Critical appraisal in science and technology policy analysis: The example of Science, the endless frontier

Policy Sciences

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 233-255

  Guston, David H ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009089987     PISSN: 00322687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1004319423297     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alt, James E. and Kenneth A. Shepsle, eds. (1990). Perspectives on Political Economy. New York: Cambridge University.
2. Averch, Harrey A. (1985). A Strategic Analysis of Science & Technology Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
3. Blanpied, William A., ed. (1995). Impacts of the Early Cold War on the Formulation of U. S. Science Policy: Selected Memoranda of William T. Golden, October 1950-April 1951. Washington, DC: AAAS.
4. Brown, George E., Jr. (1991). 'A perspective on the federal role in science and technology,' in Margaret O. Meredith, Stephen D. Nelson, and Albert H. Teich, eds., AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook, 1991. Washington, DC: AAAS, pp. 23-33.
5. Bush, Vannevar (1960) [1945]. Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
6. Bush, Vannevar (1970). Pieces of the Action. New York: Morrow.
7. Byerly, Radford, Jr. and Roger A. Pielke, Jr. (1995). 'The changing ecology of United States science.' Science 269 (15 September): 1531-1532.
8. Calvert, Randall L. (1995). 'The rational choice theory of institutions: Implications for design,' in David. L. Weimer, ed., Institutional Design. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 63-94.
9. Clark, William C. and Giandomenico Majone (1985). 'The critical use of scientific inquiries with policy implications.' Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (3): 6-19.
10. Collingridge, David and Colin Reeve (1980). Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy making. London: Pinter.
11. Cozzens, Susan E. (1996). 'Quality of life returns from basic research,' in Bruce L. R. Smith and Claude E. Barfield, eds., Technology, R&D, and the Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and American Enterprise Institute.
12. Dahl, Robert (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University.
13. Easton, David (1957). 'An approach to the analysis of political systems.' World Politics 9 (3): 383-400.
14. England, J. Merton (1976). 'Dr. Bush writes a report.' Science 191 (9 January): 41-47.
15. England, J. Merton (1982). A Patron for Pure Science: The National Science Foundation's Formative Years. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
16. Ezrahi, Yaron (1980). 'Utopian and pragmatic rationalism: The political context of scientific advice.' Minerva 18: 111-131.
17. Fischer, Frank (1990). Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Gilmour, John B. Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
19. Guston, David H. and Harvey Brooks, organizers (1995). 'Return to the frontier: The Vannevar Bush report, then and now.' Annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Atlanta, February.
20. Guston, David H. and William C. Clark, organizers and speakers (1995). 'Where are the great works of science and technology policy analysis?' Annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Atlanta, February.
21. Guston, David H. and Kenneth Keniston, eds. (1994). The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government. Cambridge: MIT Press.
22. Hart, David (1995). Competing Conceptions of the Liberal State and the Governance of Technological Innovation in the U.S., 1933-1953. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge: MIT Department of Political Science.
23. Hodgins, Eric (1955). 'The strange state of American research,' in Fortune, eds., The Mighty Force of Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Hughes, Thomas (1989). American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusism. New York: Penguin Books.
25. Jasanoff, Sheila (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University.
26. Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1990). Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole Publishing.
27. Kevles, Daniel J. (1977). The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. New York: Knopf.
28. Kleinman, Daniel L. (1995). Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham: Duke Univesity Press.
29. Laird, Frank (1993). 'Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decisionmaking.' Science, Technology, and Human Values 18 (3): 341-361.
30. Lindblom, Charles E. (1990). Inquiry and Change: The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society. New Haven: Yale University.
31. Moe, Terry (1984). 'The new economics of organization.' American Journal of Political Science 28: 739-777.
32. Parsons, Talcott (1946). 'National science legislation.' Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 2: 7-9.
33. Patton, Michael Q., Grimes, Patricia Smith, Guthrie, Kathryn M. Brennan, Nancy J., French, Barbara Dickey, and Dale A. Blyth (1977). 'In search of impact: An analysis of the utilization of federal health evaluation research,' in Carol H. Weiss, ed., Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 141-164.
34. Ravitz, Jerome R. (1971). Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University.
36. Reingold, Nathan (1991) [1987]. 'Vannevar Bush's new deal for research; or, the triumph of the old order,' in Science, American Style. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, pp. 285-333.
37. Sapolsky, Harvey M. (1990). Science and the Navy: The History of the Office of Naval Research. Princeton: Princeton University.
38. Sarewitz, Daniel (1996). Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
39. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
40. Shapley, Deborah, and Rustum Roy (1985). Lost at the Frontier: U.S. Science and Technology Policy Adrift. Philadelphia: ISI.
41. Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Barry R. Weingast (1987). 'The institutional foundations of committee power.'American Political Science Review 81: 85-104.
42. Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Barry R. Weingast (1994). 'Positive theories of congressional institutions.' Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (2): 149-180.
43. Sigma Xi (1995). Vannevar Bush II: Science for the 21st Century. Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi.
44. Steelman, John R. (1947). Science and Public Policy: A Program for the Nation, The President's Scientific Research Board. Vols. 1-5. Washington, DC: U.S.G.P.O.
45. Teitelman, Robert (1994). The Profits of Science. New York: Basic Books.
46. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human Understanding: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts. Princeton: Princeton University.
47. Weinberg, Alvin M. (1963). 'Criteria for scientific choice.' Minerva 1: 159-171.
48. Woodhouse, Edward J. (1992). 'Toward more usable technology policy and analyses,' in Gary C. Bryner, ed., Science, Technology, and Politics: Policy Analysis in Congress. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 13-30.
49. Zachary, G. Pascal (1997). Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century. New York: The Free Press.