry Nexus. History, Policy, Implications, Science History Publications, Sagamore Beach, MA
42. Jaffe, Adam B. and Lerner, Josh (2001) Reinventing Public R&D: Patent Policy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies. Rand Journal of Economics, 32, pp. 167-198.
43. Kaempffert, Waldemar (1948) On Great Discoveries and What Precedes Them. New York Times
44. Kevles, Daniel J. (1978) The Physicists. The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America, Knopf, New York
45. Kevles, Daniel J. and Hood, Leroy (1992) The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
46. Kline, R. (1995) Constructing Technology as Applied Science: Public Rhetoric of Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 1880-1945. Isis, 86, pp. 194-221.
47. Kohler, Robert (1994) Lords of the Fly, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.
48. Krige, John (2001) The 1984 Nobel Physics Prize for Heterogeneous Engineering. Minerva, 39, pp. 425-444.
49. Lancet (1950) Penicillin and Modern Research. Lancet, 1, pp. 76-77.
50. Magnus, David, Caplan, Arthur L. and McGee, Glenn (2002) Who Owns Life?, Prometheus Books, Amherst, Mass.
51. McCray, W. Patrick (2000) Large Telescopes and the Moral Economy of Recent Science. Social Studies of Science, 30, pp. 685-711.
52. McKusick, Vincent Lee (1948) A Study of Patent Policies in Educational Institutions, Giving Specific Attention to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 245, p. 1932.
53. Merton, Robert K. (1973) The Normative Structure of Science. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, pp. 267-278. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.
54. Morrell, Jack (1997) Science at Oxford 1914-1939. Transforming an Arts University, Clarendon Press, Oxford
55. Mowery, David C., Nelson, Richard R., Sampat, Bhaven N. and Ziedonis, Arvids A. (2003) Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation, University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States, Stamford University Press, Palo Alto, Calif.
56. Mowery, David C. and Sampat, Bhaven N. (2001) University Patents, Patent Policies, and Patent Policy Debates, 1925-1980. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, pp. 781-814.
57. Neushul, Peter (1993) Science, Government and the Mass Production of Penicillin. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 48, pp. 371-395.
58. Nowotny, Helga, Scott, Peter and Gibbons, Michael (2001) Rethinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity, Cambridge
59. Palmer, Archie M. (1948) Survey of University Patent Policies. Preliminary Report, National Research Council, Washington, DC
60. Perlman, David (1978) How Penicillin Research Came to the University of Wisconsin. Mortar and Quill, 15:1, pp. 5-8.
61. Pestre, Dominique (2003) Science, argent et politique, INRA, Paris
62. Pieters, Toine (2005) Interferon: The Science and Selling of a Miracle Drug, Routledge, London
63. Rasmussen, Nicholas (2002) Of "Small Men", Big Science and Bigger Business: The Second World War and Biomedical Research in the United States. Minerva, 40, pp. 115-146.
64. Rasmussen, Nicholas (2004) The Moral Economy of the Drug Company-Medical Scientist Collaboration in Interwar America. Social Studies of Science, 34, pp. 161-185.
65. (1939) Report of the Conference on Medical Patents. Held under the Auspices of the Board of Trustees of the American Medical Association, 16 March 1939,. Journal of the American Medical Association, 113, pp. 327-336.
66. Science (1933) Medical Patents. Science, 77, pp. 451-452.
67. Shairfer, Carl H. (1957) Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
68. Shapin, Steven (2004) Who is the Industrial Scientist? Commentary from Academic Sociology and from the Shop-Floor in the United States, ca. 1900-ca. 1970. The Science-Industry Nexus. History, Policy, Implications, Science History Publications, Sagamore Beach, MA
69. Shear, M. J. (1946) Teamwork in Scientific Research. Personnel Administration, 9, pp. 3-8.
70. Shinn, Terry (1999) Change or Mutation? Reflections on the Foundations of Contemporary Science. Social Science Information, 38, pp. 149-176.
71. Stokes, Donald E. (1997) Pasteur's Quadrant. Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Brookings Institute, Washington, DC
72. Swann, John P. (1983) The Search for Synthetic Penicillin during World War 2. British Journal for the History of Science, 16, pp. 154-188.
73. Swann, John P. (1988) Academic Scientists and the Pharmaceutical Industry, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
74. (1946) Treaty Series No. 4
75. Thompson, E. P. (1971) The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century. Past and Present, 50, pp. 76-136.
76. Thomson, James D. (1956) Editor's Critique. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, pp. 382-385.
77. Turchetti, Simon (2006) "For Slow Neutrons, Slow Pay": Enrico Fermi's Patent and the U.S. Atomic Energy Program, 1938-1953. Isis, 97, pp. 1-27.
78. US Department of Justice (1947) Investigation of Government Patent Practices and Policies, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
79. Wainwright, Milton (1991) Streptomycin: Discovery and Resultant Controversy. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 13, pp. 97-124.
80. Weiner, Charles (1987) Patenting and Academic Research. Historical Case Studies. Science,Technology and Human Values, 12, pp. 50-62.
81. Weingart, Peter (1997) From "Finalization" to "Mode 2". Old Wine in New Bottles. Social Science Information, 36, pp. 591-613.
82. Wells, Wyatt C. (2002) Antitrust and the Making of the Postwar World, Columbia University Press, New York
83. Ziman, John (1994) Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
84. Zimmerman, David (1996) Top Secret Exchange: The Tizard Mission and the Scientific War, A. Sutton, London